Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

FDA surveillance operation draws criticism from lawmakers

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:47pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Food and Drug Administration's secret monitoring of its staff raised hackles in Congress on Sunday after lawmakers learned their own offices were apparently targeted by the surveillance operation.

Six current and former FDA scientists and doctors filed a lawsuit in January claiming the agency tried to repress warnings about potential corruption in device reviews.

Documents detailing the surveillance operation suggest it was large-scale and that the FDA kept a list of targets including lawmakers and their aides, The New York Times reported on Sunday.

"It is absolutely unacceptable for the FDA to be spying on employees who reach out to members of Congress to expose abuses or wrongdoing in government agencies," said Representative Chris Van Hollen of Maryland.

Van Hollen, who is a member of the Democratic leadership in the House of Representatives, was named in the documents as a target, the paper reported.

The whistleblowers suing the FDA worked for an office in the agency responsible for reviewing applications to sell medical devices in the United States.

The FDA acknowledged monitoring the communications of five staff members it suspected had leaked confidential details about a device under review.

"The agency had evidence suggesting that they might be responsible for the unauthorized disclosure of proprietary information," said FDA spokeswoman Erica Jefferson.

Jefferson denied that lawmakers' offices were targeted and said the surveillance was limited to communications on government-owned computers.

Among the devices the FDA employees say they flagged as dangerous was a computer-aided detection device used with mammograms. The FDA approved the device for sale despite staff warnings that it could cause significant harm to women, according to the whistleblowers.

"The FDA should be focused on resolving these complaints rather than retaliating against its employees," Van Hollen said.

The whistleblowers' lawsuit claims the FDA retaliated by failing to renew employment contracts and by alleging criminal wrongdoing. Four of the six plaintiffs are no longer working at the FDA.

"The FDA has a lot of explaining to do in the weeks ahead," said Republican Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa, another lawmaker reportedly targeted in the surveillance operation.

(Reporting by Jason Lange, Andy Sullivan and Anna Yukhananov; Editing by Maureen Bavdek)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
alrphfool wrote:
Its ubiquitous, insidious and almost complete, Welcome to your worst nightmare citizens of the once great nation of the USA.

Jul 15, 2012 7:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
WildBillWB wrote:
“raised hackles in Congress on Sunday after lawmakers learned their own offices were apparently targeted by the surveillance operation.”

If that bothers you stop passing laws contrary to the protections provided by the U.S. Constitution.

Jul 15, 2012 10:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Minarchian wrote:
Our entire government has gone rogue and are on a rampage against the people.

Jul 15, 2012 10:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.