Senate Democrats temper Obama plan on dividends taxes

WASHINGTON Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:43pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A plan by Senate Democrats to let income tax rates rise for wealthier Americans takes a softer line on taxing dividends than President Barack Obama's proposal, easing the tax load on the rich.

The draft plan, circulating among lobbyists and confirmed by Senate Democrats, mostly embodies Obama's proposal to extend lower tax rates for households earning up to $250,000 a year when the so-called Bush-era tax cuts expire at the end of 2012, while ending the cuts for higher incomes.

But with the plan, dividends would be taxed at half the rate proposed by the Democratic president.

Obama's 2013 budget proposed bringing tax rates for dividends up to those for ordinary income, which would result in a tax rate of about 40 percent for the highest-income groups.

Senate Democrats' plan would raise dividend taxes from the current 15 percent rate to 20 percent, according to a summary.

The plan comes amid an intense lobbying push, with dividend-paying companies like Verizon Communications, United Parcel Service and Southern Company among those pressing their case with influential lawmakers in recent months.

Chief executives from shareholder-owned electric companies, including Southern, Xcel Energy and NextEra Energy, are making the rounds with lawmakers in Washington this week.

The Democratic-controlled Senate will vote on the legislation within weeks, accelerating a partisan battle over tax rates ahead of the November 6 presidential and congressional elections. Obama highlighted the issue last week, pitching a tax fairness theme to draw a contrast with Republicans.

"Many members of the other party believe that prosperity comes from the top down, so that if we spend trillions more on tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, that will somehow unleash jobs and economic growth," Obama said last week.

The Democratic proposal will hit a roadblock in the House of Representatives, where Republicans in control favor extending all of the lower tax rates, including to the higher income groups.

STICKIER TAX ISSUES

Lower tax rates on income and investments enacted under Republican president George W. Bush in 2001 and 2003 will expire at the end of the year unless Congress takes action. Obama agreed to extend all the rates in 2010 for two years.

Sean West, an analyst for investors at Eurasia Group, said most Democrats - including Obama - want to put off the stickier tax issues until next year when they attempt to overhaul the tax code.

"Congress is going to get a stop-gap solution and the dividends are going to catch a ride," West said.

West pointed out that when Obama made his pitch last week, he backed only a one-year extension.

At the same time, rhetoric from both sides is heating up, with some lawmakers suggesting they would let all tax rates rise if they do not get their way.

On top of individual income and dividend tax rates, lower rates on the capital gains and estate taxes will also end on December 31 if lawmakers take no action.

The Democratic proposal mirrors Obama on these issues. It would raise the capital gains tax to 20 percent from 15 percent for top earners, and boost the estate tax to 45 percent from 35 percent.

Lawmakers are not expected to move on these tax issues until after the elections. This looming deadline, along with pending automatic spending cuts and a potential for the government to hit its borrowing limit, has been dubbed the "fiscal cliff."

Non-partisan congressional budget-scorers say doing nothing could push the U.S. economy back into a recession in the first half of next year.

"It is crazy to think that they actually would go off the edge," West said.

(Reporting by Kim Dixon; Editing by Fred Barbash and Vicki Allen)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
speaker12 wrote:
Poor Obama. He has no idea of what is going on. Tax, tax, tax so we can improve the give away programs. Punish those who try to make a living. Why is the job market so bad? Obama knows but can’t figure out how to stop the loss. You know, he may not even care. What a guy.

Jul 16, 2012 4:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
UnPartisan wrote:
“The draft plan, circulating among lobbyists and confirmed by Senate Democrats, mostly embodies Obama’s proposal to extend lower tax rates for households earning up to $250,000 a year when the so-called Bush-era tax cuts expire at the end of 2012, while ending the cuts for higher incomes.”

The Bush tax cuts expired in 2010. The current tax cuts are the Obama, Reid, and Pelosi tax cuts because they are the ones that passed them in 2010. Had they not passed them, they would no longer exist. It is their tax cuts and not Bush’s.

Jul 16, 2012 5:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
RoaringFish wrote:
UnPartisan wrote:
“The Bush tax cuts expired in 2010. The current tax cuts are the Obama, Reid, and Pelosi tax cuts because they are the ones that passed them in 2010.”

You really have a short, selective, partisan memory, don’t you?

Let me educate you on recent history:

July22nd, 2010
“The House speaker told reporters Thursday *she is adamantly against continuing the tax cuts, which expire at year’s end, for those making more than $250,000*. “My stance is that the Bush-era tax cuts contributed to the deficit, did not create any jobs, and that they should be repealed,” said Pelosi, a California Democrat.”

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/07/22/pelosi-let-bush-tax-cuts-expire-for-the-wealthy/

December 7th, 2010
“The House of Representatives, still controlled by Democrats until the new Congress is sworn in next month, passed Obama’s plan by a clear majority last week. But Republicans blocked the legislation in the Senate at the weekend and said they would rather see everyone’s taxes rise than agree to scrapping the cuts for the wealthy.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/06/barack-obama-bush-tax-cuts

They are still the Bush Tax Cuts, because Republicans have shown that they are willing to hold middle-class America to ransom to protect their favoured 1%. They are still the Bush Tax Cuts because Republicans blocked legislation to let them expire.

Notice how I can back up my position by reference to the historic record, while all you can do is lie? You should think about that.

@BIGEEE1 ~ you are a spammer.

Jul 17, 2012 6:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.