Sponsored Links

Going green could add $31bn to UK economy by 2015

Related Topics

Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:35am EDT

* Green business accounts for a third of UK growth

* CBI sees trade gap decline by 800 mln pounds

LONDON, July 5 (Reuters) - The low-carbon products and services sector, often referred to as green business, could contribute 20 billion pounds ($31.16 billion) to Britain's economy by 2015, the country's leading business lobby said on Thursday.

"Get our energy and climate change policies right, and we can add 20 billion pounds extra to our economy and knock 0.8 billion pounds off the trade gap, all within the lifetime of this Parliament," said John Cridland, director general of the Confederation of British Energy (CBI).

But the CBI warned that if the government does not adopt the right policies the sector will not reach its full potential, putting 400 million pounds in net green sector exports at risk in 2014/15.

The CBI wants the government to meet its fourth carbon budget, which sets goals for Britain's carbon-cutting programme, to ensure its current electricity market reform gives long-term investment signals. It also wants the government to reduce complexity in low-carbon regulation.

"The so-called 'choice' between going green or going for growth is a false one. We are increasingly hearing that politicians are for one or the other, when in reality, with the right policies in place, green business will be a major pillar of our future growth," Cridland said.

The CBI estimates that over a third of all UK growth in 2011/12 may have come from green business, a market which was globally worth 3.3 trillion pounds in 2010/11.

The sector now employs nearly one million people in the UK, the group said.

($1 = 0.6419 British pounds) (Reporting by Karolin Schaps. Editing by Jane Merriman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Lftrsuk wrote:
Do John Cridland and UK manufacturing companies appreciate that in one or two generations, nations grabbing for the vestiges of unaffordable hydrocarbons, will threaten world order, peace and stability. As the lights start to sputter, the shout will go up for inherently safe breeder reactors to be deployed worldwide.

By then, the accelerating energy demands and increasing economic power of the (now) developing world, will ensure they get their share – even at the expense of forcing a decline in living standards of those in the (now) developed world.

The simple answer to avoid conflict and meet the future emissions-free energy needs of the UK and every nation on Earth, is the widespread deployment of breeder reactors. The arithmetic is simple; the sums add up; the fuel is available until the end of time; no other energy technology is capable of completely replacing hydrocarbons.

Google lftrsuk to see if you can get behind this technology.

Jul 05, 2012 9:55am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.