House bill looks to stop future "Solyndras"

WASHINGTON Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:34pm EDT

Republican U.S. presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney speaks at the former Solyndra headquarters and factory in Fremont, California, May 31, 2012. REUTERS/Beck Diefenbach

Republican U.S. presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney speaks at the former Solyndra headquarters and factory in Fremont, California, May 31, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Beck Diefenbach

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican lawmakers unveiled legislation on Tuesday to end a program offering loan support for clean energy companies, keeping alive the issue of a massive loan to solar panel maker Solyndra, which subsequently filed for bankruptcy.

Solyndra received more than $500 million in government support and has become a political talking point for Republicans in the run-up to November's election and an embarrassment to the administration of President Barack Obama.

After more than a year of hearings and the release of hundreds of thousands of documents in their probe, Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce committee contend the Obama administration was driven by "politics and ideology" when it awarded a loan to Solyndra.

Draft legislation, co-authored by energy committee chairman Fred Upton and oversight subcommittee chairman Cliff Stearns, would block approval of any new loan requests from clean energy companies. It would also require written guidance from the Treasury Department before approval of any pending applications.

The Obama administration has rejected claims that politics played any role in its decision to support Solyndra.

In response to the proposed legislation, the Energy Department said it has continuously worked to strengthen the oversight of the loan program and pointed out that Congress set aside $10 billion to cover loan losses when the program was created.

"As we have consistently said, there is a degree of risk inherent in helping new, innovative technologies get off the ground," the department said in a statement.

"Just because there is risk here, that doesn't mean we should throw up our hands and cede the jobs of the future to China, Spain, or anywhere else."

The loan program that funded Solyndra expired last year but the department still has $34 billion in another clean energy loan program that has so far backed three nuclear projects.

With the Democrat-controlled Senate unlikely to consider similar legislation, the bill will probably stall in the House, though it would provide fodder for Republicans on the campaign trail.

Under the House bill, the Energy Department would be required to submit a report to Congress outlining its decision-making process for any new loan aid.

In addition, the legislation would prevent a repeat of the department's decision to restructure the Solyndra loan when the company was facing financial trouble, which placed taxpayers behind private investors in the event of bankruptcy.

Since the failure of Solyndra, other companies that received financial support from the government have filed for bankruptcy or encountered financial woes, including Abound Solar Inc and Beacon Power Corp. (Reporting by Ayesha Rascoe; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
justinolcb wrote:
Solyndra would have never happened if you know who had never been elected… jus’ sayin’ :)
Movin’ Day starts Nov 7

Jul 10, 2012 1:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Hmmm….all the hollering over a measly 500 million, while at the same time we’re tossing 38 –billion!– down the nuclear rathole. Under the banner of “clean energy”, no less.

Jul 10, 2012 2:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
flashrooster wrote:
Why just clean energy? We’ve spent billions and billions subsidizing oil and coal. Damn the Republicans. Why aren’t they trying to do something that might create some jobs instead of ALWAYS playing partisan politics? They are totally worthless. I don’t think they even realize that they’re supposed to be serving a country, not a political party.

Jul 10, 2012 2:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.