Senator McCain stands by Hillary Clinton aide

WASHINGTON Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:27am EDT

U.S. Senators John McCain (R-AZ) (C), John Cornyn (R-TX) (L) and Roger Wicker (R-MI) hold a news conference to discuss ''The Obama Administration's national security leaks'' in the Capitol in Washington June 26, 2012. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. Senators John McCain (R-AZ) (C), John Cornyn (R-TX) (L) and Roger Wicker (R-MI) hold a news conference to discuss ''The Obama Administration's national security leaks'' in the Capitol in Washington June 26, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

Photo

Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senator John McCain publicly supported a senior Obama administration official in denouncing concerns by a group of House Republicans that her family may have connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, which they fear may be trying to gain access to high levels of the U.S. government.

Former Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann and four other lawmakers in the House of Representatives asked the State Department's inspector general's office last month to investigate the possibility that Huma Abedin, a top aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, had family ties to the Islamist political group.

Their June 13 letter asserted that the State Department had recently taken action "enormously favorable" to the Muslim Brotherhood and that its interests could pose a security risk for the United States.

The letter cited a security study by an outside group alleging that three members' of Abedin's family, including her father who died two decades ago, and her mother and brother were linked to operatives or organizations of the Muslim Brotherhood.

"Her position affords her routine access to the secretary and policymaking," the letter said.

A State Department spokesman said Clinton "very much values" Abedin's "wise counsel and support" and called the allegations preposterous.

McCain, the 2008 Republican presidential nominee, took to the Senate floor and called the assertion an "unwarranted and unfounded attack on an honorable woman" and public servant whose family had never been shown in any way to "harm or threaten" the United States.

Bachmann said in a statement on Wednesday that the letter to the State Department and similar correspondence to inspectors general at the Pentagon, Homeland Security and Justice departments are "unfortunately being distorted."

"The intention of the letters was to outline the serious national security concerns I had and ask for answers to questions regarding the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical groups access to top Obama administration officials," Bachmann said.

She said she would continue to speak out on the issue.

(Reporting by John Crawley; editing by Christopher Wilson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (14)
ANewAmerica wrote:
McCain doesn’t know what the heck is going on around him. He lost it back in Vietnam, he’s a flip flopping non-issue. The lights are on and dim but nobody is home…..

Jul 19, 2012 1:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Smokingman wrote:
I glad to see that someone in Washington is finally taking a stand against the hyper-partisan paranoia and insanity. I’m also pleasantly surprised it was a Republican. Thanks to this brief glimmer of sanity and decency from McCain, I might even rethink my view that they’re all foaming at the mouth crazy.

Jul 19, 2012 5:31am EDT  --  Report as abuse
BigTex2 wrote:
I think McCain has had the hots for Hillary for years…this is his last chance to get in her pants.

Jul 19, 2012 6:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.