Israel's Barak plays down Syrian chemical arms risk

JERUSALEM Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:57am EDT

Related Topics

Photo

Air strikes in Gaza

Our latest photos from the scene.   Slideshow 

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel played down on Monday the risk from Syria's chemical weapons, in what appeared to be a new tack after threats to take military action to prevent the arsenal falling into Islamist hands.

Israel has been particularly worried that Hezbollah, the Iranian-inspired Shiite militia in neighboring Lebanon, may gain access to the weapons should Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's grip slip amid a 16-month-old insurgency.

Israel's warnings on this spread war fears and bumped up demand for government-issued gas masks.

But since Syria last week acknowledged for the first time that it had chemical weapons, saying they were secure and would be used only as a last resort against "external aggression", the Israelis have been voicing cautious confidence.

"Nothing will happen," Defence Minister Ehud Barak told Israel Radio in an interview, joking that he would return his gas mask.

"In my opinion, no one in the world would dare to use chemical weapons against Israel. So nothing is going to happen."

Israel is believed to have the only nuclear arsenal in the region - something it has never acknowledged - giving it the ability to deter or retaliate against any non-conventional attack.

Hezbollah, a longtime Assad ally, has not commented on the speculation that it might want Syria's chemical weapons.

Israel and Hezbollah fought an inconclusive 2006 border war. Barak has since said that in any new conflict Israel would consider the whole of Lebanon fair game, given the militia's role in Beirut politics.

Some Israeli officials have also worried that radical Sunni Islamists among rebels fighting Assad may try to seize Syria's chemical weapons. Another suggested scenario is that Assad could use them against Israel in a suicidal last stand meant to secure his legacy in the Arab world.

Israel is technically at war with Syria and occupies the Golan Heights that it seized in the 1967 war and later annexed.

But the countries have not directly exchanged fire in three decades, and a parliamentary briefing last week by the Israeli armed forces chief about the risk of "uncontrollable deterioration" in Syria were interpreted by local media as a caution against opening a new fighting front with Assad.

"As long as the situation in Syria is still within Assad's control, Israel has no reason to worry," Eitan Haber, former spokesman for the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, wrote in the biggest-selling Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth.

"As long as they are in charge, the assumption is they will not use this doomsday weapon - with an emphasis on 'as long'."

(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Myra MacDonald)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Vison8 wrote:
Obama and Hillary Clinton has played into the hands of al-quaeda and jihadists in the Mid East: whilst fighting al-quaeda in Afganistan, this pair, in their haste for ‘regime changes’, have been financing, arming and providing favorable media support to the same jihadis, who have come into power for the first time in the world: Egypt, Libya and soon in Syria.

Israel is preparing to send 30,000 troops to Syria to prevent chemical weapons falling into the hands of al-quaeda (only one media outlet reported this, and it was deleted within hours from the internet).

Soon, we’ll be sending shiploads of our troops and spend trillions of our tax money fighting the same jihadi hooligans that we are helping, now.

Do we need four more years of this bufoonery in the USA???????

Jul 30, 2012 10:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
matthewslyman wrote:
@V8:
“Israel is preparing to send 30,000 troops to Syria to prevent chemical weapons falling into the hands of al-quaeda”

Assad must still have 100k-150k troops under his command. If Israel sent their army into Syria, they would be the common enemy of both sides in this civil war. That would do nothing good for Isreal’s security. Why would they do that?

Sorry but your paranoia makes no sense. I think we should be less worried about chemical weapons, and more worried about the humanitarian dimension to this conflict and others like it. The only way peace will ever come to the middle east, or anywhere else; is if governmental transparency and social justice come first, displacing corruption and patronage.

Jul 30, 2012 3:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.