Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rebel fighter training

Training new recruits to Congo's M23 insurgent group.  Slideshow 

Photo

Running while blind

Blind or visually impaired students compete in blind track and field tournament.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Apple must run "Samsung did not copy iPad" ads: report

Related Topics

A visitor looks around behind Samsung Electronics' Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet displayed for customers at a registration desk at South Korean mobile carrier KT's headquarters in Seoul December 9, 2011. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji

A visitor looks around behind Samsung Electronics' Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet displayed for customers at a registration desk at South Korean mobile carrier KT's headquarters in Seoul December 9, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Kim Hong-Ji

LONDON | Thu Jul 19, 2012 5:04am EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - Apple has been instructed by a British judge to run ads saying that Samsung did not copy its design for the iPad in the latest twist in the ongoing patent battles between the two tech giants, according to Bloomberg.

Judge Birss, who ruled last week that Samsung did not infringe Apple's designs because its Galaxy Tab tablets were not "as cool" as the U.S. company's iPad, said Apple should publish a notice on its website and in British newspapers to correct any impression that the South Korean company copied Apple, Bloomberg said.

The notice, which is in effect an advertisement for Samsung, should remain on Apple's website for at least six months, the report said.

The judge, however, rejected Samsung's request that Apple be forbidden from continuing to claim that its design rights had been infringed, saying that Apple was entitled to hold the opinion, the news agency said.

Samsung said in a statement after the hearing: "Should Apple continue to make excessive legal claims based on such generic designs, innovation in the industry could be harmed and consumer choice unduly limited."

Apple declined to comment on Judge Birss's instruction.

(Reporting by Paul Sandle; Editing by Mark Potter)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Animated wrote:
So Apple’s “ad” will read: ‘Obviously Samsung did not copy the Ipad because it is not as cool’

Jul 19, 2012 8:15am EDT  --  Report as abuse
TonyTosh wrote:
Thats pushing it

Jul 19, 2012 8:38am EDT  --  Report as abuse
CITADEL4U wrote:
APPLE should tell Britain to stick it.
Remove all Apple products from England, and sue England in the World’s Court for damages. The WTO has not agreed with this stupid British Ruling.

Let the British suffer for their courts wrong decision.
They don’t deserve the Apple products to be made available to them.
If they want them, make them go across the channel. Maybe the French will sell the Brits a few.

Jul 19, 2012 6:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.