U.S. officials arrive for deserter who hid in Sweden

STOCKHOLM Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:34am EDT

Undated U.S. Air Force handout photo shows David Hemler. REUTERS/U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations/Handout

Undated U.S. Air Force handout photo shows David Hemler.

Credit: Reuters/U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations/Handout

Related Topics

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - U.S. air force investigators have arrived in Sweden to confirm the identity of a deserter who lived secretly in the Nordic state for almost 30 years, the man's lawyer said on Friday.

David Hemler stepped forward two weeks ago and revealed his identity to a local newspaper. He said he had deserted from a U.S. air force base in Germany in 1984 aged 21 and hitchhiked to Sweden where he lived under an assumed identity.

The 49-year-old, twice married with three children in Sweden, said he came forward because he wanted to see his parents in the United States and wanted his children to see their grandparents.

Two officials from the U.S. air force base in Ramstein, Germany, including a crime investigator, have arrived in Sweden and on Thursday met Hemler's lawyer Emma Persson along with an official from the U.S. embassy, Persson told Reuters.

"They want to do a DNA test and take fingerprints to check his identity. He is ready to do that because he wants to show that he is who he says he is," she said.

"They want him to hand himself over and go to court," she said, adding Hemler had not agreed to that. "They were clear that there would be some sort of punishment."

Hemler was quoted by newspaper Dagens Nyheter on Friday as saying he wanted guarantees on the maximum punishment.

"For the sake of my wife, my children and my parents I cannot risk being in jail for a long time," he said.

He said he did not feel that he should suffer any penalty for deserting as the 28 years of separation from his family was punishment enough.

The U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations has Hemler listed as one its eight most wanted fugitives on its website.

Hemler said he deserted after getting involved with a pacifist church and becoming disillusioned with the policies of former U.S. President Ronald Reagan.

He hitchhiked via Denmark to Sweden where he settled down under an assumed name, revealing his true identity to no one.

He told Sweden's TV4 that he had visited Sweden twice before deserting and sympathized with the politics of then Prime Minister Olof Palme, who was opposed to falling under the influence of the United States or former Soviet Union.

Hemler's brother has told U.S. media that the family accepts that Hemler is genuine and is happy he has returned.

(Reporting by Patrick Lannin; Editing by Pravin Char)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Metac wrote:
So all it takes to get into the top ten air force fugitive list is to desert? There should probably be some sort of statute of limitations on this. It is a giant waste of taxpayer money to even deal with this guy. They are sending special investigators, will probably try to extradite him and waste more money on a trial and then the cost of having him locked up. What exactly will this gain us as a country? Just write it off as not being cost effective.

Jun 29, 2012 10:58am EDT  --  Report as abuse
frapper wrote:
A twice-married deserter who wants to see his mommy. Watch Obama pardon him. A President who is a coward and hater of the military.

Jun 29, 2012 2:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
txguy2112 wrote:
It takes more than deserting to make the top 10 most wanted. There is more involved than we are being told.

Jul 01, 2012 11:02am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.