Asian nations want to sink South Korea whale hunt plan

PANAMA CITY Thu Jul 5, 2012 4:08pm EDT

Protesters demonstrate next to an inflatable whale and a teepee with painted whales and dolphins outside the building where the International Whaling Commission (IWC) is being held during this week in Panama City July 4, 2012. Greenpeace, Surfers for Cetaceans and others organizations protested after the decision to create a whale sanctuary in the South Atlantic was rejected on Monday during the 64th annual meeting of the IWC, according to local and international media. REUTERS/Carlos Jasso

Protesters demonstrate next to an inflatable whale and a teepee with painted whales and dolphins outside the building where the International Whaling Commission (IWC) is being held during this week in Panama City July 4, 2012. Greenpeace, Surfers for Cetaceans and others organizations protested after the decision to create a whale sanctuary in the South Atlantic was rejected on Monday during the 64th annual meeting of the IWC, according to local and international media.

Credit: Reuters/Carlos Jasso

Photo

Our outpost in space

The surreal life aboard the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

PANAMA CITY (Reuters) - South Korea's proposal to resume whaling for scientific research has angered other Asian countries and conservationists who said the practice would skirt a global ban on whale hunting.

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard said she would fight the proposal, which was made on Wednesday at a meeting of the International Whaling Commission in Panama City, while the United States said it planned to take the matter up with the South Korean government.

Critics said the move to pursue whaling in domestic waters was modeled on Japan's introduction of scientific whaling after the IWC imposed a 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling.

Japan says it has a right to monitor the whales' impact on its fishing industry. South Korea says whaling is a long-standing cultural tradition.

Anti-whaling activists regularly harass Japanese vessels engaging in their annual whale hunt in the Southern Ocean off Australia and Antarctica, with the two sides sometimes clashing violently. At least one activist boat has sunk in recent years.

In Seoul, a government official said South Korea abided by international regulations and it would be up to the IWC to assess its proposal.

"We've submitted a proposal to the IWC's Scientific Committee to resume scientific whaling in our waters and will await the committee's assessment," said an official at the Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Ministry.

"If it says it is not adequate in their assessment of the legitimacy of scientific research, we'll make further preparations."

South Korea said its fishermen were complaining that growing whale populations were depleting fishing stocks, an assertion the World Wildlife Fund said had no scientific basis.

Environmental activists dismissed the term scientific whaling as a thinly veiled ruse to conduct commercial whaling.

"It's an absolute shock this happened at this meeting and it's an absolute disgrace because to say that hunting whales is happening in the name of science is just wrong," James Lorenz from Greenpeace told Australian television. "Essentially, it's commercial whaling in another form."

The minke whales that South Korea proposes hunting are considered endangered, the World Wildlife Fund said in a statement.

Former Australian Environment Minister Ian Campbell, now on the board of the anti-whaling activist group Sea Shepherd, said the organization would "have to get organized to go out to the oceans and save the whales off South Korea."

AUSTRALIA TO PROTEST

Australia has long opposed Japanese whaling and Gillard said it would lodge a diplomatic protest against South Korea's move.

"We will make our voices heard today," she told reporters. "Our ambassador will speak to counterparts in South Korea at the highest levels of the South Korea government and indicate Australia's opposition to this decision."

Australia has filed a complaint against Japan at the International Court of Justice in The Hague to stop scientific whaling. A decision is expected in 2013 or later.

New Zealand Foreign Minister Murray McCully said the announcement was a setback to global conservation efforts as whales in its waters were already targeted by Japan.

"The portrayal of this initiative as a 'scientific' program will have no more credibility than the so-called scientific program conducted by Japan, which has long been recognized as commercial whaling in drag," he said in a statement.

In Washington, the State Department repeated that the United States remained committed to the moratorium on commercial whaling.

"We're concerned about South Korea's announcement," State Department spokeswoman Patrick Ventrell said. "We plan to discuss this with the South Korean government."

Panama's delegate to the IWC conference, Tomas Guardia, denounced the South Korean proposal "because it goes against the ban ... we don't support whale hunting under any circumstances".

Twitter was awash with condemnations.

"I don't care what justification you give," wrote a user identifying herself as Savannah, from Australia. "It's crap. Stop killing whales."

Many Koreans view whale meat as a delicacy. Murals some 5,000 years old depicting whaling have been excavated around Ulsan, center of the whaling industry on the southeastern coast since the late 19th century.

Officials say that before South Korea joined the moratorium in 1986, its average annual catch was 600 whales, most of which were consumed. Whaling is now subject to prosecution and punishable by a jail or fines, but meat is available from mostly minke that get caught in fishing nets "by accident" or wash ashore.

(Reporting by Elida Moreno in Panama City, Jack Kim and Laeticia Ock in Seoul, James Grubel and Maggie Lu YueYang in Canberra and Andrew Quinn in Washington; Writing by Ron Popeski; Editing by Daniel Magnowski and Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
zendawg2212 wrote:
Money speaks louder than words. Boycott products from countries that hunt whales. Video the whale killings and post them on the Web. Let the people worldwide decide if they want to buy products from those countries.

Jul 05, 2012 9:16am EDT  --  Report as abuse
InlandTaipan wrote:
S Korea, Japan and any other so called civilized nations are just absolutely despicable to continue this kind of mass murdering, these worthless, illiterate, stone cave peoples are still lving in the middle ages if they think this is in any way OK.
All of these nations are loathsome pieces of crap for continuing this form of mass murdering, to these giant, lovely, wonderful mammals.
That means they are related to people somewhere in their past, just in case you people didn’t know.
I, nor my family will never buy aanything produced or made in these despicable murdering countries, nor will any of my friends.

Jul 05, 2012 9:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
jhvance wrote:
Cease the slaughter of all cetaceans, in all oceans across the globe — there simply is NO justification for continuation in the killing of any whale from any species or sub-species for “research”, much less the resumption of industrial whaling as some countries apparently would hope to achieve.

Furthermore, impose stringent global mandates across both civilian and military ships to control the improper use of all high-frequency, high-power sonar and other underwater technologies which disrupt marine mammal communications and inflict damage on their highly sensitive acoustic reception organs. Along with motorized shipping, the proliferation and profligate use of such technologies at greater and greater intensities over the past century for navigation, naval threat detection and seismic exploration has seriously degraded the natural “quiet” ocean background in which all marine mammal species evolved over millions of years before the rise of homo sapiens.

This obliteration of a quiet ocean environment has directly and negatively impacted the ability to communicate and sustain the capability of most species of marine mammals in successful hunting for food (individually or in packs or pods); it has seriously interfered with social coordination and the associated interactions among individuals (e.g., finding mates) or groups (e.g., cooperative rearing of young and adolescent members) which are vital to the species’ long-term survival.

Jul 05, 2012 10:31am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.