Sponsored Links

Soft-spoken Yellen wields outsize influence as Fed's No. 2

Janet L. Yellen, then president and chief operating officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, answers a reporter's question at the Town Hall Los Angeles forum in Los Angeles, in this March 23, 2010 file photo. If the Federal Reserve delivers another jolt of monetary stimulus to try to stir the U.S. economy back to life, it will be in part because of the powers of persuasion of a soft-spoken, former Berkeley professor. From her corner office just down the hall from Chairman Ben Bernanke's, Janet Yellen is one of the most influential economic policymakers in the world, backing bold action by the U.S. central bank at a time when much of Washington treats ''stimulus'' as a dirty word. Picture taken March 23, 2010. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni/Files

Janet L. Yellen, then president and chief operating officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, answers a reporter's question at the Town Hall Los Angeles forum in Los Angeles, in this March 23, 2010 file photo. If the Federal Reserve delivers another jolt of monetary stimulus to try to stir the U.S. economy back to life, it will be in part because of the powers of persuasion of a soft-spoken, former Berkeley professor. From her corner office just down the hall from Chairman Ben Bernanke's, Janet Yellen is one of the most influential economic policymakers in the world, backing bold action by the U.S. central bank at a time when much of Washington treats ''stimulus'' as a dirty word. Picture taken March 23, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mario Anzuoni/Files

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Sun Aug 5, 2012 10:01am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - If the Federal Reserve delivers another jolt of monetary stimulus to try to stir the U.S. economy back to life, it will be in part because of the powers of persuasion of a soft-spoken, former Berkeley professor.

From her corner office just down the hall from Chairman Ben Bernanke's, Janet Yellen is one of the most influential economic policymakers in the world, backing bold action by the U.S. central bank at a time when much of Washington treats "stimulus" as a dirty word.

With Congress and the White House locked in an election-year stand-off over spending and taxes, the Fed looks to be the only institution willing or able to stop the weak recovery from faltering yet again.

Power at the Fed is concentrated in a few hands - chief among them Bernanke and his No. 2 Yellen - even if the bank strives for consensus among its broader group of top officials.

That distillation of power makes Yellen hugely influential on policies that impact the world's largest economy and the rest of the globe.

"Her influence at the Fed has increased steadily," said Alfred Broaddus, a former president of the Richmond Federal Reserve who served with Yellen when she joined the Fed almost 20 years ago and often disagreed with her.

"I think she is now, along with the chairman and one or two others, one of the most influential people in the system," added Broaddus.

'DREAM COME TRUE'

Some observers think Yellen would be an obvious pick to run the Fed, if President Barack Obama wins re-election in November and if Bernanke has had enough of being chairman after his term expires in January 2014. She turns 66 on August 13.

Obama chose Yellen for the central bank's No. 2 position in 2010, drawing on both her academic credentials and previous experience working in a Democratic administration.

The child of Brooklyn doctor who saw patients in the family home, Yellen earned top honors at Brown University before opting to pursue a career in economics after hearing Yale University economist James Tobin speak.

Tobin, a Nobel prize-winning economist and an economic adviser to President John F. Kennedy, was heavily influenced by John Maynard Keynes, who argued governments can avert deep economic contractions like the Great Depression of the 1930s by increasing public spending.

Yellen was energized by Tobin's combination of theoretical accomplishment with public service.

"There was something about his strong sense of morality and social responsibility that greatly impressed me," she said in an interview with Reuters in July. Her meticulousness is legendary. Her notes of Tobin's lectures were so complete that students circulated copies of them as study guides.

In 1994, while teaching at the University of California at Berkeley, President Bill Clinton's White House asked her to serve on the Fed Board of Governors.

"I had thought about that from the time I had gone into economics, so that was like a dream come true to me," she said.

One of then-chairman Alan Greenspan's early assignments for Yellen was to argue against explicit inflation targets in a mock debate with Broaddus, a noted anti-inflation hawk.

Ironically, given her role-playing in the debate, Yellen turned out to be an early supporter of inflation-targeting in the face of opposition from Greenspan.

Almost 20 years on from that exploratory discussion, the Fed this year announced its own inflation target of 2 percent a year, after a long campaign by Bernanke.

"I'm just opposed to a pure inflation-only mandate in which the only thing a central bank cares about is inflation and not employment," Yellen says now. "I've never been opposed to having a numerical objective. I don't think the committee can operate intelligently unless people can agree on what we're trying to accomplish."

NOT ONE TO WING IT

Yellen is a stickler for preparation, writing out in detail the comments she delivers to Fed meetings rather than talk based on her notes as some of her peers do.

"She's not somebody who wings it," said someone who has worked with her and who spoke on condition of anonymity.

"She doesn't win the argument by tearing apart what people say. She wins by putting on the table such a carefully constructed set of arguments that other people subscribe to those."

In June, she launched a push for serious consideration of more monetary stimulus, citing the weak U.S. labor market and the dangers of contagion from the euro zone's debt crisis.

Her words to the Boston Economic Club left financial markets and many observers with a clear sense more help was on the way for the economy, a view that only grew this week when the Fed signaled it was edging closer to a possible third round of bond-buying.

Yellen has previously played the role of Fed communicator.

In the fall of 2010, a second round of bond purchases drew howls of protest at home and abroad. Critics said it raised inflation risks and unleashed wild flows of money into developing countries.

Yellen used a speech in January 2011 to rebut the criticisms one by one: the U.S. unemployment rates was due to slow demand, not a skills mismatch as many other economists argued; there was no risk of new asset bubbles forming; flows of capital into other countries could be beneficial; and, finally, what was good for the U.S. economy was good for the world.

"She's taken communication to a new level," said the former associate. "Those speeches she gave, they were dense, they were excellent analyses ... of the way the Fed's looking at the economy."

ENOUGH PROBLEMS ALREADY

Yellen's rise at the Fed comes at a contentious time for the central bank. Three years after the recession was officially declared over, the jobless rate remains above 8 percent, the depressed housing market is only beginning to show signs of recovery, and consumers are reining in spending. Detractors on both sides of the aisle in Congress and elsewhere argue that the Fed either is spinning its wheels or attempting too much.

While she brings her own perspective to the policy-making table, Yellen strives for consensus within the Fed's ranks.

"Certainly an important part of what I try to do in my role on the committee is take my personal point of view and try to explain it as clearly as I possibly can and advocate for it," she said. "But it's not just 100 percent that. I do absolutely understand that the committee needs to make a decision and we need to find something to do that can command sufficient support."

Nonetheless, she is an unabashed defender of Fed activism in order to meet the employment part of its dual mandate, along with keeping inflation low and stable.

"I absolutely feel that monetary policy has an impact on employment and output, and not only on inflation," she said.

Yellen is challenged regularly by her foils at the central bank. Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser questions whether further bond-buying would work and warns that reliance on unconventional policies could hurt the Fed's credibility.

Jeffrey Lacker, who took over the Richmond Fed from Boaddus, doubts the Fed can lower the jobless rate much. "Expectations for what the Federal Reserve - what any central bank can do for real growth and labor market outcomes - have become overinflated," he said in July.

Yellen thinks the central bank still has tools in its arsenal, even after buying $2.3 trillion in bonds and holding interest rates close to zero for nearly four years.

"But monetary policy is not a panacea," she said. "There are questions about the efficacy of unconventional policy tools and their use may entail some cost."

Despite her image among some of her critics in Congress as being soft on inflation, Yellen dismisses suggestions that setting higher inflation targets could spur consumer spending and economic growth.

"If you just went out and said you're trying to raise inflation expectations, the average household would just think, 'Oh my God, we have so many problems already, and now you want to make the cost of everything higher?' I don't think that's confidence-inducing," she said.

FIRST FED CHAIRWOMAN?

If Obama needed to find a replacement for Bernanke, he could make the historic decision to appoint Yellen as the first woman to lead the U.S. central bank. But she would likely face tough scrutiny in Congress and beyond.

First, she would likely have to show she isn't willing to risk the Fed's hard-won, inflation-fighting credibility to lower unemployment. Republican Senator Richard Shelby voiced that concern when voting against Yellen to be vice chair in 2010.

"President Yellen has a Keynesian bias toward inflation, in the unrealistic hope that inflation will increase employment," he said.

That's an oversimplification, say former colleagues.

"I don't think Janet is soft on inflation - she recognizes and understands those risks," Broaddus said.

She might have to deflect questions about her role as head of the San Francisco Fed when her region was one of the most troubled spots in the housing bubble. Firms associated with the worst excesses in the housing crisis, like Washington Mutual and Countrywide Financial, were located in the western district.

The Fed was not responsible for overseeing those firms, but Yellen could be asked why her institution did not spot the warning signs.

She could argue almost everyone was caught off guard by the crisis and some major banks under the San Francisco Fed's supervision, such as Wells Fargo, came through with little damage.

However, her saving grace may be her candor about that period.

"We failed completely to understand the complexity of what the impact of the decline - the national decline - in housing prices would be in the financial system," she said at her confirmation hearings.

Still, Yellen has built her reputation on her ability to link scholarship and research to central bank decisions that affect many peoples' lives, taking that connection a step beyond even her mentor, James Tobin.

"She is a terrific macro economist," said Donald Kohn, who preceded Yellen as Fed vice chair.

"She is very smart. She knows the literature, she marshals her arguments very carefully for what she sees as the right side of policy," said Kohn, now a fellow at the Brookings Institution. "It's that respect that she is held in, even by the people who disagree with her, and the reasoning she brings to bear, that are influential."

(Editing by Bill Schomberg, Mary Milliken and Leslie Gevirtz)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
minipaws wrote:
As long as you ignore the demographics of this country, your efforts will continue to fail. Retired and nearly retired people will not spend freely until we are paid a fair interest on our savings. The Fed continues to punish hard work, living within you means and saving your money for retirement. What is their goal?????

Aug 05, 2012 11:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Eric93 wrote:
Anybody who thinks that monetary actions will stimulate the economy at this stage is totally clueless and has no understanding of economics. What is needed in order to stimulate the economy at this point is to INCREASE interest rates. Of course those who misunderstand Keyne’s will fail to grasp this. Right now, due to imbecility at the Fed, interest rates are too low. There is no ‘speread’ for banks to make a profit. There is no interest income for retirees and other who were counting on it to spend. There is also, curiously, the fact that there are no Federal taxes on that income because it is missing. And no banker with a brain is going to lend out money in 30 year mortgages at 3.5% when they know that in a few years interest rates will return to their norm in the 4-5% range, or more, and thus the mortgage lenders will be ‘under water’. The Fed simply doesn’t, as usual, ‘see it coming’. Also the Fed demonstrated clearly in both 2002 and 2009 just how clueless they are by sharply dropping interest rates and expecting ‘something’ to happen in a short time. They seem to not understand that the economy, like a big ship, has ‘inertia’. (ie ‘bodies in motion tend to stay in motion’) Any changes made to interest rates will take from 9 to 15 months typically to effect and change in the economy. However they will free up ‘liquidity’ that will find its way to unuseful, suboptimal purposes like SPECULATION in unhelpful market (like the stock market and housing, etc). How the normal economy and business works is that borrowers who need money can get it from lenders who have money at acceptable interest rates (ie like 4-6%). If rates go too high they will eventually choke of business activity and expansion. Thus if business activity is choked off when rates are 8% then reducing them to 5% will create investment and expansion. However reducing rates from 5% to 3% will not cause as much of an expansion unless there is unusual demand pull (which would normally drive the need for money). Going below 2% you are now in the region where there is no demand and you are ‘pushing’ money out there and hoping. If there is no demand then why push? Below 2% interest everything begins to invert and you are creating a problem. You are attempting to put out a fire by pouring gasoline on it. How dumb can these people be?

Aug 05, 2012 12:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
paintcan wrote:
Before they do anything else – shouldn’t the Fed and Yellen explain clearly why the housing market tanked so suddenly? If they could figure out the cause – they might figure out a cure.

Everyone seem to have a different theory and all of them seem to be incomplete.

Aug 05, 2012 1:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.