Ecuador wants to avoid Assange's extradition to Sweden

QUITO Wed Aug 1, 2012 7:05pm EDT

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa (R) talks to Christine Assange (L), mother of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, during a meeting at Carondelet Palace in Quito August 1, 2012. REUTERS/Kevin Granja

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa (R) talks to Christine Assange (L), mother of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, during a meeting at Carondelet Palace in Quito August 1, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Granja

Related Topics

QUITO (Reuters) - Ecuador wants to prevent Julian Assange's extradition to Sweden because it is disappointed that the Scandinavian country has turned down an offer to question the WikiLeaks founder in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, a minister said on Wednesday.

Assange has been holed up in Ecuador's Embassy in London for six weeks as he awaits a decision on his asylum request by the leftist government of Rafael Correa.

The Australian anti-secrecy campaigner, who angered Washington in 2010 when his WikiLeaks website published secret U.S. diplomatic cables, is wanted for questioning in Sweden over sex crime allegations. He fears that if he is sent to Sweden he could be bundled off to the United States.

Ecuador has long said that it will take as long as needed to make a thorough analysis of Assange's asylum request before making a decision. Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino on Monday vowed to wait until the end of the London Olympic Games on August 12 to announce a decision.

He said Ecuador had invited Swedish authorities to question Assange in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, which could give the former computer hacker a chance to avoid extradition to Sweden.

But following a meeting with Correa on Wednesday Patino said he had "unofficially" learned that Sweden had turned down the offer. He said he was disappointed about Sweden's decision because it "makes the situation more complicated."

"This makes it more difficult for us to make a decision that would mean that Mr. Assange would have to travel to Sweden," Patino told reporters outside the presidential palace.

Patino did not say if Ecuador is now more inclined to grant political asylum to Assange, but said his country's decision will seek to protect Assange's life and his right to freedom.

"This will be a factor to consider in the decision we have to make. Had we had a positive answer from the Swedish government then we would be considering taking a different kind of decision," Patino said.

Sweden's foreign ministry declined to comment, but a Swedish prosecution authority spokesman said prosecutor Marianne Nyh had turned down an offer to interrogate Assange in Ecuador's Embassy in London.

The spokesman said the offer was made by Assange's Swedish lawyer Per Samuelsson, but that the prosecution authority had not been in contact with Ecuadorean officials. He said he was unaware if there had been any contacts at government level.

NO CHARGES

According to Julian Assange's mother, Christina Assange, who is in Ecuador to plead for her son's asylum request, the United States is bent on having the 41-year-old extradited, and that would only be possible if he is sent to Sweden first.

She fears that her son will face torture and even execution if deported to the United States.

"I'm here humbly as a mother to present some facts. Of course I'll be most grateful if asylum is granted to my son to save him from being hooked by the US government," she told reporters after a meeting with Correa on Wednesday.

Neither U.S. nor Swedish authorities have charged Assange with anything. Swedish prosecutors want to question him about allegations of rape and sexual assault made by two WikiLeaks supporters in 2010.

Assange, whose distinctive platinum hair and high-flying friends have made him a global celebrity, says he had consensual sex with the women.

"Even though there isn't a trial, there aren't judicial proceedings against him, Sweden wants to imprison him ... That's why we asked the Swedish government to question him where he's now," Patino said as he expressed disbelief that Sweden had turned down the offer.

(Reporting by Jose Llangari; Additional reporting by Anna Ringstrom in Stockholm; Editing by Cynthia Osterman and Stacey Joyce)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
johnnyt74 wrote:
I would like to see how those jerks plan to get Assange from the embassy in London to Ecuador.

Aug 01, 2012 7:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
me2olive wrote:
I can’t see what argument the Swedish prosecutor could really make for not questioning Assange at the embassy. If they did not get the details they wanted, they could simply state as much, and continue the extradition process. This is starting to look very suspicious indeed, they clearly want him in Swedish custody for a lot more than just to answer a few questions.

I really have to say well done to Patino and the Ecuadorean Embassy for sticking to their guns here and following the proper procedure. I’m sure the US will be leaning on them to turn Assange over, but from the sounds of things they aren’t folding. I only wish the British government had shown more backbone, but can’t say I’m all that surprised.

I still can’t fathom how the extradition was even approved given the conflicting evidence. Not to mention the fact that this particular kind of extradition is only supposed to go ahead when the two legal systems are considered equivalent and compatible, even though in this case what one country sees as a form of ‘rape’ the other would only see (at most) as minor assault. Like I’ve said, very suspicious indeed.

Aug 02, 2012 6:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
willie48 wrote:
Assange is wanted in Sweden for questioning as a result of date – rape allagations by two female Wikileaks supporters. “Wikileaks supporters” ? really ? How can a person be a supporter of such a profoundly vital instrument that delivers actual news in a world of professional perfidy, act to destroy it for the sake of their sexual honor ? If they were actually supporters, they would gladly expend their honor, their wealth , and there lives in order to persue the Cause. Sounds like a set up. Real women want to have Assanges’s child, not his head.

Aug 02, 2012 4:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.