CPSC bans sale of Buckyballs magnetic toys, cites hazard

WASHINGTON Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:00pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) ordered a halt to sale of Buckyballs magnetic toys on Wednesday, calling them a serious hazard in the panel's first stop-sale order in 11 years.

The commission ordered distributor Maxfield and Oberton Holdings of New York to halt sales because injuries to children who had swallowed them had continued to rise, the CPSC said in a complaint.

"Notwithstanding the labeling, warnings and efforts taken by (Maxfield and Oberton), ingestion incidents continued to rise because warnings are ineffective," the CPSC said. It said the magnets presented a "substantial product hazard."

Buckyballs are small, powerful round rare earth magnets that are sold as toys and desktop accessories. When children swallow them they can pinch or trap intestines and require surgery to remove, the CPSC said.

Since they went on the market in 2009, numerous incidents involving children have been reported. In January 2011, a 4-year-old boy had his intestine perforated after he swallowed three magnets he thought were chocolate candy, the complaint said.

Although the commission issued a safety alert in November, it has received more than a dozen reports since then of children ingesting the magnets, with many requiring surgery, it said.

More than 2 million Buckyballs and at least 200,000 Buckycubes, a similar cube-shaped magnet, have been sold in the United States. They were made in China, the complaint said.

Maxfield and Oberton must cease importation and distribution of the magnets and issue refunds as part of the ruling, according to the panel's complaint. The company must also tell retailers to stop distributing the toys.

Maxfield and Oberton founder and Chief Executive Craig Zucker said his company marketed the magnets to adults and teenagers and the CPSC held the "absurd position" that warnings did not work.

"We will vigorously fight this action taken by President Obama's handpicked agency," he said in an emailed statement.

A CPSC spokesman said the stop-sale order was the first by the commission in 11 years.

(Reporting by Ian Simpson; editing by Todd Eastham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
Malkut wrote:
Warnings are not enough! Thank you government! Now get rid of stoves because they can heat water to the boiling point, and children can spill it on themselves. It happens! Ban rocks, because they can be swallowed. Ban medicine, because despite the warnings children sometimes get into their parents medicine. Wonder how much money was spent on this worthless decision?

Jul 25, 2012 4:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bdc wrote:
The problem really isn’t buckyballs or the lack of warnings. The example of the 4 year old, yes, a 4 year old is not going to read the warnings. If there were warning labels at the time the mother of the child should be arrested for child abuse or negligence or something. We can’t make the world a padded white cell for the negligent parents among us. However, if we start locking up negligent parents maybe we’ll see some improvement.

Jul 25, 2012 4:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Hank_M wrote:
These ‘desk toys’ are indefensible hazards. First, their mode of killing is tricky and invisible, requiring two balls to clamp a loop of intestine. Second, they are designed to be interesting, an attractive nuisance for toddlers. Third, they do nothing useful for the human race, unlike other hazards such as electrical appliances or household cleansers. Fourth, all of us are paying for these childrens’ surgeries, whether through higher taxes or through higher insurance premiums.

Jul 25, 2012 5:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.