Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Senate panel approves defense bill with biofuels funds

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:48pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Senate subcommittee approved legislation on Tuesday that continues funding for the Pentagon's use of biofuels, a senator said, in a move pushing back against critics trying to limit outlays on programs such as the Navy's "Great Green Fleet."

Some biofuels funding was included in a $604 billion defense spending bill for fiscal 2013 passed by the Senate's defense appropriations subcommittee, the panel's chairman, Democratic Senator Daniel Inouye, told reporters.

"I think we do have funding for that," Inouye said. He did not give the amount, and committee aides said they could not provide details before Thursday, when the defense spending bill goes to the full appropriations committee for a vote.

A committee summary of the defense bill said it included increases in the area of alternative energy but gave no details.

Critics say that at a time when the U.S. military faces significant cuts, there is no room for Pentagon spending on testing expensive biofuels even if -- as the Obama administration says -- the goal is to curb reliance on foreign oil.

In the recent "Green Fleet" exercise, a group of U.S. warships and fighter jets burned an expensive blend of biofuels and petroleum. The Navy paid over $26 per gallon for biofuel made from renewable sources like algae and chicken fat.

In May, Republican critics of the biofuels plan pushed two proposals to limit military spending on biofuels through the Senate Armed Services Committee. House Republicans have also moved to curb the funding.

But Tuesday's vote by the defense appropriations subcommittee shows the biofuels critics may not have the last word in Congress. Biofuels supporters already have said they hope to alter the Armed Services committee's changes in action on the floor of the Democrat-majority Senate.

The defense appropriations legislation for fiscal 2013 that was approved by the committee also restored some other military programs that the Obama administration sought to cut. But it still came in $29 billion less than current defense spending, primarily due to the drawdown of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

The legislation provides $511 billion for the Pentagon's "base" budget and another $93.3 billion for the war in Afghanistan for the fiscal year that begins on October 1.

It would restore $800 million that the administration had sought to cut from the U.S. Air Force. The appropriations subcommittee also reversed the Navy's proposal to prematurely retire seven cruisers and two amphibious ships, the committee summary of the legislation said.

Senator Richard Shelby, a Republican on the subcommittee, said the bill included money for the final year of development work on a joint ground-based missile defense program with Italy and Germany.

"This would enable us to meet our obligations with our European allies," Shelby said but did not reveal the amount.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta had urged lawmakers to include $400.9 million for the program, known as the Medium Extended Air and Missile Defense System (MEADS) built by Lockheed Martin Corp and its partners in Italy and Germany.

(Reporting By Susan Cornwell; Editing by Kenneth Barry)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
USARealist wrote:
Biofuels are dumb for the most part. They cause environmental destruction by habitat loss for endangered species (Palm oil). They drive up food prices (ethanol). The ones that half-way work are ridiculously expensive. We need to focus on burning coal and nat gas cleaner (we have plenty of both and we’re making great progress). I want to lessen our dependence on foreign oil also, but I want to do it intelligently. Unfortunatetly the non-thinking emotional response by environmentalists leads us to try every non-oil option, no matter how stupid.

Jul 31, 2012 5:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.