House to vote on Russia trade bill if Democrats support it: Cantor

WASHINGTON Thu Aug 2, 2012 7:16pm EDT

Eric Cantor (L) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, December 22, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Eric Cantor (L) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, December 22, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said on Thursday that the House of Representatives will take up a bill to normalize trade relations with Russia this fall, if the Democratic-majority Senate and President Barack Obama "commit to support" passage before the end of September.

The White House has called normalizing trade relations with Russia its top legislative trade priority this year. Republicans have complained that Obama has not done enough to whip up Democratic support for the effort.

Business groups hoped Congress would pass the legislation before Russia enters the World Trade Organization on August 22, otherwise, they said, there is a risk that U.S. businesses and farmers will not share in all the market-opening concessions Russia made to join the world trade body.

But U.S. lawmakers are not expected to conduct any major legislative business in Washington during the rest of August.

Cantor said that when the House considers the Russia trade bill, it will include human rights provisions known as the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act. Cantor also said the House would take up the measure under "suspension of the rules," meaning lawmakers could not amend it on the House floor.

"Upon our return from the August constituent work period, the House is prepared to take up under suspension of the rules a bill to extend Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) to Russia, combined with the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act, should the Senate and President commit to support passage before the end of September," Cantor's one-sentence statement said.

The Russia trade bill would repeal a mostly symbolic Cold-War era restriction on trade between the two countries known as the Jackson-Vanik amendment, which was passed in 1974 to pressure the former Soviet Union to allow Jews to emigrate.

But the effort to normalize trade ties has been stymied by the perception that doing so would help Russia at a time when many lawmakers are frustrated by Moscow's support for Syria and Iran and question its commitment to democracy, human rights and the rule of law.

Advocates of the Magnitsky bill want that legislation included in the Russia trade bill so it can replace the Jackson-Vanik amendment as part of U.S. law on trade with Russia.

The Magnitsky legislation is named for an anti-corruption Russian lawyer who died in 2009 after a year in Russian jails. It calls for the United States to ban visas and freeze the assets of people believed responsible for Magnitsky's death, and would penalize other human rights abusers in Russia.

(Reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by Anthony Boadle and Stacey Joyce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
hakny wrote:
I am amazed at how these Congressmen (and women) can get legislative work accomplished when their own behinds are on the line. 8,000,000 workers made jobless starting four years ago and after hiding out pretending nothing happened they finally lift their heads out of the sand for air.

Lets hope the American people see the light and send these buzzards home, every last one of them, to places where the picking are really slim. They all deserve it.

Aug 02, 2012 7:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tom1934 wrote:
Rep. Cantor: Will the Russia Trade Bill apply import fees on them as required to balance our payments from trade with them?

Aug 02, 2012 7:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.