Sponsored Links

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

Second quarter productivity raised, wage inflation muted

Office workers are seen at a call center in Orlando, Florida, August 30, 2011. REUTERS/Phelan M. Ebanhack

Office workers are seen at a call center in Orlando, Florida, August 30, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Phelan M. Ebanhack

WASHINGTON | Wed Sep 5, 2012 2:34pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nonfarm productivity increased at a much faster clip than initially thought in the second quarter as businesses largely held the line on hiring even as output rose, helping to keep inflation pressures tamped down.

Productivity increased at a 2.2 percent annual rate, the Labor Department said on Wednesday. A month ago it estimated that productivity, which measures hourly output per worker, rose at a 1.6 percent pace. It fell at a 0.5 percent rate in the first three months of 2012.

Economists said the rise was likely to be short-lived, and that businesses might need to step up hiring soon.

"When mediocre output growth is achieved during a virtual hiring freeze, as was the case in the second quarter, the spike in productivity is generally temporary and payback is typical in the following months," said Erik Johnson, a U.S. economist at IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts.

The economy created a measly 219,000 jobs in the April-June period, about a third of the first quarter's tally.

"A widening gap between output and employment growth is a positive for the economy as long as the labor market itself is flourishing," said Johnson. "It is unlikely that firms will be able to continue generating modest output growth without more proportional increases in hiring."

Hiring did pick up in July, with employers adding 163,000 workers to their payrolls. Economists believe the momentum slowed in August.

The upward revision to productivity growth, which beat economists' forecasts for a 1.8 percent rate, reflected an upward adjustment to the estimate for second-quarter economic growth to a still-sluggish 1.7 percent pace from 1.5 percent.

The economy has been hit by fears of the so-called U.S. fiscal cliff -- the $500 billion or so in expiring tax cuts and government spending reductions scheduled to take hold at the start of next year -- and Europe's long-running debt problems.

U.S. financial markets ignored the productivity data and traders took their cue from global developments.

MUTED WAGE PRESSURES

Businesses emerged from the 2007-09 recession lean and are showing little urgency to ramp up hiring, relying on their existing workers to meet production and keeping a tight hand on costs such as wages.

Unit labor costs -- a gauge of the labor-related cost for any given unit of output -- rose at a 1.5 percent rate in the second quarter rather than 1.7 percent, the report showed.

They were up only 0.9 percent from a year-ago, underscoring the lack of wage-related inflation pressures in the economy and helping to keep the door open to further monetary easing by the Federal Reserve to stimulate the economy.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke last week described the labor market's stagnation as a "grave concern," raising expectations among economists that the central bank's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee would decide to pump more money into the economy at its September 12-13 meeting.

"On year-on-year terms, unit labor costs growth remains well contained, suggesting that the FOMC is unlikely to become concerned about upside inflation risks as it considers its policy options," said Yelena Shulyatyeva, an economist at BNP Paribas in New York.

Worker hours rose at a 0.1 percent rate in the second quarter, the smallest increase since the third quarter of 2009, while nonfarm output increased at a 2.4 percent pace.

(Reporting by Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Andrea Ricci and Tim Ahmann)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
altalks21 wrote:
This is a prime example of what is wrong with our economy. The financial businesses are starting to do well (CEO’s are paid top dollar AGAIN! Time to CAP their pay) while other Americans, supporting a family, kids trying to make money for college, older folks trying to pay for insurance, medicine etc, they will never do well! When the economy was good, companies shared profits and productivity gains with their employees. That is no longer the standard. The Income Gap shows why the AT WILL (voluntary), trickle down economics doesn’t work & why we need MANDATORY PROFIT SHARING & a LIVING WAGE LAW, not a minimum wage law. A Living Wage Law will grow, balance and stabilize the economy, even if the legalized gambling, financial sector has another breakdown. Remember these consumers kept the U.S. Economy going, even though they had weak purchasing power. A LIVING WAGE LAW is already in place in several states. One place that has a LIVING WAGE LAW is at the Los Angeles Airport area, for hotel workers & the hotels are still doing business & making money as usual but now these workers can support their families & can contribute to the U.S. economy as consumers. This will help stabilize the economy with their consumer spending, since businesses are still clamoring for consumer spending (retail sales). Consumers are 70% of the economy & are JOB CREATORS. . “If all businesses paid a Universal Living Wage, we could reduce the tax burden on every single American!” raises and bonuses.

Sep 05, 2012 7:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Fantasywriter wrote:
You are such a child. When the economy was good companies never shared the profits, that’s not their mission in life. They paid wages, gave bonuses to employees who deserved it and provided medical insurance. You’re asking companies to pay everyone the same regardless of their productivity and/or contribution to the profit line of the company. Your demand for a MANDATORY PROFIT SHARING & A LIVING WAGE LAW will collapse the private section in short order not stabilize it. The several states, you alluded to, that already have it in place are paying the consequences. Companies, who can, leaving in search of states that provide a better business environment. Jobs are harder and harder to get in these states. Your Los Angeles Airport example is a poor one. These hotel workers are union members, most belonging to SEIU, who are bleeding the Airport and the City of Los Angeles dry. Perhaps you haven’t heard that the City is in dire financial straights. Antonio Villaraigosa, the DNC Co-Chair, apparently believes like you and look where that has taken the city. What you are proposing is a communist state. Perhaps you’ve failed to noticed but history has demonstrated that such states are doomed to failure but not before subjecting its citizenry misery and hopelessness. President Obama’s vision is, ultimately, the same as yours and that is truly frightening.

Sep 08, 2012 9:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.