Ethics probe could deal losing hand to Nevada Democrat

LAS VEGAS Tue Aug 7, 2012 7:06am EDT

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks during his news conference on the payroll tax cut extension on Capitol Hill in Washington December 23, 2011. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks during his news conference on the payroll tax cut extension on Capitol Hill in Washington December 23, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Yuri Gripas

Related Topics

LAS VEGAS (Reuters) - Harry Reid's future as U.S. Senate majority leader may hinge on whether fellow Nevada Democrat Shelley Berkley can survive an ethics probe involving her kidney doctor husband's businesses.

The House of Representatives Ethics Committee announced in July it was investigating Berkley, a seven-term congresswoman, over whether some of her actions as a legislator were meant to benefit her husband financially.

The news comes at a bad time for Berkley, who is locked in one of the country's closest Senate races against Dean Heller, even before news of the ethics probe. Polls since have shown her trailing the Republican ahead of the November 6 election.

Heller, a former congressman and Nevada secretary of state, has a higher statewide profile than Berkley and the benefit of incumbency. He was appointed to the Senate seat in May 2011 to replace fellow Republican John Ensign, who resigned after a sex scandal.

Berkley is known as a tireless campaigner, but she is not well-known across Nevada and risks having the ethics probe being the main reason voters know her outside of her Las Vegas-area district.

"If that's the first and the last thing people say about Shelley Berkley, she's in trouble," said Eric Herzik, chairman of the political science department at the University of Nevada in Reno. "She certainly has some major damage control to do."

Reid, Nevada's senior senator, is the major force in state Democratic politics. He survived a tough re-election race of his own in 2010 against Republican Sharron Angle and has thrown his organization behind Berkley.

Reid will be replaced as Senate majority leader if the Democrats lose their slim four-seat edge in the Senate, and the Nevada seat could be a key. Respected as a tough campaigner, Reid has been in the spotlight this month for his unflinching talk demanding that Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney release his tax returns.

"If she wins, it will be because of the Democratic machine that Harry Reid created ... because she's not going to do it on her own," Nevada political expert Jon Ralston said.


Outside groups including the conservative Americans for Prosperity and American Crossroads are already investing heavily in the race on Heller's behalf. But Berkley's campaign leads Heller's in out-of-state donations 60 percent to 40 percent, according to the Las Vegas Sun.

Analysts say Berkley will need Reid's organization, a strong performance in Nevada by Democratic President Barack Obama - and possibly mistakes by Heller - if she hopes to win in November.

Nevada is a complicated state for both parties this year. Its large Hispanic population is an advantage for Democrats, but its struggling economy - leading the country in mortgage foreclosures and unemployment - could back Romney's case for change.

"I don't think anybody out there is feeling especially secure," said Jennifer Duffy, senior editor at the Cook Political Report in Washington, which rates the Nevada senate race a toss-up.

An average of polls compiled by shows Obama leading Romney by 5.3 percent in Nevada. Obama won the battleground state by 12 percentage points in 2008, fueled by strong support among Hispanics, who account for about 15 percent of its voters.

In a case stemming from a September 2011 article in The New York Times, Berkley is accused of saving a Las Vegas kidney transplant center, which benefited her husband, a kidney specialist who owns a string of dialysis centers.

But investigators are also interested in how she introduced legislation and wrote letters to regulators on federal healthcare reimbursements that benefited her husband's businesses.

Berkley has denied any wrongdoing and dismissed the case as frivolous, contending that she was working for the residents of her district when she saved the center. She notes that Nevada Republicans - including Heller - also worked on its behalf.

The ethics panel is pursuing the case even though Berkley is leaving the House after the election, whether or not she wins the Senate seat.

It is not expected to rule on her case before election day, but the fact that a probe is taking place at all is something of a stigma.

Berkley's campaign is dealing with the issue head-on. She has released advertisements promoting her work to protect Medicare coverage for kidney dialysis patients and to keep the transplant center open. She also has attacked Heller for supporting Republican budget plans that would change Medicare.

But some analysts said the fact that Berkley is talking about the ethics investigation shows she is worried about it.

"They probably have polling data that her image has suffered because of this issue," Ralston said.

(Editing by Xavier Briand)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (7)
jaham wrote:
The chances of a Republican supermajority are looking better each day.

I truly believe this economy could start booming with some swift and significant policy action.

Aug 07, 2012 9:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Harry079 wrote:
I just want as many posters here to see this. I couldn’t believe Reuters would do something like this. They may claim it was a simple mistake but I don’t think so.

Headline: Democrats, White House wage coordinated attack on Romney taxes

Rueters journalist Richard Cowan writes:

“Four years later, when Barack Obama first campaigned for president, some opposition groups challenged his qualifications to even run, claiming he was not born in the United States, as required by the U.S. Constitution.”

I guess Mr. Cowan and his Editors DO NOT KNOW the Constitution very well.

This is what the Constitution says:

5: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;”

Now if they do not know the difference (which I’m pretty sure either him or one of the two editors listed do) the standards of such basic reporting and editing of facts are so low that the truth doesn’t matter anymore.

Aug 07, 2012 10:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
mutt3003 wrote:
Can anybody name one honest politician. This is what we deserve for voting by the golden rule – what do I have to gain not who is best for the country. Perhaps we need to go beyond voter ID laws and institute a questionaire about those running for office. If you don’t have ID and you cannot answer some random questions about the candidates then you do not get to vote. Time to force people to be informed. May also be time time get rid of political parties. All politicians must vote on bills for their entire constituency not special interests.

Aug 07, 2012 11:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.