Analysis: Republicans vow to take Holder to court

WASHINGTON Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:33pm EDT

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (L) and Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Sen. Patrick Leahy talk on the South Lawn of the White House during a picnic for Members of Congress, hosted by U.S. President Barack Obama, in Washington June 27, 2012. REUTERS/Larry Downing

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (L) and Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Sen. Patrick Leahy talk on the South Lawn of the White House during a picnic for Members of Congress, hosted by U.S. President Barack Obama, in Washington June 27, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Perhaps as significant as the contempt citation Congress issued to Attorney General Eric Holder is the likelihood Republicans will also go to court to enforce a congressional demand for documents - a tactic pursued only twice before in U.S. history.

The Republican-led House of Representatives voted on Thursday to find Holder, the country's top law enforcement officer, in contempt of Congress for withholding documents in a botched gun-running sting operation on the U.S.-Mexico border.

In a second vote, the House gave itself the authority to go to court to get the documents.

That will put a spotlight not only on Holder but also on his boss, President Barack Obama, who has insisted he can withhold the documents under executive privilege.

"The contempt citation will go away," said Todd Peterson, a law professor at George Washington University.

"Congress will probably file a lawsuit, in part hoping to find some judicial support but more because it's just another way to publicize the president's refusal to comply with their demands for documents," Peterson said.

Failure to obey a potential court order on the documents would expose Holder to a more serious contempt of court charge, though few expect it to come to that.

Critics complain that high-level legal jousting has become a sport in Washington, where partisan warriors look for any way to attack their foes.

Speaking to reporters in New Orleans, Holder said "an unnecessary court conflict" would ensue because of the House votes. He said it would not distract him or his staff "from the important tasks that are our responsibility."

On both previous occasions when Congress went to court, the targets were Republican and the cases had some success.

In 1974 a federal appeals court granted a Senate panel's demand for one of President Richard Nixon's tape recordings, although the case was later dismissed on other grounds.


In 2008 Democrats, investigating whether the firings of nine U.S. attorneys were politically motivated, won an order that forced Bush administration aides, including former White House counsel Harriet Miers, to hand over documents and testify.

The aides had refused. The House voted to hold them in contempt and went to federal court in Washington where Judge John Bates dismissed the aides' claim that they were "absolutely immune" from having to testify.

It was the first time in U.S. history that a court successfully ordered the White House to turn over information to Congress.

Bates declined to referee the fine points of what documents the White House needed to turn over. Instead he encouraged a negotiated settlement, and the sides reached a compromise one year after Democrats sued.

Now, Republicans are tearing a page from the same playbook to use against Holder, whose cabinet role puts him in charge of the Justice Department in Obama's Democratic administration.

The court action could entangle the Justice Department in an uncomfortable case and force the Obama administration to give new details of the unreleased documents.

The case pitting House Republicans against Holder would largely mirror the 2008 case, said Washington lawyer Stanley Brand, a former general counsel to the House.

"They'll take the lawsuit that was filed in the previous case, they'll change it to reflect the parties and the facts in this case, and they'll file it," Brand said. "They're following what I'd call the Miers precedent."


At issue is how Holder and the department responded to disclosures about a scheme codenamed Fast and Furious in which federal agents allowed potentially illegal gun purchases to go ahead in hopes of tracking the guns through Mexican drug cartels. Two of the guns were found at the scene of a 2010 shooting where a U.S. border agent, Brian Terry, was killed.

Republicans who disagree generally with Holder on the subject of gun rights say he has not been forthcoming about what he knew of the program.

Republicans "will use what we can," including hiring lawyers, to try to get information from the Justice Department, said Representative Darrell Issa, who has led the House's inquiry into the gun-running operation.

Holder said he was willing to negotiate with congressional investigators, although the Justice Department told Congress on June 20 that Obama was invoking executive privilege over the disputed documents.

A lawsuit would serve Republicans by keeping alive public discussion of the Fast and Furious episode, but it could be months before they would get additional documents.

"Even if the House wins the case in court, it's not actually winning. It takes so long to actually win in court," said Josh Chafetz, an associate law professor at Cornell University.

Holder might no longer be attorney general by then, if Republican Mitt Romney unseats Obama in the November 6 election or if Obama chooses a new attorney general for a second term.

In the meantime, a judge could force the Justice Department to disclose - at least to the court, in a document called a privilege log - further details of the documents it is withholding, Peterson said.

(Additional reporting by Kathy Finn in New Orleans; editing by Howard Goller, Fred Barbash and Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (44)
izzyis1 wrote:
At present we live under a failed, corrupt and at best an archaic political system. I would love to see this played, which I believe in the end will be ‘negotiated’.
If not it may be a positive step for honest democracy. LOL

Jun 28, 2012 1:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
spongeblog wrote:
This looks like a job for…Supreme Court!

Jun 28, 2012 1:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
l.conley wrote:
435 votes of yea for Eric Holder’s contempt charges isn’t asking too much.

The system “if you are going to make an omelet you are going to scramble some eggs” is what kills, not guns. Obama/Holder is attempting to obscure in a systemic “if you are going to make an omelet you are going to scramble some eggs”, inside of you and me,

Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer knew the tactic of “fast and furious” for certain Wednesday February 2nd 2011; Acting ATF Director Melson knew the tactics for certain Tuesday AM, February 8th 2011.

Friday, February 4th 2011 3:49 PM, the memo was sent. However the memo was about the meeting Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer had in Mexico with Mexico’s high level government officials Wednesday February 2nd 2011.

Paragraph 3 (Pg 8/9) “Propose Cross-Border Operation.
AAG Breuer suggested allowing straw purchasers to cross into Mexico so SSP can arrest and PGR can prosecute and convict. Such coordinated operations between United States and Mexico may send a strong message to traffickers.RC -6″.

Paragraph 1 (Pg 8/9) “Arms Trafficking…(Please note that the ideal of holding a High Level Meeting in the spring also came up during the meeting with Secretary Clinton’s visit to Mexico last week).”

Memo Tuesday, February 8th 2011 7:19 PM
Paragraph 3 (Pg 9/9) Controlled Delivery, again on Tuesday AM, February 8th 2011 this time Acting ATF Director Melson asked again to let guns walk into Mexico from United States.

Public released “fast and furious” memos.

(2:45/5:30) Federal Agent John Dobson I was told ” if you are going to make an omelet you are going to scramble some eggs” Federal Agent John Dobson: I was ordered to let U.S. guns into Mexico – CBS News

Jun 28, 2012 2:38am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.