New York Post eyes shielding Murdoch talks over chimp cartoon

Sun Jul 15, 2012 4:38pm EDT

CEO of News Corp Rupert Murdoch attends the Allen & Co Media Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho July 13, 2012. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart

CEO of News Corp Rupert Murdoch attends the Allen & Co Media Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho July 13, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Urquhart

Related Topics

(Reuters) - The New York Post is seeking to keep its top editor from having to answer questions in a bias lawsuit about his discussions with media mogul Rupert Murdoch over a published cartoon that appeared to liken President Barack Obama to a chimpanzee.

Calling the February 2009 cartoon "quintessential political speech entitled to the strongest protections of the First Amendment," the newspaper in a court filing late Friday night also said the discussions were irrelevant to the lawsuit brought by Sandra Guzman, a former associate editor.

In November 2009, Guzman, who is black and Puerto Rican, sued the Post, its editor Col Allan and its parent News Corp for alleged discrimination and harassment on the basis of race, gender and national origin, saying she had been fired in retaliation for complaints over inappropriate conduct.

She also claimed to have objected to the cartoon, which referred to the $787 billion federal economic stimulus and depicted a policeman shooting a crazed chimpanzee, a reference to an actual incident in Connecticut.

Many people thought the animal was meant to depict Obama, and Murdoch later apologized to readers.

In a June 29 order, Magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis in Manhattan had ordered Allan, in a two-hour deposition, to answer questions, including over whether he told Murdoch he disagreed with publishing an apology, and whether he thought Murdoch believed it was a mistake to do so.

But in Friday's filing, the defendants argued that the order would let Guzman breach "the heart of the editorial process," and asked District Judge Barbara Jones to reverse it.

The defendants said the cartoon was intended to mock Congress' drafting of stimulus legislation and made no reference to race. They also called Guzman's request "nothing more than a fishing expedition that would invade and chill the editor's and newspaper's First Amendment rights to political expression."

"We have maintained from the very beginning that the New York Post assertion of an editorial privilege was baseless," Guzman's lawyer Kenneth Thompson said in a phone interview on Sunday. "We now look forward to bringing Col Allan back to answer our questions."

The case is Guzman v News Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 09-09323.

(Reporting By Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Gunna Dickson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
Lord_Foxdrake wrote:
The cartoon was racist. It was a pun after the then recent chimp shooting. And it was an attempt to illustrate the President as a gorilla; our “black” president, as a primate.

The question presented is … is racist speech protected? I would argue it is.

However, in terms of this lady’s suit, it might go to a culture of racial insensitivity and be a factor in her harassment claim.

‘Nuff said.

Jul 15, 2012 3:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PAndrews wrote:
A chimpanzee – an animal as intelligent as a small child – was shot dead rather than simply being subdued with an anaesthetic dart. The fact that this tragic event was made fum of in a cartoon is of considerably more concern than the empty speculation as to whether the cartoon might have been about Obama.

Incidentally, the reason why the poor chimpanzee was agitated is because he had just been given the drug Xanax and had responded badly to it.

Do you people have no compassion at all?

Jul 15, 2012 3:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
drmorocco wrote:
Murdoch’s picture at the top of the article could easily be mistaken for Cheetah with glasses and a sweater. I wonder if Murdoch can hold a banana with one foot and peel it with the other?

Jul 15, 2012 4:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.