Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Penn State could have had four-year death penalty-school spokesman

Related Topics

Penn State University students, prospective students and their parents watch a live broadcast of the announcement of the NCAA penalties and sanctions at the HUB-Robeson Center on the Penn State campus in State College, PA July 23, 2012. REUTERS/Craig Houtz

Penn State University students, prospective students and their parents watch a live broadcast of the announcement of the NCAA penalties and sanctions at the HUB-Robeson Center on the Penn State campus in State College, PA July 23, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Craig Houtz

PHILADELPHIA | Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:34am EDT

PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - Penn State University accepted unprecedented NCAA penalties as punishment for a child sex abuse cover-up because they were better than the alternative: a four-year death sentence for its football program, according to school trustees.

The trustees said in a statement late Wednesday after a meeting with President Rodney Erickson that it found the "punitive sanctions difficult" and the process with the governing body of U.S. college sports "unfortunate."

"But as we understand it, the alternatives were worse as confirmed by NCAA President Mark Emmert's recent statement that Penn State was likely facing a multi-year death sentence," the Penn State Board of Trustees said in a statement released by school spokesman David La Torre.

La Torre confirmed that the punishment under discussion was a four-year death penalty, which would have prevented Penn State from playing any games. The current penalty bars it from post-season bowl games for four years, but allows regular season play.

The National Collegiate Athletic Association said it was punishing Penn State for its handling of child sex abuse reports against former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky.

In June, Sandusky was convicted of sexually abusing 10 boys over 15 years, sometimes at the Penn State facilities. He awaits sentencing and faces up to 373 years in prison.

The board said it discussed with Erickson the punishment he accepted for Penn State, which included a $60 million fine, a reduction in football scholarships, a four-year ban from lucrative post-season games and the voiding of the last 14 years of football victories.

This month, former FBI director Louis Freeh released a report that criticized the late legendary Penn State football coach Joe Paterno, who was Sandusky's boss, for protecting the serial pedophile and the school's image at the expense of young victims.

The NCAA's actions stripped Paterno of his record for victories in collegiate football. It also severely bruised the football team, whose star recruits have already begun looking at other schools.

But the death penalty would have devastated the football program, at the very least costing it at least $240 million in revenue for the four years the stadium would be shuttered. The $60 million fine levied by the NCAA was chosen, Emmert said, because it represented the program's annual gross revenue.

The only time the NCAA has used the death penalty was against South Methodist University in 1987, for improperly paying players. The NCAA banned SMU for the 1987 season, and the university opted not to play in 1988 rather than play an abbreviated season.

SMU has never fully recovered from the one-year ban. It was two decades before it reached post-season play again, and has managed just three winning seasons since returning to play in 1989.

Meanwhile on Thursday, the Freeh report was criticized as unfair and thinly researched by the organization Penn Staters for Responsible Stewardship, whose membership includes 7,500 alumni. The group posted online its own document aimed at refuting the points made by the Freeh report.

(Writing by Barbara Goldberg; Editing by Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Why are they hurting the students for what the coaches did? Now the second group of kids who asked for only the chance to grow and enjoy there lives is being torn apart by this evil waste of life (sandusky and the people who covered for him).The team doesn’t deserve to be hurt more because of this. Why go after the team, it wasn’t the players, it was the coaches! Another waste by penn state. Hate to adnit i’m from Pa. right now with how bad the players are being treated now.

Jul 26, 2012 4:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Why are they hurting the students for what the coaches did? Now the second group of kids who asked for only the chance to grow and enjoy there lives is being torn apart by this evil waste of life (sandusky and the people who covered for him).The team doesn’t deserve to be hurt more because of this. Why go after the team, it wasn’t the players, it was the coaches! Another waste by penn state. Hate to adnit i’m from Pa. right now with how bad the players are being treated now.

Jul 26, 2012 4:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.