Sponsored Links

Existing home sales fall 1.5 percent in May

Related Topics

A ''for sale'' sign is seen outside a home in New York June 19, 2012. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

A ''for sale'' sign is seen outside a home in New York June 19, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

WASHINGTON | Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:13am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Home resales fell in May and the median sales price rose only because of a drop in sale of lower priced homes, casting a shadow on the country's nascent housing market recovery.

The National Association of Realtors said on Thursday that existing home sales slipped 1.5 percent to an annual rate of 4.55 million units last month. That was in line with analysts' expectations.

Nationwide, the median price for a home resale rose to $182,600 in May, up 7.9 percent from a year earlier and the highest since June 2010.

"I would attribute this primarily to the shortage of inventories on the lower priced homes," Lawrence Yun, the NAR's chief economist, told reporters.

Yun said sales of homes costing at least $250,000 were up more than 20 percent from a year earlier, but that sales declined for homes priced under $100,000.

While the broader U.S. economy appears to be losing steam, housing has gained traction and has become a relative bright spot.

Despite a sharp slowdown in hiring across the country, home prices appear to be stabilizing and home builder sentiment has risen to a five-year high. Groundbreaking at building sites for new homes has held above a 700,000-unit annual rate for the last five months, a first since 2008.

There were also positive signs within the NAR report on Thursday. Distressed sales, which include those due to foreclosure, accounted for 25 percent of resales. That was the lowest level since the NAR started keeping track in 2008.

Economists polled by Reuters had expected sales at a 4.57 million-unit sales pace last month.

Inventories slipped to 2.49 million, which represents a 6.6 month supply at the current sales pace.

(Reporting by Jason Lange; Editing by Neil Stempleman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Bernie777 wrote:
If you believe any stats coming from National Association of Realtors you should have your head examined.

Jun 21, 2012 11:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
brotherkenny4 wrote:
The price of a house should be based on the expected cost at this time for the materials and labor to build it, not on what the market will bear. That’s how you got so many fools underwater. They thought that ponzi scheme would go on forever. The price of houses should be dropping in real value still, because wages are stagnent or decreasing. Materials may go up, but mostly due to energy cost. We tied our economy to oil and consumption, so we then live with it. It’s great that so many can make a living manipulating the stupid, but that’s not a real economy that adds real value, and eventually even the dummies will catch on, or maybe not.

Jun 21, 2012 11:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamesChirico wrote:
There has been an uptick all year of new housing starts. The bubble say existing home prices double from 2001-2006, obviously the market priced these homes too high with 20% of mortgages underwater. Why buy a $400,000 new home when you can custom build one for that price new? In the 50s 3 years of average family income bought a home. Today that is 4 overall and more depending on location, location, location. You can buy a home for a song in Detroit, your lungs in Phoenix.

Jun 21, 2012 11:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.