Israel: "all options" open after Iran talks fail

JERUSALEM Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:21pm EDT

Related Topics

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel responded on Wednesday to a lack of progress in talks aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear program by demanding that the West impose stiffer economic sanctions on Tehran and hinting anew that a military option was still on the table.

Six world powers and Iran failed to secure a breakthrough at talks in Moscow this week, the third round under the latest diplomatic initiative, and set no date for more political negotiations.

"It is time for the United States and Western powers to impose more severe sanctions in the oil embargo and financial sectors in order to stop Iran's nuclear development program," Vice Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz of the centrist Kadima party said in a written statement after talks in Washington with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Mofaz, a former defense minister and military chief, said that in addition to economic steps there was a need "to continue to prepare all other options", an oblique suggestion that a military attack to prevent Iran developing a nuclear weapon remained a possible course of action.

While Western powers suspect Iran of trying to develop the capacity to build a nuclear bomb, Iran says its nuclear program is destined for energy production alone.

Before reports of the Moscow talks breaking up, Mofaz was quoted as telling reporters in Washington that any use of military power "should be the last option, and I believe that this option should be led by the U.S. and the Western countries".

Mofaz heads the largest party in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-leaning ruling coalition, since the two leaders forged a partnership last month to avoid threats by their opponents to seek an early election.

Western concern that Israel, which regards Iran's atomic project as an existential threat given its calls for the demise of the Jewish state, might resort to force has fuelled efforts to continue discussions with Tehran.

Technical talks with Iran have been scheduled for July 3 in Istanbul, but no further political talks have been agreed, and some experts have said the risk of war will increase unless diplomacy is renewed.

Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle East country with nuclear weapons.

On his four-day visit to the U.S. capital, Mofaz is also seeking U.S. help in arranging a meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to try to renew peace talks deadlocked since 2010 over Jewish settlement building in occupied territory.

(Writing by Allyn Fisher-Ilan; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
CptWS wrote:
Im bored of hearing Israel/others repeat this same sentence, over and over again.

If Israel was going to attack, it would do so while Syria is currently as weak/disrupted as it is reducing any counter attack from Syria on Irans behalf.

The simple fact is by repeating this, or similar threats, Israel is doing nothing but emboldening Iran. And making Israel look weak.

Why weak? Because in a few weeks time, or maybe even days time, Israel will be all but begging the West/NATO countries in particular to attack on their behalf, as Iran is this “oh so big threat to its existence”

Put up or shut up, its really that simple.

Jun 20, 2012 10:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
boreal wrote:
Before reports of the Moscow talks breaking up, Mofaz was quoted as telling reporters in Washington that any use of military power “should be the last option, and I believe that this option should be led by the U.S. and the Western countries”.
——— ————
Translation: bleed for us U.S & Western patsies, sacrifice your daughters, your sons, empty your treasure and if that’s not enough go and barrow from China.

Jun 20, 2012 11:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Jabotito wrote:
If it’s possible, winning some time would be positive. Not only to give hard sanctions (oil embargo start on 1 July) and diplomacy a chance, but also to give Israel more time to deploy Iron Dome batteries in its northern border to prepare the Home Front for the next regional war. It is well known that any attack on Iranian nuclear facilities will precipitate a response of their proxies: Hezbollah in Lebanon and Palestinian terror organizations in Gaza. The war is already won for Israel and the US, the problem is how this will affect Israeli civilians and how many European Jews will die as consequence. Anyway, every scenario is better for the Middle East and the world than a nuclear Iran. Do it when the right time comes… not before, not after.

Jun 21, 2012 2:53am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus