Iran, world powers deadlocked at nuclear talks

MOSCOW Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:58am EDT

European Union Foreign Policy Chief Catherine Ashton (L) meets with Iran's Chief Negotiator Saeed Jalili in Moscow, June 18, 2012. REUTERS/Kirill Kudryavtsev/Pool

European Union Foreign Policy Chief Catherine Ashton (L) meets with Iran's Chief Negotiator Saeed Jalili in Moscow, June 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Kirill Kudryavtsev/Pool

Related Topics

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Iran and six world powers blamed each other for deadlock at talks on Tehran's nuclear program on Tuesday as negotiators struggled for a breakthrough to reduce the risk of a new Middle East war.

Late on the second and final day of talks in Moscow, diplomats said negotiators were still far from agreement on Iranian work which the United States, China, Russia, Germany, France and Britain fear may be aimed at building nuclear arms.

The six powers want Tehran to stop enriching uranium to levels that bring it close to acquiring weapons-grade material, but Iran has demanded relief from economic sanctions and an acknowledgement that it has the right to enrich uranium.

If talks collapse, anxiety could grow on financial markets over the danger of higher oil prices and conflict in the Middle East because Israel has threatened to attack Iranian nuclear sites if diplomacy fails to stop Tehran getting the bomb.

"We did not come to Moscow only for discussions. We came to Moscow for a resolution. But we believe the opposite side is not ready to reach a resolution," an Iranian diplomat said.

Iran says its program has only non-military purposes but the so-called P5+1, grouping the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany - say Tehran must do more to prove this and permit United Nations inspections of its work.

"Our key requirements are: stop, shut and ship," said a Western diplomat who was present at the talks.

He was referring to demands for Iran to stop producing higher-grade uranium, ship any stockpile out of the country and close down an underground enrichment facility, Fordow.

Diplomats said efforts were being made to find enough common ground to press on with talks in Moscow, and to ensure negotiations continue elsewhere in the future.

"There are a lot of ideas in play. It's part of the ebb and flow of negotiations," said a Western envoy.

"Contacts are still ongoing to seek a way forward," another Western diplomat said after hours of talks on Tuesday.

RUSSIAN HOPES

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, who leads Russia's delegation at the talks, said as talks resumed on Tuesday that diplomacy could still work even though a European Union spokesman had described day one as "intense and tough".

"I don't think anything will break down. We will have a reasonable outcome," Ryabkov said.

But other diplomats were less optimistic and hopes receded as the day wore on with no sign of progress.

The Moscow talks follow two rounds of negotiations since diplomacy resumed in April after a 15-month hiatus during which the West cranked up sanctions pressure and Israel repeated its threat to bomb Iranian nuclear sites if diplomacy failed.

A series of United Nations Security Council resolutions since 2006 have demanded Iran suspend all its enrichment-related activities. Tehran denies planning to build nuclear weapons and says its program is purely for civilian purposes.

Rather than halt enrichment - a process which refines uranium for use as fuel or, if done to a much higher level, nuclear bomb material - Iran has increased its activities.

Experts had said even before the talks began that a breakthrough was unlikely.

The P5+1 are wary of making concessions that would let Tehran draw out the talks and gain the time needed to develop nuclear weapons capability. Iran's negotiators want a deal that they can sell at home as a triumph.

"No diplomatic deal to solve the Iranian nuclear standoff will be possible if it does not allow Tehran's leadership to proclaim some measure of victory, most probably a recognition of Iran's right to enrich uranium for civilian reactors," said George Perkovich of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think-tank.

NEW SANCTIONS

An EU embargo on Iranian oil takes full effect on July 1 and new U.S. financial sanctions some days before that. Iran's crude oil exports have fallen by some 40 percent this year, according to the International Energy Agency [ID:nL5E8HD4JG].

Increasing the pressure, Israel - widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed country in the Middle East - has said time is running out before Iran's nuclear facilities, some of which are deep underground, become invulnerable to air strikes.

In early 2010, Iran announced it had started enriching uranium to 20 percent purity, a level much higher than what is needed for power generation and seen by some experts as a dangerous step towards being able to make bomb material.

The six powers want a substantive response to their offer of fuel supplies for Tehran's research reactor and relief in sanctions on the sale of commercial aircraft parts to Iran.

Diplomats said the powers had also suggested, at a meeting in Baghdad in May, that they suspend introducing new sanctions at the U.N. level while diplomacy is taking place, but only if their demands on high-grade uranium are met.

After meeting at the G20 summit in Mexico on Monday, Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Barack Obama again called for Tehran to prove its nuclear program is not aimed at developing weapons. Obama said they had agreed there was still time for a diplomatic solution to the standoff.

(Additional reporting by Fredrik Dahl in Vienna; Writing by Justyna Pawlak; Editing by Timothy Heritage and Andrew Roche)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (26)
Thomas269 wrote:
It is time to elect Adelson as proxy-president so that Mitt Romeny can get on with a war on Iran.

Jun 19, 2012 8:16am EDT  --  Report as abuse
RoaringFish wrote:
If I were Iran, I would just leave the NPT. They are getting nothing out of being in it, nicely summed up in the idiotic “…called for Tehran to prove its nuclear program is not aimed at developing weapons.” You cannot prove that something ‘is not’. You can only prove that something ‘is’.

This is the same ploy used by the witch-finders: “You are a witch! You must prove you are not!” but that is not how the modern world works.

In any rational world, the onus is on the accusers to prove their case, just as when someone is accused of murder the prosecution has to prove they did it, and if they fail he is found not guilty and released.

Here, the ‘western powers’ have failed to find a single scrap of proof that Iran is making a bomb, so they are resorting to witch-finder, guilty-unless-proven-innocent, tactics by demanding the logically impossible. Just as they did in Iraq.

Jun 19, 2012 8:37am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MaxTacks wrote:
“Our key requirements are: stop, shut and ship,” said a Western diplomat. In other words, they are asking Iran to surrender or be bombed. The West is not interested in a negotiated solution. The consensus of 18 U.S. intelligence agencies ,with a HIGH degree of confidence, is that Iran is not building a bomb.

Jun 19, 2012 11:25am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures