Romney says more Fed stimulus would not help US economy

WASHINGTON Sun Aug 5, 2012 12:54pm EDT

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney talks to two women after a campaign event in Golden, Colorado August 2, 2012. REUTERS/Rick Wilking

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney talks to two women after a campaign event in Golden, Colorado August 2, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Rick Wilking

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said on Sunday that a fresh round of monetary stimulus from the Federal Reserve would not help the fragile U.S. economy.

A stream of disappointing economic reports has underpinned expectations that the U.S. central bank will do more to stimulate growth with a third round of billions of dollars of bond purchases, also known as quantitative easing, or QE3.

"I am sure the Fed is watching, will try to encourage the economy, but I don't think a massive new QE3 is going to help this economy," Romney said in an interview with CNN's "State of the Union" television program aired on Sunday.

"The Fed's first action, quantitative easing, was effective to a certain degree. But I believe that the QE2, the second round of easing, I don't think it had the impact that they were hoping for," he said.

Romney, who has been stressing his business acumen and years as Massachusetts governor as experiences he would employ to help heal the economy, has vowed to create 12 million jobs in his first four years as president were he to beat Democratic President Barack Obama in the November election.

The unemployment rate ticked up to 8.3 percent in July, the government's latest jobs data showed last week, prompting Romney to tear into Obama's handling of the economy, a key election issue.

On Wednesday, the Fed signaled that more bond buying could be on the way if the recovery does not pick up - a move that could unleash fresh attacks on the central bank.

Many prominent members of the Republican party have strongly opposed the Fed's unconventional policy measures to sustain the recovery from the 2007-2009 economic crisis, accusing the central bank of going beyond its mandate and saying that new monetary stimulus could fuel inflation.

Foreign governments have also attacked the Fed's previous two stimulus programs, saying they artificially weakened the U.S. dollar and hurt their exports.

In addition to pumping more money into the economy, the Fed has tried to push down longterm borrowing costs with its "Operation Twist" program of replacing short-term debt it holds with longer-term securities.

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said on Sunday it was up to the Fed to decide whether the economy needed more stimulus, not Romney or the White House.

"The Federal Reserve is an independent financial institution," she said on ABC's "This Week" television program.

"It's important that we not dictate from the White House, or certainly from candidates for president of the United States, what the Federal Reserve should be doing," she said.

(Editing by Vicki Allen and Philip Barbara)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
minipaws wrote:
So what! What can Romney do about it. Nothing. I’m voting Libertarian because both parties have screwed up our country royally. Time for a real change. Time for a party that want’s to eliminate the Fed!

Aug 05, 2012 11:15am EDT  --  Report as abuse
USA4 wrote:
‘Stimulus’ should be the government making it easier and more profitable for private sector businesses to grow and hire people- not spending other people’s money as politicians seeking reelection see fit. The amount of money wasted through the Obama administration’s short sighted attempts at stimulating the economy is appalling. Maybe his presidential legacy will be the repaving of America. But every time I drive over a road that has been needlessly repaved (which happens regularly), I am disgusted by the waste and poor spending decisions of this administration.

Aug 05, 2012 12:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
sjtom wrote:
Obama never even attempted to “stimulate the economy”. He was merely paying back those who gave large donations to his campaign. Of the two major parties that’s all any of them have done for many years now.

Aug 05, 2012 12:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.