Sponsored Links
TEXT-S&P revises Alpha Natural Resources outlook to negative
Overview
-- We expect operating conditions for domestic producers of thermal coal
and, to a lesser extent, metallurgical coal to be difficult because of a mild
winter and natural gas substitution in the U.S. and slower steel production
overseas.
-- U.S.-based Alpha Natural Resources Inc. is likely to post weaker
operating results and credit metrics relative to our previous assumptions.
-- We are revising our outlook on Alpha to negative from stable and
affirming our ratings, including the 'BB-' corporate credit rating.
-- The negative rating outlook acknowledges the potential for a downgrade
if leverage climbs above 6x for a sustained period or if Alpha's strong
liquidity weakens as a result of further deterioration in market conditions.
Rating Action
On June 29, 2012, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its ratings,
including the 'BB-' corporate credit rating, on Alpha Natural Resources Inc.
At the same time, we revised the outlook to negative from stable.
Rationale
The rating affirmation and negative rating outlook reflect our expectations
that the domestic steam coal market will remain challenged with the
possibility of additional production cuts, while 2013 metallurgical (met) coal
prices will likely improve as the global economy improves, benefitting from
strong global demand and limited supply.
Our corporate credit rating on Alpha reflects what we consider to be the
company's "fair" business risk and its "aggressive" financial risk. Risks
include meaningful operations in Central Appalachia (CAPP), where coal
producers face significant regulatory and environmental constraints, depleting
coal seams, rising costs, and high debt. Strengths include the potential for
higher met coal prices next year, the company's significant reserve base, and
its strong liquidity.
Our baseline scenario assumes that Alpha's 2012 production is about 110
million tons, down from our previous expectations of about 118 million tons.
Consequently, our expectation for cash costs increases to about $50 per ton
from our previous assumptions of about $47 per ton, resulting in EBITDA of
below $1 billion. We now estimate debt to EBITDA of about 5x and funds from
operations (FFO) to debt of about 17%.
We expect 2013 production to decline further to about 90 million tons because
of the continuing challenges facing the domestic steam coal market. Although
we believe met coal prices will improve, we expect 2013 EBITDA to decline to
$750 million to $850 million. Given these assumptions, we expect Alpha's
leverage to weaken in 2013 to about 5.5x and FFO to debt of about 15%, levels
we believe are still appropriate for our aggressive financial risk profile.
It is our opinion that Alpha's large and diverse coal reserves, its position
as a leading provider of met coal, and its strong export position will enable
the company to benefit from an eventual recovery in coal demand. Alpha is
America's third-largest coal producer as measured by production. It is the
nation's largest supplier of met coal, which is used in steel-making, and is a
major supplier of thermal coal to electric utilities and manufacturing
industries.
Liquidity
In our view, Alpha has "strong" liquidity, based on the following observations
and assumptions:
-- Liquidity sources (including cash and internally generated cash flow)
will exceed uses by more than 1.5x over the next 12 to 18 months;
-- Liquidity sources will continue to exceed uses, even if EBITDA were to
decline by up to 30%; and
-- Alpha's compliance with financial maintenance covenants likely would
survive an up to 30% drop in EBITDA without the company breaching covenant
test measures.
As of March 31, 2012, Alpha has available liquidity of about $1.8 billion,
including cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of about $700
million and about $1.1 billion in availability under its secured credit
facilities.
We expect the company to generate free operating cash flow in excess of $300
million in 2012 as lower production results in working capital being a source
of cash, in addition to a full year of the Massey operations. We expect
capital spending of about $550 million in 2012, comprising both maintenance-
and growth-related spending. We also expect cash outflows of about $100
million in 2012, related to the $210 million settlement to resolve the
criminal investigation, regulatory civil proceedings, as well as other health,
safety, and related issues at Massey.
We expect the company to use excess cash to fund growth opportunities, both
internally and externally. The company maintains a share repurchase program,
which allows it to repurchase up to $600 million of its outstanding common
stock. Alpha repurchased about $200 million of its shares in 2011--roughly
$100 million of which from this particular program. Alpha does not pay a
dividend, and we do not expect Alpha to repurchase any shares under the
program in the coming months.
Alpha has about $210 million of amortization payments through 2014, with its
$287.5 million of convertible notes and $658.7 million of Massey Energy
Convertible notes, both due in 2015. The company also expects to make pension
plan contributions in 2012 in the $35 million area to achieve at least a 90%
funded status with respect to defined benefit retirement plans.
The $1 billion senior secured revolving credit facility due 2016 is subject to
a minimum interest coverage ratio requirement of 2.5x, which steps down to
2.25x for the fourth quarter of 2012. It is also subject to a senior secured
leverage ratio of 2.5x. We expect Alpha will maintain at least a 30% cushion
in its compliance with these covenants over the next few quarters.
Recovery analysis
For the complete recovery analysis, see our recovery report on Alpha,
published May 30, 2012, on RatingsDirect.
Outlook
The negative rating outlook reflects our view that 2013 operating performance
could deteriorate more than we expect if the company lowers its production
guidance further because of continued weak coal markets, resulting in weaker
credit metrics than we currently expect.
We could lower our rating if coal demand deteriorates further, if a disruption
were to occur at one of its key coal operations, or if costs increase
meaningfully, resulting in further production curtailments and weaker credit
measures. We would consider a lower rating if debt to EBITDA rose to more than
6x and FFO to total debt fell below 15%, and if these measures were likely to
remain for an extended period. We would also consider a downgrade if
liquidity, in our view, becomes "adequate," which could occur if Alpha draws
more than $600 million against its revolver.
Although a positive rating action seems less likely in the near term given the
operating environment, one could occur if domestic coal demand improves and
exports increase such that leverage strengthened to below 5x and FFO to debt
above 15%.
Related Criteria And Research
-- Key Credit Factors: Methodology And Assumptions On Risks In The Mining
Industry, June 23, 2009
Ratings List
Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Action
To From
Alpha Natural Resources Inc.
Corporate Credit Rating BB-/Negative/-- BB-/Stable/--
Ratings Affirmed
Alpha Natural Resources Inc.
Senior Unsecured BB-
Recovery Rating 3
Senior Unsecured B
Recovery Rating 6
Massey Energy Co.
Senior Unsecured BB-
Recovery Rating 4
Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect on
the Global Credit Portal at www.globalcreditportal.com. All ratings affected
by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at
www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left
column.
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
jenck566 wrote:
The revision from stable to negative is a bit late with the stock down 85% over the last 12 months. Why not just let this one go and admit it has you stumped?
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.



Follow Reuters