Lawmakers reach transportation deal, Keystone out

WASHINGTON Wed Jun 27, 2012 5:38pm EDT

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks during his news conference on the payroll tax cut extension on Capitol Hill in Washington December 23, 2011. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks during his news conference on the payroll tax cut extension on Capitol Hill in Washington December 23, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Yuri Gripas

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawmakers from the U.S. Congress cut a deal on a massive transportation bill on Wednesday, ending seven weeks of talks just days before federal funding expires for roads, bridges and mass-transit projects.

"I am so glad that House Republicans met Democrats half way, as Senate Republicans did months ago," Senator Barbara Boxer, who led the talks, said in a statement.

Boxer gave few details of the massive bill, which was a big priority for both parties ahead of November 6 elections because it supports an estimated 3 million jobs.

John Mica, who led House Republicans in the talks, said the bill would keep funding at current levels through the end of fiscal 2014 - a year longer than originally proposed by the Senate, giving more certainty to state governments planning big projects.

However, a Republican proposal forcing quick approval of the Canada-to-U.S. Keystone oil pipeline will not be part of the package, a senior Democratic aide said.

"Keystone is out," said the aide, who asked not to be identified.

A House Republican leadership aide declined to comment on specific provisions, but said Republicans "got some important wins" and improved the funding package originally passed by the Democratic-controlled Senate.

The package is also expected to include a one-year, $6 billion fix to prevent a doubling of interest rates on federal student loans. Funding for the National Flood Insurance Program might also be wrapped in, senators said on Wednesday.

The package must now pass formal votes in the Senate and House and be signed by President Barack Obama by Saturday.

KEYSTONE WAS MAJOR HURDLE

The subject of TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline was one of the thorniest issues before negotiators during weeks of talks - but was one of the very last topics to be tackled.

Obama ruled earlier this year that more environmental reviews were needed for all but the southernmost tip of the 1,700-mile-long pipeline, which would carry crude from Canada's oilsands to Texas.

The White House has said Obama would veto a bill that overrides his decision.

Republicans have championed the pipeline's cause ahead of the November presidential and congressional elections, arguing that it would create much-needed construction jobs and panning Obama for stalling it.

The Keystone measure has passed in the House four times, but narrowly failed a Senate vote in March.

Republicans pushed hard for other concessions in the transportation funding bill, which was based on a two-year, $109 billion package passed by the Senate.

Boehner told reporters the deal would include "significant reforms" to streamline environmental reviews for certain highway projects, and reduce the number of programs in the highway bill, focusing spending on core transportation projects rather than directing money toward roadside landscaping and other ancillary programs.

The deal will include provisions to ensure that the bulk of fines imposed on BP after the Gulf of Mexico oil spill will go to Gulf coast communities.

"We think it's more than fair to have 80 percent of the fines for this event dedicated for restoration along the Gulf Coast," said Republican Senator David Vitter, who was part of the negotiating panel.

(Editing by Vicki Allen and David Brunnstrom)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
trnyd wrote:
Who’s moving the crude now ? BNSF owned by biggest supporter of you know who. Always the same story, just follow the money.

Jun 27, 2012 6:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JBltn wrote:
Another cogent question is why should the US take any environmental risks whatsoever for an oil transport pipeline that is carrying a heavy mineralized crude oil intended for sale & export to foreign markets? Another question is what oil companies will post a fiscal surety bond and what amount posted, remember the Exxon oil spill SNAFU, against pipeline breakage, as they always do, subsequent oil spill and probable aquifer pollution and other environmental impacts; after all, this a Canadian Company’s oil and Canadian companies that strip mined or polluted in the past just walked away without paying any money.

Who or what corporation is making money from this deal and leaving US taxpayers taking the risks? I think that this project also needs a financial impact assessment and risk management evaluation; why doesn’t Keystone build a pipeline across Canada and export from a Canadian port? Answer: because it’s cheaper and they have less liability exposure in case of a future ,expected, oil spill.

Jun 27, 2012 8:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
UnPartisan wrote:
You make it sound like there is not technology available to deal with the spills. The gulf coast disaster that never was proves you wrong. The only thing you can say that happens is that people get a generic sickness and you blame pollution. Just like stating that asthma rates are high due to pollution from coal fired power. If that is the case shouldn’t asthma have been at an all time high when people used coal and wood in their homes each and every winter to heat their house? Common sense isn’t on the environmentalist side, just sensationalism and threats of doom and gloom.

Jun 27, 2012 8:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Retirement Road Map

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.