Read
- Microsoft unveils Xbox One with Spielberg, Activision tie-up
- Whole neighborhoods razed by Oklahoma tornado that killed 24
|
- White House threatens veto of bill to bypass Obama on Keystone
- Russia moves closer to jail terms for offending religion
- UPDATE 1-Regeneron, Sanofi asthma drug seen as potential game changer
Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
Devastated by tornado
A huge tornado tears through the Oklahoma City suburb of Moore, killing dozens. Slideshow
Nuclear tsunami wall
Safety upgrades designed to prevent a repeat of the Fukushima disaster. Slideshow
Sponsored Links
Super PAC for Senate Democrats triples fundraising haul
WASHINGTON |
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Majority PAC, a "Super PAC" helping Democrats fight for seats in the U.S. Senate, said Thursday it raised $5.4 million in the second quarter of the year, triple its first-quarter haul.
The "super" political action committee had $4.6 million left in cash on hand by the end of June, the figures showed.
In the first three months of the year, Majority PAC raised $1.6 million, with $1 million of that coming from billionaire hedge fund manager James Simons. The group had $2.5 million in cash on hand at the end of March.
Since March, earlier disclosures released because of the group's involvement in Virginia's June 12 primary showed that Majority PAC also received $350,000 from Chicago media magnate Fred Eychaner and $100,000 from film studio Dreamworks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg, both big donors to Democratic President Barack Obama's re-election effort.
Another $100,000 came from Cindy Harrell-Horn, wife of Walt Disney Studios' new chairman Alan Horn. Harrell-Horn also gave the same sum to House Majority PAC, a Super PAC helping elect Democrats to the House of Representatives, according to a May federal disclosure filing.
Majority PAC and House Majority PAC are part of an alliance of outside Democratic spending groups raising unlimited money to support the party's candidates in the multimillion-dollar battle for control of Washington against deep-pocketed Republican outside groups.
Republican groups, vowing to pour hundreds of millions into the races, hope to unseat Obama in the White House, keep the Republican majority in the House and take control of the Senate.
For instance, American Crossroads, one of the most well-heeled Republican Super PACs run by former President George W. Bush aide Karl Rove, has said it planned to spend up to $300 million on this election alongside its sister non-profit Crossroads GPS, and one-third of the cash was to go toward Senate and House races.
"Majority PAC is building momentum and growing stronger each day, and we will be prepared to fight back against Republican attacks all the way to November," Susan McCue, a strategist for the Democratic group, said in a statement. "We are laser focused on specific regions and constituencies."
Republicans need a net gain of four Senate seats to gain a majority in the upper chamber of Congress, while Democrats need a net gain of 25 seats in the House to gain majority there.
Democrats have practically conceded they expect to be outspent by Republican groups, but still hope to keep the gap as narrow as possible.
That has been a struggle in part because many Democratic donors have opposed the existence of Super PACs, spawned by a 2010 Supreme Court decision and able to raise and spend unlimited funds to help politicians.
House Majority PAC on Tuesday said it raised $4.3 million in the second quarter of 2012, with more than $4 million of that still left in cash on hand.
(This story corrects lead to say second quarter, not first three months of the year)
(Editing by Vicki Allen)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
How anyone could vote to keep Obama and his rich buddies in power is disgusting. Obama is more than content to perpetuate this plutocracy while he spoon feeds soundbites of equality to the rest of his ill-informed base to keep them docile.
Your hypocrisy is STUNNING. Did you even read the article? How exactly is a Hollywood producer “buying off” a politician, but a corporation giving hundreds of millions to republican politicians NOT “buying off” them? What do you think Hollywood expects in return for their donation as opposed to what you think a corporation wants in return?
I don’t know if you are really that hypocritical or just flat stupid.



Follow Reuters