Russia to suspend new arms to Syria: agencies

MOSCOW Mon Jul 9, 2012 6:50pm EDT

An undated handout photo distributed by the Syrian News Agency (SANA) on July 8, 2012, shows Syrian armed forces during a live ammunitions exercise in an undisclosed location. REUTERS/SANA/Handout

An undated handout photo distributed by the Syrian News Agency (SANA) on July 8, 2012, shows Syrian armed forces during a live ammunitions exercise in an undisclosed location.

Credit: Reuters/SANA/Handout

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia will not deliver fighter planes or other new weapons to Syria while the situation there remains unresolved, the deputy director of a body that supervises Moscow's arms trade was quoted as saying on Monday.

"While the situation in Syria is unstable, there will be no new deliveries of arms there," Vyacheslav Dzirkaln told journalists at the Farnborough Airshow in Britain, Russia's Interfax news agency reported.

The refusal to send more arms to Syria could signal the strongest move yet by Moscow to distance itself from Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, whom it has defended in the U.N. Security Council from harsher sanctions.

It could also scuttle up to $4 billion of outstanding contracts, including fighter jets and air-defense systems that were expected to be delivered this year.

A spokesman for Dzirkaln's Federal Service for Military Technical Co-operation would not confirm the deputy director's comments when contacted by telephone. Reuters was awaiting for a response to requested written questions.

In Washington, White House spokeswoman Erin Pelton said it would be a positive development if confirmed.

"We refer you to Russian authorities for confirmation," she said. "If it is truly Russia's intention to halt arms sales to Syria, then we would laud this step and commend Russia for this measure, which would send a strong signal to the Assad regime."

"We have long called on all nations to cease supplying this regime with weapons, given its continued use against the Syrian people."

Although legal, Russia's arms trade with Syria has fueled concerns that Moscow is supplying Assad with weapons being used against protesters taking part in an armed uprising against him.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said the arms Moscow delivers cannot be used in civil conflicts and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has said the supplies are defensive weapons sold in contracts signed long ago.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has termed Russian statements that the weapons are unrelated to the violence in Syria "patently untrue" and Washington has called the delivery of a shipment of heavy Russian weapons "reprehensible".


Dzirkaln was quoted as saying that Russia, one of Syria's main weapons suppliers, would not be delivering a shipment of 36 Yak-130 fighter planes, a contract for which was reportedly signed at the end of last year.

"In the current situation, talking about deliveries of airplanes to Syria is premature," he said.

Rosoboronexport, Russia's monopoly arms exporter, would not comment on Dzirkaln's remarks, which were also reported by the Russian state news agency RIA.

"We understand the position of (the agency), but we are a separate organization and will not comment," said spokesman Vyacheslav Davidenko.

Syria's arms-trade ties with Moscow date back to the Soviet era. It has previously signed contracts worth billions of dollars and hosts a Mediterranean supply-and-repair facility that is Russia's only naval base outside the former Soviet Union.

A Russian analyst said Moscow had already distanced itself from Assad.

"Russia has stopped signing new contracts with Syria and is delaying the shipments of already signed contracts," said Ruslan Aliyev, an expert on the Russian-Syria arms trade at the Moscow-based defense think-tank, CAST.

"It's basically a political decision based on Moscow's view of Syria."

Russia faced Western criticism last month after Clinton said Russian attack helicopters were on the way to Syria. Moscow said they were part of an old contract and that it only provided weaponry that could be used against external aggression.

"Previously, we were fulfilling old contracts, including repairs of the machines," Dzirkaln said. "Until the situation stabilizes, we will not carry out any new arms deliveries."

(Additional reporting By Nastassia Astrasheuskaya in Moscow and Matt Spetalnick in Washington; Writing by Thomas Grove; Editing by Pravin Char and David Brunnstrom)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
Amack wrote:
If everyone stopped supplying weapons to them, they would have to fight with sticks and stones and then the war would stop.

Jul 09, 2012 11:55am EDT  --  Report as abuse
owl905 wrote:
The timing is right to let the focus shift away from Moscow. For all the squawking by Russia and China at Clinton’s rhetoric, giving a little ground makes a lot more common sense than providing more examples. Watch the bear, tho – it would take nothing more than an incident or excuse to resume shipments. The orders aren’t cancelled, they’re sequestered.

The fate of the three helicopters aboard the Alaed is a mystery. Tracking data has gone stale, and the lone blog quote suggest the helicopters were removed from ship and the Alaed’s voyage to Vladivostok has been delayed or cancelled. Given the problems of the Russian cargo ship Star, it doesn’t make shipping sense for the Alaed not to go – the two week transit is less than the repair time.

Jul 09, 2012 12:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Slammy wrote:
I wonder if Russia will continue to honor the contracts if the Al Assad regime is ousted from power. Given that the contracts are supposed to be with the Syrian government and not that of the ruling family, one would think existing contracts will still be good even if a “Western” friendly regime takes it places.

Jul 09, 2012 1:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

A tourist takes a plunge as she swims at Ngapali Beach, a popular tourist site, in the Thandwe township of the Rakhine state, October 6, 2013. Picture taken October 6, 2013. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun (MYANMAR - Tags: SOCIETY) - RTR3FOI0

Where do you want to go?

We look at when to take trips, budget considerations and the popularity of multigenerational family travel.   Video