Fukushima residents say resounding "no" to nuclear energy

FUKUSHIMA, Japan Wed Aug 1, 2012 8:21am EDT

An anti-nuclear protester holds a flag reading: ''No Nukes'' during a demonstration in Tokyo July 29, 2012. REUTERS/Yuriko Nakao

An anti-nuclear protester holds a flag reading: ''No Nukes'' during a demonstration in Tokyo July 29, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Yuriko Nakao

FUKUSHIMA, Japan (Reuters) - Get out of nuclear power and do it fast, angry Fukushima residents told Japanese government officials on Wednesday at a public hearing on energy policy held in an area ravaged by a nuclear disaster that has whipped up opposition to atomic power.

The Fukushima hearing, the ninth out of 11 planned nationwide, sought to gather views on nuclear power's role in the nation's energy mix as the government struggles to cover a power shortfall by that could threaten economic growth.

Meltdowns at Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s Fukushima nuclear plant after an earthquake and tsunami on March 11 last year caused radiation to spew over large areas of Fukushima, forcing more than 160,0000 people to flee. In the following months, all of Japan's nuclear plants were shut for safety checks. Two reactors resumed operations last month.

"I want all the reactors in Japan shut immediately and scrapped," a grey-haired woman, who introduced herself as a farmer living 65 km (40 miles) from the Fukushima plant, said at the public hearing in the prefecture capital.

"Many people are now aware that the government's talking of 'no immediate risk to health' is tantamount to 'long-term health risk'," she said to the applause of about 200 residents packed in a small concert hall.

Goshi Hosono, minister in charge of the response to the nuclear crisis, was heckled as he apologized for the suffering of people in Fukushima.

"I will never forget what I heard today, and I'm determined to do everything I can," he said.

Fukushima prosecutors on Wednesday launched an investigation after more than 1,000 residents filed criminal complaints against 15 former and present Tokyo Electric Power officials, including former company president Masataka Shimizu, and 18 government officials, including Nuclear Safety Commission head Haruki Madarame, a lawyer for the group, Hiroyuki Kawai, told Reuters.

Kawai said Tokyo prosecutors had launched a separate investigation.

A panel of experts appointed by parliament concluded last month that the disaster could have been prevented and that failure to take precautions was the result of "collusion" among the utility, regulators and the government.

"After reading the report by the parliament-appointed panel, prosecutors could not stand idly by," Kawai said.

THREE OPTIONS

Japan met about a third of its energy needs with nuclear power before the disaster and had plans to boost that share to more than half, in part, to combat global warming.

Now, three options that the government has put on the table are to phase out nuclear power completely as soon as possible, aim for a 15 percent share of the power supply by 2030, or a 20-25 percent share by the same date.

Residents of Fukushima, 240 km (150 miles) north of Tokyo, overwhelmingly backed the zero option, with all but one of the 30 who were picked in a draw to speak backing a swift exit.

The Asahi newspaper reported this week that elsewhere 70 percent of those taking part in the hearings opted for the nuclear-free scenario. It is not clear how the hearings will affect the final energy plan that could come as soon as this month.

But commentators said it would be hard for the government to ignore the findings as 17 months after the world's worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl, many still live in fear and thousands hired to dismantle the Fukushima plant face decades of grueling and dangerous work.

Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda's decision to restart two reactors in Japan's western manufacturing hub to avoid blackouts galvanized the anti-nuclear movement.

More than 100,000 people attended an anti-nuclear rally last month and protests staged weekly outside of Noda's residence have grown, with ordinary workers and mothers with children joining the crowds.

"I'm scared. I'm really scared," said a middle-aged woman, addressing the hearing.

"I'd like the government to think about why people have gathered in front of the prime minister's residence every Friday since April. That's not fashion. That's not a temporary fever. That's a heartfelt scream from the public."

(Additional reporting by Linda Sieg in Tokyo; Writing by Tomasz Janowski; Editing by Ed Lane)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
jimwg wrote:
Be careful what you wish for when you’re dumping reactors in favor of fossil fuels, Japan. You’d be putting the health of millions at immediate and continuous peril because you think you’re ridding yourselves of a bogeyman heath risk. For Pete’s sake, protesters are acting as though the reactors actually KILLED someone! Has anyone gone after the oil explosions in Tokyo that killed a dozen people from the same quake? These protesters seem terribly disillusioned when the Doomsday nightmares of a meltdown didn’t live up to the hype in spades. Now their frightful zeal wants to replace reactors that never polluted or injured anyone with gas and oil which historically have — plus are fossil fuels that cause respiratory aliments in the millions and contribute to the Greenhouse effect — which we hardly hear much about from the media now. Why? Is because the cleanest and most reliable way to generate the most electricity pound per pound is nuclear energy? Nuclear energy isn’t evil, no more than fire is. It’s undeniable public health record is envied in every industry. Not as “what ifs” but in reality; Less people have been killed by nuclear power worldwide over 60 years — including accidents — than in a single 707 crash. That’s not opinion or denial or PR, but that’s the hard fact record, like the no-axe-to-grind WHO-documented non-hazard of Fukushima radiation exposure! Don’t let irrational fear vote for your children to suffer far more from lung and pollution aliments from fossil fuels than they ever will by radiation, Japan. They already have for generations around the world.

James Greenidge
c/o AtomicInsights.com

Aug 04, 2012 7:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.