Read
- Taxes on some wealthy French top 100 pct of income: paper
- North Korea fires short-range missiles for two days in a row
|
- Israel warns against Russian arms supply to Syria
- Winning ticket for $590.5 million Powerball lottery sold in Florida
|
- Toyota plans to increase lithium-ion car battery output-Nikkei
Sponsored Links
New IRS rules for disclosure of foreign assets
NEW YORK |
NEW YORK (Reuters) - If you have foreign assets - whether or not you live abroad - the deadline to file with the Internal Revenue Service is June 30. But for those who have not filed the forms previously and are trying to come back into the system, some new rules from the IRS are going to help distinguish between true tax cheats and American citizens abroad who feared the massive penalties required by voluntary disclosure amid the recent IRS crackdown.
The IRS announced that it would help U.S. citizens overseas who are considered low compliance risks - including dual citizens (many Canadians), and those with foreign retirement plans - square their tax obligations through the voluntary disclosure program without facing penalties or additional enforcement actions, starting September 1.
To qualify, these people generally will have simple tax returns and owe $1,500 or less in tax for any of the covered years. IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman called the announcement "a series of common-sense steps to help U.S. citizens get current with their tax obligations and resolve pension issues."
There are between 5 million and 6 million Americans living abroad. The FBAR (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) form is required of any U.S. person who has a financial interest or signature authority over foreign financial accounts whose value topped $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. The forms are complicated, and compliance was so low, that the government started a crackdown in 2009.
Since then, the IRS has brought in more than $5 billion in back taxes, interest and penalties from 33,000 disclosures made under the first two IRS programs. An additional 1,500 disclosures have been made under the latest program for an unspecified amount. How many more billions of dollars remain to come in - whether through voluntary disclosure or negotiated agreements with foreign banks - is anybody's guess, but it's likely to still be quite high.
Through all of this, American expats and dual citizens have complained about being unfairly lumped in with high-net-worth tax cheats. (See previous Reuters story link.reuters.com/rad29s) The new move clearly distinguishes the two groups.
"I think this is a tremendous development," says Scott Michel, president of Caplin & Drysdale in Washington, who focuses on tax controversies and has dealt with hundreds of voluntary disclosures. "What the IRS has done here represents a sound and appropriate exercise of discretion in carving out a very large group of people — American citizens who have lived outside of the U.S. for years and who owe little or no tax."
The voluntary disclosure programs - the current one opened in January and does not have a scheduled end - offer lower penalties than would be assessed in an audit, plus amnesty from criminal prosecution. But the penalties remain steep - currently 27.5 percent of the highest account balance. This is especially so for those who failed to file the FBAR form, but owed no or minimal U.S. tax.
The new streamlined rules will also allay fears over the fate of foreign retirement plans, such as the Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans. Tax treaties often allow for income deferral, but taxpayers are supposed to elect to do this on what tax lingo calls, "a timely basis." Expats or dual citizens who weren't up-to-date on their U.S. tax filings obviously missed that timing. The streamlined procedures for low-risk Americans abroad will allow those who have foreign retirement accounts to make a late election, thus allowing them to get back into the tax system without fear of losing their retirement nest eggs to back taxes, interest and penalties.
"For the school teacher or vet in Canada, it means their retirement savings are safe," Michel says.
VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE WINDOW
At the same time as the IRS announced the easing of requirements for low-risk American expats, it's tightening the noose on taxpayers with offshore accounts who have attempted to evade the requirements.
Under existing law, if a taxpayer challenges disclosure of tax information by a foreign government in a foreign court - say Switzerland - that taxpayer is required to notify the Justice Department of the appeal, but the rule had been without teeth.
"By my own fairly broad, but anecdotal, experience, I am convinced there are many Americans who have tried to prevent disclosure of foreign accounts by going to court in Switzerland or wherever," Michel says. "Now there's a process where if someone initiates a voluntary disclosure only after losing in Switzerland, they become ineligible for the program."
While the foreign legal proceedings may be secret, he says, all the IRS has to do is incorporate a simple question into the disclosure process - and if you lie, you could not only be kicked out of the program, but prosecuted for perjury.
"I think this will prevent a lot of what's been going on behind closed doors when Americans have been challenging disclosures abroad, and if they lose running to the IRS before their name gets turned over," Michel says.
The IRS also put taxpayers on notice that while the current voluntary disclosure program is open-ended, it could cut off certain taxpayers' eligibility once the U.S. government had taken action against their financial institution. As the U.S. government pursues foreign banks to turn over details of their American clients' accounts, this could flush out more assets stashed abroad in advance of any deals reached with those banks.
(Editing by Lauren Young and Phil Berlowitz)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
If you are a “low compliance risk” and you have NOT been filing we invite you to enter the U.S. tax system at no penalty. They have not defined “low compliance risk”. If you read the announcement carefully you will see that tax liabilities of less than $1500 are not a guarantee of being a “low compliance risk”. It appears that the IRS is reserving the right to decide that someone is NOT a low compliance risk – possibly bumping them into OVDI. It looks as though the “low compliance risk” determination will be based on your activities and not your income.
Conclusion: Although this IRS announcement has the potential to be good news, it may end up meaning very little. What is needed is an amnesty with clear guidelines and NOT something where eligibility is subject to the discretion of the IRS.
I was especially interested to see what perspective you would be getting from those east cost attorneys that you consulted with. I think you represented the subject fairly and did a pretty good job with the core story. Yes, there is “some” relief for “some expats”, but I think it may be more narrowly drawn then Scott Michel, president of Caplin & Drysdale in Washington really understands yet.
I am sure you must be aware,that there are varying opinions about what these new provisions mean, and some are unanswerable until the September 1st guidelines are released. I am taking my time before developing a fully formed opinion, as “the devil will be in those details” yet to come.
However, I notice that there are already conflicts with the newest version of the 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program announced on the same day. (OVDP) See FAQ 52.2 where they still want a 5% penalty out of the most innocent of innocent, “Foreign non residents who did not know they were U.S. Citizens”.
Let that sink in for a minute.
They want 5% of the world wide assets of those who could NOT possibly know they were U.S. Citizens, as they were accidental Americans by the lottery of birth, and yet the IRS is quite happy to take that from them so they can “come clean”? Hummm… That sure doesn’t fit well with IR-2012-65 relief narrative announced on the very same day and of which you write! Do we have two separate IRS departments working at cross purposes or not communicating? Or have the rules become so complex that even they do not understand them? Maybe to both!
Here is how a well known Canadian cross border tax group, Moody’s looks at this program. There are many many unanswered questions. http://bit.ly/MEC9gG
Also, a well known law professor and ex DOJ prosecutor in Texas, Jack Townsend, has some observations worth considering along with good comments from some minnows who are not covered by these limited provisions. http://bit.ly/LWK5ZX
The BIG question for me, is where is some reasonable relief for the minnow new immigrants who had no idea that they were entering an offshore tax trap when they got their visas. The State Department does not tell them anything of their FBAR obligations in the “Welcome to America” package they get. They are still waiting for someone in the media to understand their dilemmas on how to become compliant with all the Fwhat? forms! (FBAR and FATCA)without losing a BIG chunk of their hides and home country family assets. Their’s is a BIG untold story.


Follow Reuters