Senate panel passes bill to block EU airline law

WASHINGTON Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:51pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Senate committee passed a bill on Tuesday authorizing the transportation secretary to bar U.S. airlines from complying with a European Union law that would require them to pay for carbon emissions on flights to and from Europe.

The measure approved by the Senate Commerce Committee will be sent to the full Senate for a vote.

The 19-member panel voted to approve an updated version of a bipartisan bill authored by Republican Senator John Thune and Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill.

Thune called on the Senate to pass the bill immediately to apply more pressure on the EU to stand down from what he called a misguided and unlawful tax.

"More than $3.1 billion will be wrapped up in new taxes between 2012 and 2020 that could otherwise be invested in creating jobs and stimulating economic growth in our country," Thune said.

Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer, a long-time advocate of mandatory curbs on carbon emissions and author of several cap-and-trade bills, said she and fellow Democratic Senator John Kerry would back the measure after Thune included compromise language.

The Thune-McCaskill bill directs the secretary of transportation to prohibit U.S. airlines from participating in the EU trading scheme to curb carbon emissions if he or she deems it in the public interest.

Thune added compromise language that would require the secretary to hold a public hearing before implementing any ban. It would also require the secretary and other relevant transportation officials to conduct international negotiations "to pursue a worldwide approach" to address aircraft emissions.

"Initially I wasn't going to support the Thune-McCaskill bill," Boxer told the committee, noting that she and Kerry changed their minds after negotiating the text with the Republican senator.

"It (the bill) makes it clear that the place for dealing with this whole issue is an international organization that is already set up," referring to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), she said.

The U.S. Department of Transportation and State Department are hosting talks on Tuesday and Wednesday with 16 other countries that oppose the EU's trading scheme to find a global alternative under ICAO.

Kerry, who also announced his support for the bill, warned if ICAO does not come up with an alternative solution soon "we are headed for a trade war."

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson of Texas, the top Republican on the committee, said the EU trading scheme represents the "unilateral taxation of U.S. companies and citizens."

She said the bill is a "consensus plan that takes into account economic realities."

Annie Petsonk, international counsel at the Environmental Defense Fund, said although the bill made some compromises and encouraged international cooperation, the work of ICAO has been too slow.

"We've been in hot pursuit of this (an ICAO framework) for 15 years, so what makes the Senate think this is any different?"

(Reporting By Valerie Volcovici; Editing by Kenneth Barry)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Abulafiah wrote:
The USA copying China? Well done – that makes the USA look like a world leader. China’s mistake was thinking that anyone outside China was interested in laws that have no power outside China. America’s mistake is in copying China’s mistake.

The USA, China, Russia, etc are saying “this should be dealt with by the ICAO”, but the ICAO has been trying for 14 years to get agreement, and the USA, China, Russia, etc refuse to agree to anything. Now they complain at the EU, but still offer no constructive alternative.

The question then arises of what the complainers are going to do about it. The scheme is completely legal under international law, so If they won’t pay the tax they don’t land in Europe. It is as simple as that.

Left to a free market, no airline is going to give up on European flights because they would go out of business. They would jus absorb the cost or charge the extra $2-3 and keep the route open. That is why China, a communist country comfortable with the rulers telling businesses how to conduct their business, has passed a law telling airlines that they will have to stop flying to Europe even if it kills their business.

The USA following suit? Think about what that says about the USA.

Aug 01, 2012 8:53am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus