Small babies at higher risk of autism, not Asperger

NEW YORK Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:26pm EDT

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Babies born small or prematurely go on to develop autism at higher rates, although the risk is still small, according to a new study from Finland.

The research is part of a global push to identify the culprits behind the developmental disorder and the recent uptick in its occurrence, which has had scientists scratching their heads for years.

"Previous reports of how birth weight or gestational age is associated with autism have not been consistent," Dr. Andre Sourander, a psychiatrist at Turku University, told Reuters Health by email.

"Because autism spectrum disorders are one of the major challenges in child mental health it is extremely important to get more understanding of its causes," Sourander said.

Autism spectrum disorders, which range from mild Asperger syndrome to severe mental retardation and social disability in childhood autism, are diagnosed in about one in 88 children in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The new results, published in the Journal of Pediatrics, are based on almost two decades' worth of data from more than one million births in Finland.

As of 2005, the rate of autism in the Northern European country was 9 per 10,000 children in Finland, whereas Asperger was diagnosed in 14.5 children out of 10,000.

After accounting for the mother's age, smoking, number of previous births and other factors, Sourander's team found an increased risk of autism, but not Asperger syndrome, in preemies and babies that were very small at birth.

For instance, those who weighed less than 1,500 grams, or 3.3 pounds, at birth had three times the odds of developing autism.

However, because autism is relatively rare, most children who are born very small don't end up with autism, said Sourander.

No one is certain why some children develop autism spectrum disorders, but scientists assume it's caused by an interplay between genes and environment, such as infections or other medical problems during pregnancy.

SOURCE: bit.ly/MGy4vg Journal of Pediatrics, online June 7, 2012.

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
GeorgeBMac wrote:
They keep looking for these wierd, magical connections to Autism and Aspbergers. Yet, the most simple and obvious continues to be ignored: 80% of those affected are boys. Testosterone makes boys. They need to look at the impact of sez hormones. But, I guess our “for-profit-only” medical research system does not want to fund that. And, research goes where the funding goes. That is, medical research is less about curing disease than it is about paying the salaries of the researchers. So, research tends to follow the money.

Jun 30, 2012 10:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Twyla wrote:
There is an obvious and simple explanation. Small babies are given the same vaccines on the same schedule as larger babies. In proportion to their body mass, small babies are receiving higher doses of the vaccine ingredients. In addition, pre-term babies may be more vulnerable than full-term babies due to their detox and immune systems being more immature.

Jul 01, 2012 1:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.