Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Norway could have prevented Breivik massacre, says commission

Related Topics

1 of 4. Norway's Police Director Oeystein Maeland (C), Police Chief of the northern Buskerud police district which has jurisdiction over Uoeya island, Sissel Hammer (L) and Chief of Police in Oslo Anstein Gjengedal speaks to the media August 13, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Cornelius Poppe/NTB Scanpix

OSLO | Mon Aug 13, 2012 3:27pm EDT

OSLO (Reuters) - Norwegian police and security services could have prevented all or part of an attack by far-right militant Anders Behring Breivik, who killed 77 people in a bombing and gun massacre last year, a government commission said on Monday.

Intelligence services could have learned about Breivik's plans months before the attack made him the worst mass killer in Norway's peacetime history, the commission's report said.

The government building he bombed should have been better protected and he should have been stopped before he gunned down dozens of victims, mostly teenagers, on an island as police struggled to find a working helicopter and a suitable boat.

"All in all, July 22 revealed serious shortfalls in society's emergency preparedness and ability to avert threats," the commission said.

"The challenges turned out to be ascribable to leadership and communication to a far greater extent than to the lack of response personnel," it said.

Breivik first detonated a fertilizer car bomb outside government headquarters in Oslo, killing eight people, then travelled to the ruling Labour Party's summer camp on Utoeya island where he gunned down 69 victims unimpeded.

Authorities had become aware of his suspicious activities months before when he purchased items that could be used to make bombs but intelligence service failures meant he was not put on a watch list, the commission said in the 482-page report.

The government building should have been much better protected as it had been identified as a security risk years before. But government squabbling over minor details of the security measures needed meant little was done.

Once the bombing took place, a witness's description of Breivik, which was phoned into police, was not passed on to officers in the field for 20 minutes.

Police should have automatically activated drills meant to guard against multiple attacks but weak leadership and disorganization led to delays, the report said.

The military was not immediately informed, police could not find the helicopter, and its boat, intended to transport special forces to the island, could not carry the necessary load.

"The authorities' ability to protect the people on Utoeya island failed. A more rapid police operation was a realistic possibility. The perpetrator could have been stopped earlier on 22 July," the commission said.

Breivik admits the attacks but denies criminal guilt, claiming to be a political activist who attacked the ruling party for its support of Muslim immigration, which he says has adulterated pure Norwegian blood.

His 10-week trial ended in June and a court is expected to deliver its verdict on August 24, with prosecutors asking the five judges to declare Breivik insane.

If deemed insane, he faces indefinite mental care in a facility inside a maximum security prison while if ruled sane, he faces a 21-year prison sentence with the possibility of indefinite extensions.

The commission's finding are a major embarrassment for security forces but the justice minister and security chief at the time have both resigned since the attack while many of the senior police personnel involved have also been replaced.

Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg said on Monday he took ultimate responsibility for the intelligence and police failures, after the publication of the report.

"It took too long to apprehend the perpetrator and the police should have been on Utoeya earlier. This is something I regret," he said.

(Editing by Pravin Char)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
jaguar6cy wrote:
A 21 year sentence for mass murder. it appears liberal and “progressive” standards are being applied. They never want to be seen as judgmental, no matter what the crime. Try to be helpful, the ACLU probably recommended the sentence as a friend of the international court. Are you still a liberal or “progressive”? Why?

Aug 13, 2012 1:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Marginalized wrote:
So where are all the anguished cries for more gun control laws??? Oh yes… Norway HAS strict controls already! Apparently that doesn’t work for someone like Breivik – or to the anti-gun liberals.

Aug 13, 2012 2:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
gregbrew56 wrote:
It’s easy to “be quarterback” on Monday morning…

Aug 13, 2012 7:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.