Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Lawmakers urge Obama admin to OK natural gas exports

WASHINGTON | Tue Aug 7, 2012 4:46pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawmakers ratcheted up pressure on the Obama administration on Tuesday to speed approval for companies to export natural gas, arguing it would help relieve a glut dampening output of the fuel.

The Department of Energy, or DOE, "does not seem to have a set timeline for decisions or a sense of urgency," about approving exports of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, Representatives Gene Green, a Texas Democrat, and James Lankford, an Oklahoma Republican, said in a letter to Energy Secretary Steven Chu.

"Our region and our country need an outlet for natural gas production," Green and Lankford said in a letter signed by 44 House lawmakers from Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Arkansas, 10 of whom were Democrats.

The U.S. natural gas surplus "has produced very low prices for producers and an absence of market opportunities for natural gas, leading many wells to be shut in," the letter said.

It was the second real push from Capitol Hill in support of LNG exports after a group of lawmakers from states rich in shale gas wrote Chu in late June.

The U.S. natural gas revolution, spurred by wide development of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, directional drilling and other technologies, has brought with it a push to build export terminals to send the fuel to markets in Asia and Europe where prices for gas are far higher.

The department is allowed to quickly approve applications to export gas to South Korea, Chile and more than a dozen other countries that have free-trade agreements with the United States. Applications for exports to countries that do not have the agreements with Washington require a more thorough process.

The Energy Department has only approved full export rights for one project, Cheniere Energy Inc's Sabine Pass, terminal.

The department said it would wait on the results from a study of implications of exports on the U.S. economy before acting on eight other applications from Dominion Resources Inc and other companies.

The delay has given presumed Republican candidate for president Mitt Romney's campaign some fodder to criticize the Obama administration for the delay.

Critics say approving gas exports could significantly raise fuel prices and costs for U.S. home owners and gas-dependent businesses. They say the chemicals and other industries that have begun to announce plans to build plants again in the United States, could be hurt if exports boosted prices.

Green and the other lawmakers wrote that each of the ports will require thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in investments. But the investments "cannot be made or fully supported without predictable timelines for decision making by the Department," the letter said.

The DOE would not estimate on Tuesday when it would decide on the exports. The administration "is focused on continuing to expand domestic production of our natural gas resources, which are currently at an all-time high," said spokeswoman Jen Stutsman.

A source at the DOE previously said the two-part study on exports and the U.S. economy would be released in late summer and decisions on the ports would follow a public comment period.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner; editing by Marguerita Choy and Andre Grenon)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
fromthecenter wrote:
There’s your answer to Drill baby Drill. The only answer is to have a more diversified energy solution that doesnt rely so heavily on oil and gas. They will never ever strive to keep the price low, it makes no economic sense to a company that’s only goal is to please share holders.

Aug 07, 2012 12:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
Natural gas cars. We clearly have the natural gas for it. We also have the infrastructure already in place. The pipeline goes right to your house. That’s how you have a gas furnace, gas range, gas drier. Everything is in place, and your big solution is…. export the the natural gas? No wonder America is dying. No one thinks big any more.

Aug 07, 2012 12:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
diluded0000 wrote:
Alk, I read where Travel Centers of America (TA) is installing LNG fuel lanes nationwide. One of the limits on fleets using that fuel is that, like electric, there isn’t infrastructure in place for OTR transport. Same applies to personal transport, you can’t take a road trip in an LNG car. But that appears to be changing in a big way, as we speak. America isn’t dying, it is changing.

Aug 07, 2012 3:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.