Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

New motion for bail for Trayvon Martin's killer

Related Topics

MIAMI | Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:32pm EDT

MIAMI (Reuters) - Lawyers for the Florida neighborhood watch volunteer charged in the killing of unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin have asked for his release from jail for a second time on bond, despite lies told about his finances at a court hearing in April.

The request on behalf of George Zimmerman came in a motion filed with the Seminole County Circuit Court in central Florida on Monday, where a bond hearing for Zimmerman will be held on Friday.

"Mr. Zimmerman is still entitled to a reasonable bond notwithstanding the court's finding that Mr. Zimmerman failed to disclose the existence of the donated money at his last bond hearing," said the motion signed by Zimmerman's lead attorney.

He was referring to the fact that Zimmerman sat silently in court, during his original bond hearing on April 20, as his wife lied under oath about the couple's finances and claimed they had no real assets and were essentially broke.

Prosecutors later said Shellie Zimmerman was lying because the couple had raised at least $135,000 from a website created by Zimmerman to collect funds from anonymous donors for his legal defense.

At the first hearing, Zimmerman was granted a $150,000 bond but it was revoked earlier this month and he was ordered back into custody. His wife, Shellie, was arrested and charged with perjury.

"Mr. Zimmerman's failure to advise the court of the existence of the donated funds at the initial bond hearing was wrong and Mr. Zimmerman accepts responsibility for his part in allowing the court to be misled as to his true financial circumstances," the motion said.

It said the money in the defense fund had since been turned over to an independent administrator, however, and that Zimmerman no longer had any direct access to it.

The motion said Zimmerman posed no risk of harm to the community and should be released for a second time on bail pending his trial on second-degree murder charges.

The charges stem from the shooting death of the 17-year-old Martin during a confrontation he had with Zimmerman in a gated community in Sanford, Florida, on February 26.

The killing grabbed national attention because police initially failed to arrest Zimmerman. That failure stemmed from Florida's "Stand Your Ground" self-defense law and Zimmerman's claim that he used deadly force because he believed his life was being threatened by Martin.

(Reporting By Tom Brown; Editing by Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
BeeAnn wrote:
they are “essentially broke”

that money is for defense lawyers not Bond !

what good is bond if you can’t pay a lawyer to defend you ?

Jun 25, 2012 2:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
james1611king wrote:
The media is so pathetically biased toward a liberal agenda. How about a more subjective title for this article? New Motion for Bail from Man Who Defended Himself from a Thug

Jun 25, 2012 2:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Banj0man wrote:
I agree with the Zimmerman lawyers. If the judge wants you in jail, then don’t allow any bond. But if there are guidelines for what bonds should be in relation to the crime instead of in relation to the ability to pay, then there are guidelines.

I know if I get a traffic ticket, it is a set amount regardless of my income, unlike in Sweden where it is related to my income so speeding will hurt a rich person the same as it hurst a poor one.

I thought bail was American-style, not Swedish-style.

Jun 25, 2012 2:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.