Google urges end to authors' digital book lawsuit

Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:15pm EDT

A security personnel answers a call at the reception counter of the Google office in the southern Indian city of Hyderabad February 6, 2012. REUTERS/Krishnendu Halder

A security personnel answers a call at the reception counter of the Google office in the southern Indian city of Hyderabad February 6, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Krishnendu Halder

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Google Inc retook the offensive against thousands of authors claiming it copied their works without permission, and urged the end of a class-action lawsuit arising from its ambitious plan to build the world's largest digital book library.

Friday's request by the world's largest search engine company followed a federal judge's March 2011 rejection of a sweeping $125 million settlement of the now seven-year-old case. Talks to revive an accord later broke down.

Google has said it has scanned more than 20 million books, and posted English-language snippets of more than 4 million, since agreeing in 2004 with large research libraries to digitize current and out-of-print works for its Google Books website.

While Google planned to provide only snippets online to comply with copyright laws governing fair use, The Authors Guild and groups representing photographers and graphic artists complained that it amounted to "massive copyright infringement."

In a filing with the U.S. district court in Manhattan, Google said authors have shown no economic harm from its scanning and display of their works and the creation of a searchable index to find them.

The company also said authors actually benefit because the database helps people find and buy their books, and that there is a "significant public benefit" from providing access to information that might otherwise not be found.

"Google Books creates enormous transformative benefits without reducing the value of the authors' work," it said. "(It) therefore passes with ease the ultimate test of fair use."

Michael Boni, a lawyer for The Authors Guild, whose president is novelist-lawyer Scott Turow, said he asked the court on Friday to grant summary judgment in his client's favor.

He said his filing is not public because it refers to confidential Google documents. "We're grinding away," Boni said in an interview.

In rejecting the $125 million accord, Judge Denny Chin had said it went too far because it gave Google a "de facto monopoly" to copy books en masse without permission and served to "further entrench" its market power in online searches.

Among the libraries whose works have been scanned are those of Harvard University, Oxford University, Stanford University, the University of California, the University of Michigan, and the New York Public Library, Google has said.

The United States, Inc and Microsoft Corp had been among those to raise antitrust concerns about the settlement.

Chin began overseeing the Google case as a trial judge and kept jurisdiction after he was elevated in 2010 to the federal appeals court in New York.

He granted class-action status to authors in May, and said groups representing photographers and graphic artists may also sue. Individual plaintiffs in the case include former New York Yankees baseball pitcher Jim Bouton, the author of "Ball Four."

Google shares closed on Friday up $21.60, or 3.5 percent, at $634.96 on the Nasdaq, as U.S. stocks advanced broadly.

The case is The Authors Guild et al v. Google Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 05-08136.

(Reporting By Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Steve Orlofsky, Toni Reinhold)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
Overcast451 wrote:
So… libraries don’t hurt, but the same text being online does hurt the authors?

I daresay if not for ‘free books’ at libraries, most authors may well never be discovered to even sell their books.

Jul 27, 2012 8:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
BBJJ wrote:
Google, the evil company, is profiting through advertising by making unauthorized copies of books. Each time someone uses Google to search for a book, Google makes money off the backs of authors and publishers.

Libraries lend books one at a time for each copy they purchased to members. They don’t distribute unrestricted numbers of copies to anyone who asks.

Jul 28, 2012 9:09am EDT  --  Report as abuse
DifferentOne wrote:
Why does Google charge for advertising, yet they want exploit the work of hard-working authors and publishers without payment? This is a double standard. If Google should get paid, why shouldn’t authors and publishers also get paid?

Google seems to believe that theft and hypocrisy are okay, as long as their profits keep growing.

Jul 28, 2012 9:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.