As elections loom, Fed's Fisher sees policy minefield

DALLAS Mon Aug 6, 2012 9:41pm EDT

Richard W. Fisher, President and Chief Executive Officer for the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, speaks on International Economics at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, March 3, 2010. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

Richard W. Fisher, President and Chief Executive Officer for the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, speaks on International Economics at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, March 3, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

DALLAS (Reuters) - New steps by the U.S. Federal Reserve to stimulate the economy so close to a presidential election would be a mistake, a top Fed official said on Monday, warning it could create a false impression of bowing to political pressure.

Richard Fisher, president of the Dallas Federal Reserve and a consistent hawk on monetary policy, said the real problem with the economy, and the stubbornly high jobless rate, is Congress's lack of action on fiscal policy.

Fisher, who spoke to Reuters roughly six weeks ahead of a Fed policy meeting that many see coming at a critical juncture, said any perceptions that the U.S. central bank could be motivated by political factors are untrue -- but the Fed must guard against any misimpressions.

Many economists and financial market players expect that the Fed, when it next meets in mid-September, could decide to undertake a third round of quantitative easing. Any such decision coming just weeks ahead of a showdown between President Barack Obama and presumed Republican nominee Mitt Romney, could be construed as being politically motivated, Fisher said.

But nothing could be farther from the truth, Fisher said Monday, noting the stance of Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.

"I don't believe that's the case," he said. "I know that's not the case with Ben, but I'm afraid that as we get closer to election season, that people in the marketplace or elsewhere might draw that conclusion, and it might come back to haunt us."

Among the worst outcomes, he said, would be if the Bernanke Fed were compared to the central bank under Arthur Burns, the chairman who in the 1970s is seen to have allowed inflation to run rampant in part to help President Richard Nixon's bid for the presidency.

"I don't think this should inhibit a decision if it's a right decision," he added, "but I wouldn't want to see this torque up the political tension that surrounds the central bank."

Fisher said he has no doubt the Fed would in theory be able to push down mortgage rates further with more purchases of housing-backed bonds, but that doing so likely won't bring down unemployment. A government jobs report released on Friday showed the jobless rate ticked up to 8.3 percent in July.

"We are at a point where theory collides with the practical," he said. "We have hit a wall, and that wall is called Congress."

The Fed, which met last week ahead of the jobs report, stood pat on policy, leaving interest rates near zero and keeping intact its forecast that rates will stay ultra-low until at least late 2014. It signaled, however, that it was prepared to act unless the economy stages an unlikely comeback soon.

The political conversation surrounding Fed policy was clear in comments made over the weekend by Romney, who voiced his opposition to more Fed easing. "I don't think a massive new QE3 is going to help this economy," he said.

Fisher, who said he had not seen Romney's comments, blamed employers' reluctance to hire on the unpredictability of both tax rates and government spending patterns. He said that none of the big corporate chief executives he talks to believe there is a case for more policy easing, action that typically lowers interest rates, weakens the dollar and boosts the value of stocks and other assets, which can make people feel richer, inducing them to spend.

But with U.S. rates already near zero and Europe's sovereign debt crisis driving a safety bid for low-yielding U.S. Treasuries and other dollar-based assets, easing measures would have limited impact.

The Fed has already taken steps to try to help the economy at two of its five policy meetings this year: in January pushing out its pledge on maintain ultra-low rates until at least late 2014, and in June extending by six months its so-called Operation Twist program aimed at lowering long-term interest rates.

If the Fed launches another round of easing, Fisher said, "Those that do not like us as central bankers I think will be apoplectic."

ROCK AND ROLL

Fisher said he is not currently worried about rising prices, at least in the short term, but he has concerns about the ability to keep inflation near the Fed's 2 percent target rate once the economy picks up.

The Fed has publicly mapping out an exit plan that calls for raising rates and eventually sell securities acquired in its effort to push down long-term rates.

Fisher, however, was skeptical about the plan's effectiveness, especially if the Fed keeps adding to its balance sheet with more bond purchases.

"It's easy to say, but it may be more difficult to do," he said.

Even so, Fisher is optimistic about the potential for a sudden surge in growth, given that many companies have boosted productivity and strengthened their balance sheets since the financial crisis.

"I think the U.S. is ready to rock and roll," Fisher said, adding, "there is a throttling mechanism which is called fiscal policy."

Even if Congress acts to avert the so-called fiscal cliff of tax increases and spending cuts set to take place at the end of the year, those fixes will do nothing to boost hiring. Companies simply cannot take on new employees if they do not know what their taxes will be, Fisher said.

"If our fiscal guys could only get their act together," he said, "we could unleash enormous growth in this country."

(Editing by Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
justinolcb wrote:
the minefield was laid by Obama and his socialist policies – QE1 didnt work, QE2 didnt work, what makes anyone think QE3, 4, 5 or 6 will work? what makes anyone think 4 more years of this guys incompetence will make matters anything but worse? the economy is certainly a political issue and Obama has only made things worse

Aug 07, 2012 3:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Krowster wrote:
These guys are constantly nagging about what we should not do; however, not one has a plan for what needs to be done. The GOP know that they want a nation of servants to cater to their every slave job. The Dems what everyone to live off the creme. None wants the obvious, an honest days share for an honest days work.

We need to start by getting rid of the greed that is being claimed by a system that does little to earn it. They work the people to death, control the lion’s share of shareholders’ vote to make themselves richer so that they can have what they do not need, averice.

Aug 07, 2012 7:52am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Krowster wrote:
Zzzzzzzzzzz.

Aug 07, 2012 7:53am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.