Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Boehner to U.S. House on healthcare ruling: don't gloat

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:45pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner on Thursday told the Republican rank-and-file there will be no celebrating in Congress if the Supreme Court rules against President Barack Obama's sweeping healthcare reform law.

"No one knows what the court will decide," Boehner said in a memo to fellow Republicans. "But if the court strikes down all or part of the president's healthcare reform law, there will be no spiking of the ball."

He underlined the last eight words to emphasize his reference to the NFL football end-zone celebration.

Boehner fears Republican gloating over a court victory could detract from the party's emphasis on the struggling economy and the need for job growth, two campaign issues that consistently trump healthcare as voter priorities in national opinion polls.

"We will not celebrate," Boehner said, during a time of unemployment and rising government debt and healthcare costs.

The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Obama's signature domestic policy achievement, would extend health coverage to millions of uninsured people, establish new consumer protections and seek to reorganize the delivery of care with the intent of lowering costs and boosting efficiency.

But 26 U.S. states have asked the high court to overturn the measure, saying it exceeds the federal government's constitutional authority.

Polls show the law, dubbed "Obamacare" by critics, is unpopular with most Americans. Republicans have vowed to repeal anything the Supreme Court leaves standing.

A ruling is expected by the end of next week.

(Reporting By David Morgan; Editing by Xavier Briand)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
fromthecenter wrote:
They will do it, and the vote will be 5-4. This decision was made even before the law was passed.

Jun 21, 2012 11:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
RoaringFish wrote:
@fromthecenter ~ I totally agree with you. Republicans know this to, which is why they used the SC to by-pass democracy – they know they can’t win the political debate.

What Republicans haven’t figured out is that they have shot themselves in the foot. If their tame judges in the SC don’t toe the party line, they will look stupid. If their tame judges do toe the party line, Republicans will be hated for destroying the popular Obamacare. They will be hated even more when it becomes clear that they have no ideas for a replacement, just a return to the bad old days that Obama was elected to end.

… and then of course, Romeny is going to have a lot of awkward questions to answer on Romneycare…

Jun 22, 2012 9:11am EDT  --  Report as abuse
USMCPatriot wrote:
It is always amazing, as well disconcerting, how so many people have no little knowledge or no understanding of the Constitution. The Constitution knows no political party! It is what it is, the law of the land against which all legislation must be tested. This is one of those cases and regardless of alleged merit, no law passed by Congress is immune to being tested against the Constitution. There is a procedure for modifying the Constitution requiring the ratification of a percentage of the States before also becoming the law of the land. If something has sufficient merit to endure that process it will have been tested by the people.

It is the job of the Supreme Court to compare and test legislation passed by Congress, not to affirm a Constitutional reach around attempts often enacted by a controlling party in Congress. If this process is not honored then we might as well forget our Democratic Republic as we will become no better than so many so called 3rd world countries which are in continuous chaos and often without a functioning government.

Jun 22, 2012 11:10am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.