Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

NATO should finish job in Afghanistan, Putin says

Russian President Vladimir Putin (2nd L) visits the base of the independent airborne assault brigade number 31, on the eve of the Paratroopers' Day, in the city of Ulyanovsk on the Volga River August 1, 2012. REUTERS/Alexei Nikolskyi/RIA Novosti/Pool

Russian President Vladimir Putin (2nd L) visits the base of the independent airborne assault brigade number 31, on the eve of the Paratroopers' Day, in the city of Ulyanovsk on the Volga River August 1, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Alexei Nikolskyi/RIA Novosti/Pool

ULYANOVSK, Russia | Wed Aug 1, 2012 3:16pm EDT

ULYANOVSK, Russia (Reuters) - NATO forces should stay in Afghanistan until they have finished their job to ensure stability, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday, criticizing the planned withdrawal of most combat troops by 2014.

Putin reiterated Kremlin concerns that the pull-out of the U.S.-led alliance, due to start next year, will leave the Central Asian region south of Russia vulnerable to militant violence and drug trafficking.

"It is regrettable that many participants in this operation are thinking about how to pull out of there. They took up this burden and should carry it to the end," Putin said at a meeting with paratroopers in the Russian city of Ulyanovsk.

"If there is no order in Afghanistan it will not be calm on our southern borders. The current (Afghan) leadership will have difficulties keeping the situation under control. NATO member states are present there, and are performing this function," he said.

"We need to help them (NATO). We should not be fighting there again. Let them sit there and fight."

The Soviet Union fought a disastrous war in Afghanistan in the 1980s and Russia ruled out sending troops to aid the U.S.-led invasion after the September 11, 2001 attacks.

But Moscow has supported the NATO operation by allowing transit across its territory.

It expanded that support with an agreement that took effect on Wednesday allowing the alliance to use a transit hub in Ulyanovsk to send non-lethal supplies in and out of Afghanistan using the Russian rail network and air transport.

Supply routes are particularly important for the NATO operation in Afghanistan and the planned pull-out.

Removing a major headache for the alliance, Pakistan re-opened NATO transit lines via its territory in July after months of closure over NATO air strike that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.

Putin said the transit hub agreement, which has drawn criticism from Communists and others saying Russia is allowing an enemy on its territory, in fact benefited Russia - which is otherwise often at loggerheads with the alliance.

"It corresponds to our national interests. On many other issues we have disagreements. We have different approaches, opinions." Putin said, reiterating his description of NATO as a "throwback to the past, to the times of the Cold War".

"We will cooperate with them on other fields, fighting piracy on the sea, international terrorism, organized crime. But we will always follow our national interests," the former KGB spy said.

(Writing by Gabriela Baczynska; Editing by Steve Gutterman and Pravin Char)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
mils54 wrote:
Russia should be invited to join Nato!, Maybe then they will become more relaxed in the dealings with the U.S….They also should have been taking part of this Aghanistan war against terror (what a bunch of bull!)from the start, enough with this mistrust garbage, We should both openly admit it’s all about MONEY somewhere along the line and work together to fill the coffers, maybe then some of it will slide down to us sheep!….Baaaaaaaaaa!.

Aug 01, 2012 12:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
W-DS wrote:
This is him having a dig at us for running like we had a dig at Russia for running/cutting its losses.

Nothing more, nothing less.

Worst part? Hes correct/cant be ridiculed for saying it, well hinting at it. Why? We didnt achieve anymore than they did.

Aug 01, 2012 5:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PenRumi wrote:
It is a positive step for Russian leader Putin to recognize the ramifications of the withdrawal of NATO troops in 2014 and to state the obvious that the Central Asian region south of Russia will be “vulnerable to militant violence and drug trafficking”.

If the Karzai government collapses after 2014, the only political alternative to fallen dictatorial regimes in Muslim countries is the Islamists as proven in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, and now Syria (with al-Qaeda effectively taking over the resistance against the Bashar Assad regime). Therefore, it is imperative to build a viable opposition in Afghanistan consisting of moderates because the Islamists in Afghanistan are the ghastly Taliban. The Taliban are similar to the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia in 1970s when it comes to personnel, social engineering policies, and cruelty – a comparison no one likes to make.

Both Russia and China should replace the bulk of NATO troops in Afghanistan before 2014 because of the geographical proximity of these nations to the conflict.

Aug 01, 2012 5:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.