Fed should buy as many bonds as necessary: Rosengren

WASHINGTON Tue Aug 7, 2012 1:30pm EDT

Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren speaks during the Sasin Bangkok Forum July 9, 2012. REUTERS/Sukree Sukplang

Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren speaks during the Sasin Bangkok Forum July 9, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Sukree Sukplang

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A top Federal Reserve official said on Tuesday the Federal Reserve should launch another bond-buying program of whatever size and duration is necessary to get the economy back on its feet, signaling support from some U.S. policymakers for aggressive steps to boost the flagging recovery.

Boston Fed Bank President Eric Rosengren said in interviews with the New York Times and CNBC that the Fed should start buying Treasury and mortgage-backed securities and continue doing so until the economy was back to full strength.

"You continue to do it until it's clear that you're no longer treading water," Rosengren told the New York Times. "You continue to do it until you have documented evidence that you're getting growth in income and the unemployment rate consistent with your economic goals."

Rosengren is not a voter this year on the Fed's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee and is considered to be among the most outspoken "doves" who favor an activist approach to stimulating growth and bringing down the high unemployment rate.

His suggestion that the Fed not place an upper limit to its bond buying represents a new line of thinking in the many unorthodox steps the U.S. central bank has taken since it exhausted its conventional tool -- control over short-term interest rates. The Fed cut the benchmark federal funds rate to near zero in December 2008.

But it also flies in the face of the views of other policymakers who think taking such bold measures so close to the November general election would expose the Fed to criticism of political intervention.

"I'm afraid that as we get closer to election season, that people in the marketplace or elsewhere might draw that conclusion, and it might come back to haunt us," Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher told Reuters in an interview late on Monday.

"I don't think this should inhibit a decision if it's a right decision," he added, "but I wouldn't want to see this torque up the political tension that surrounds the central bank."

Fisher, considered one of the most avid "hawks" who emphasize holding inflation in check at all costs, said he doesn't think that the Fed can lower the 8.3 percent unemployment rate with more bond purchases.

Monetary policy became part of the political discussion this weekend with presumptive Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney saying on Sunday he does not think further Fed bond buying would help the U.S. economy.

U.S. stocks extended gains on Tuesday, while Treasury debt prices eased. The euro rose against the dollar, underpinned by expectations the European Central Bank is prepared to act soon to lower overly high borrowing costs for Spain and Italy.

Since the Fed cut short-term rates to the bone, it has launched two rounds of bond buying, referred to as quantitative easing, worth $2.3 trillion in all. When buying bonds, the Fed has always said how much it planned to buy and over what period.

The Fed at its most recent meeting that ended last week took no new action to stimulate growth despite a flagging recovery but said it stands ready to ease financial conditions if necessary.

Despite improved U.S. hiring last month, most Wall Street economists still expect the Fed to launch another round of monetary stimulus this year, with the majority expecting it to act as soon as September.

Rosengren said the world's largest economy is not growing as fast as policymakers had anticipated, and that he did not expect it to gain strength in the second half of the year.

Other Fed officials have expressed concern that expanding the already bloated balance sheet further could risk triggering inflation when growth accelerates. However, Rosengren said he has not seen inflationary pressures from the two previous massive bond purchase programs of the Fed.

Like Dallas' Fisher, others have questioned whether further bond purchases could do much to help the economy. Rosengren expressed confidence, however, that the approach would reap benefits.

"There are a number of areas where quantitative easing can help," he said. "One, it does push up asset prices. ... A second area is the housing market," he added.

Stock market gains that have followed Fed quantitative easing announcements have increased consumption, he said. Recent improvements in the housing market are in part a reflection of the Fed's aggressive efforts to pull down longer-term interest rates, he added.

(Additional reporting by Neil Stempleman; Editing by Neil Stempleman and James Dalgleish)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
minipaws wrote:
Duh, inflation is not the problem. The problem is you are not paying a fair interest to millions of older Americans, who have worked hard, lived conservatively, and saved their money!

Aug 07, 2012 10:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ashishnfl wrote:
” End the Fed ” may be then you’ll see inflation. Rossengren are you on tax payer payroll? Check on commodities column on your report, Yeah i know feds don’t count inflation in commodities to measure.

Aug 07, 2012 12:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Eric93 wrote:
Sure, he doesn’t see inflation risk now. But in 2020 when prices are double what they are now and other ‘bubbles’ have burst, and the financial system collapse, he will be saying, just like Bernanke and Paulson did – with surprise and horror on their faces – like back in 2009 when it all came tumbling down, that ‘they didn’t see it coming’. Duhhhh. Are they dumbo’s? Or what? They are being paid the big bucks in order to ‘see it coming’ and do something. Or are they playing a more nefarious game?

Aug 07, 2012 1:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.