Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Celebrities, activists risk losing Assange bail money

Related Topics

People put up a banner that reads ''Free Assange'' during a demonstration to support Julian Assange in his asylum request to Ecuador, in Quito June 20, 2012. REUTERS/Stringer

People put up a banner that reads ''Free Assange'' during a demonstration to support Julian Assange in his asylum request to Ecuador, in Quito June 20, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

WASHINGTON | Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:16pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The founder of Wikileaks knows how to keep a secret.

Two days before claiming asylum at the Ecuadorean embassy in London, Julian Assange partied with some of his most famous and well-heeled supporters. He did not mention that, in order to avoid extradition to Sweden on sexual-assault charges, he was about to potentially forfeit the bail money they had posted.

Among the well-known figures who stand to lose some or all of whatever they pledged for Assange's bail are London socialite Jemima Khan, British film director Ken Loach and the U.S. filmmaker Michael Moore.

Most of Assange's supporters did not respond to requests for comment, but author Philip Knightley said he was standing by his fellow Australian. "I'd do it again," Knightley said, calling Assange a "victim of flawed British and Swedish justice systems."

Assange, who had exhausted his appeals against extradition in the British court system, walked into Ecuador's embassy in London on Tuesday and requested political asylum.

Representatives of Scotland Yard and the British court system said that as a result, Assange violated bail terms which required him to abide by a court-imposed daily curfew requiring him to return to the address of a supporter near London.

The bail terms were imposed by British courts in December 2010 to allow Assange's release from a London prison where he had been held pending resolution of a request from Swedish authorities for his extradition for questioning in a sexual misconduct case.

The controversial Assange still has strong support in some quarters, and his bail fund had amassed 240,000 British pounds, or about $376,000.

One long-time Assange supporter, who asked for anonymity when discussing details of the case, told Reuters that Assange attended a party on Sunday night with supporters, including some of the people who had contributed to his bail fund.

"A LONG GOODBYE"

During the course of the party, the supporter said, Assange did not even hint that he was contemplating an attempt to avoid extradition by asking Ecuador for asylum.

Tariq Ali, a British writer and political activist, said he was invited to the party but couldn't attend. The day before, Ali said, he "had a long chat" on the phone with Assange "which, now that I reflect on it, was a long goodbye."

An official spokesman for WikiLeaks and Assange did not respond to voice and text messages requesting comment.

A second Assange sympathizer said he believed that one or two of Assange's wealthiest supporters had handed over tens of thousands of pounds in bail money to the British courts.

Knightley, an Australian author of investigative books about espionage, said he had not put up any cash but had pledged to pay out 20,000 pounds in the event Assange breached his court-imposed bail terms - funds he acknowledged he might now have to come up with.

Vaughan Smith, a former combat cameraman who provided Assange with court-approved accommodations at his country mansion for several months last year after Assange's release on bail, said that, like Knightley, he pledged, but did not hand over, 20,000 pounds for Assange's bail which he might now have surrender to authorities.

But Smith added: "Despite the risk to my pocket, I'm still supporting him."

A representative of the British court system said that the courts would make no immediate move to confiscate the bail money put up by Assange's supporters and call in unpaid pledges. Any order to declare the bail money forfeited, the court official said, would have to be issued by a judge.

A legal source close to the Assange case said that the bail guarantors' money was definitely at risk although it was possible that the financial backers could get some or even all of their money back. If Assange is granted asylum in Ecuador, the source said, this might make it legally impossible for Britain to confiscate the bail money.

(Editing by Warren Strobel and Christopher Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
WillyWonka787 wrote:
Hilarious. Proving that his ego knows no bounds and that there is no level of betrayal of even his closest supporters that he will not engage in to save his own skin, Julian Assange has now backstabbed the most loyal and die-hard of his dwindling number of supporters by skipping out on them and leaving their bail money in the lurch. They will now have the honor of unwillingly putting their money where their mouths are.

Somewhere, Fate is laughing uproariously at wealthy, idealistic and supremely wide-eyed naive and street-stupid Assange supporters being unceremoniously ‘clipped and stripped’ by their own hero, who presumably will now blithely tell them that they “should feel honored to financially contribute to my cause”.

I love poetic justice.

Jun 21, 2012 2:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Austell wrote:
Very cynical, negative article…

God you just HATE freedom of information don’t you reuters!

Probably because you are just 1 family of billionaires who rule over our information with an iron fist I guess, not too out of character for you at all.

Jun 21, 2012 4:19am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Austell wrote:
WillyWonka787;

Buddy… you’re just…. oh god you’re not even worth 5 more seconds of my time…

Jun 21, 2012 4:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.