Big banks weigh risks, rewards of California's new CO2 market

SAN FRANCISCO, Sept 7 Fri Sep 7, 2012 4:28am EDT

Related Topics

SAN FRANCISCO, Sept 7 (Reuters Point Carbon) - Major banks are weighing whether to wade into the California carbon market, which experts believe could grow into a $40 billion a year market by 2020, but one that is also loaded with risk and uncertainty.

Following last week's successful test of the state's auction platform, the reality is starting to settle in: California carbon trading has overcome legal and political challenges to position itself a mere 10 weeks away from its first official CO2 permit sale.

The carbon market's success or failure will sway U.S. environmental policy for years to come, and early-moving Canadian banks like Bank of Nova Scotia (Scotiabank) and the Royal Bank of Canada, as well European banks like Deutsche Bank and Barclays, could play a critical role in that outcome.

Banks facilitate the purchases and sales of carbon credits for their clients, advise company executives on how to keep their costs down, and ultimately help them meet their environmental goals.

But so far, most brand-name investment banks have either kept their distance or already walked away, wary of pumping precious capital into the nascent market, especially in light of their tumultuous experience in the European carbon market.

Just as California hopes to learn from the mistakes made by their counterparts in Europe, where the eight-year-old market has been beset with plunging prices and regulatory uncertainty, banks hope to marshal their European experience to give them an advantage in California.

"We've been trading in Europe for years, so we have a deep understanding of carbon right now," said Anthony D'Agostino, director of emissions markets for the Royal Bank of Canada.

"To replicate this in California is a no-brainer for us," he said.

Although it does not have a long history in emissions markets, Canada-based Scotiabank is the most active bank in the market at this point, with a client roster of oil companies and utilities that represent over half the state's carbon emissions.

Jeff King, managing director of environmental markets, said the experience he has gained in early exchange and over-the-counter California carbon trading will give the bank a leg up once large California companies become more active in the market.

"The market is new, volatile, and trades on news events," he said.

"Some banks are staying away because they keep hearing that cap and trade is dead," he said. "It's taken a long time but it's really just taking root in North America now. This issue isn't going away."


Some big banks have already walked away from the emerging market, soured by their European experience and disappointed that federal carbon market legislation was killed in the U.S. Senate in 2010.

Jason Patrick led Merrill Lynch's U.S. environmental products desk until the Bank of America-owned bank closed it down last March.

But he opted to stay in the young market anyway, helping launch a new company, Real Options International, to assist clients navigating the complexities of the California carbon market, in addition to other environmental and energy markets.

"We believe the California market is here to stay," he said.

He said the lack of participation by big banks creates an opening for independent traders as well as small investment funds willing to take on risk.

"There is less appetite at the banks for emerging markets after the financial crisis," Patrick said. "That creates great opportunities for those that are willing to get involved, particularly those that get involved early."

London-based bank Barclays, an early mover in the California market, did an about-face and closed its desk in January, letting go of trader Kedin Kilgore, who executed the first deal for a California carbon allowance forward contract in November 2010.

But observers believe Barclays and others will come back to the market once trading ramps up in a market expected to grow from $1 billion in 2013 to as much as $40 billion in 2020.

Germany-based Deutsche Bank is also "sniffing around" the California market, talking to potential clients and developing products, a carbon market trader said.

Deutsche has already won a contract from California to act as the market's financial services administrator, collecting bid guarantees on behalf of the state prior to the allowance auction as well as settlement payments.

But that doesn't necessarily mean the bank will look to get heavily involved in trading, carbon market traders said.

Deutsche and Barclays have seen first-hand how frustrating carbon markets can be, having been two of the leading banks in the early days of the European carbon market, where both have since scaled back their presence.

The EU launched its carbon market in 2005, but regulators gave away too many free permits to utilities and industry, and by 2006 prices had collapsed.

Policy changes helped prices to recover for a time, only to fall again back when it became clear that the market was oversupplied with permits.

Even though prices are currently hovering just above all-time lows, emissions in the EU region have come down. While some argue the economic recession is the primary driver of those reductions, many environmentalists claim the program has also played a significant role in the drop.


Despite California's study of the European experience, there are plenty of reasons to be skeptical about the new market's prospects.

California oil companies, manufacturers and food processors that will be covered by the program in 2013 have complained loudly about only being given enough free credits to cover 90 percent of their emissions at the program's outset.

Last month they unsuccessfully lobbied for legislative changes to the program that would have given them more permits.

Lawsuits could also disrupt the market.

A legal challenge by a little-known environmental group opposed to carbon trading was successful in forcing the state to delay the official start of the program until January 2013.

Even the state-versus-federal regulatory status of California carbon allowances has been contentious.

It took two years for the state to fight off a Commodity Futures Trading Commission attempt to regulate them, with the federal government finally deciding that they were "non-financial commodities" that would be primarily state regulated.


While banks decide their next move, trading of California carbon allowance (CCA) forward contracts continues to pick up steam on exchanges and in over-the-counter markets.

Since the IntercontinentalExchange first launched California carbon contracts in August 2011, nearly 12 million California carbon allowances (CCAs) forwards and options have cleared on the exchange, largely in the $15-$18 range.

Just as many CCAs have changed hands in over-the-counter markets over that same time period, traders said.

Currently, about $10 million to $20 million worth of California credits are changing hands weekly.

Much of the exchange-based action has been driven by Houston-based trading desks, which already trade western power and that have simply added California carbon to their portfolios.

The modest trading is expected to ramp up steadily following the November 14 allowance auction as natural buyers like utilities and oil refineries start looking for permits.

At that point, banks can easily enter the California carbon market by hiring just one person, without even opening a new office.

Their real risk is in the potential for trading losses.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
watcher8 wrote:
I’ve never understood the “carbon market”. Supposedly it is trading a commodity that everyone wants to go away. When it goes away what happens to the market and everyone who is still “holding the bag”?

Sep 07, 2012 4:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
texian1 wrote:
Jim – September 8, 2012
Carbon Credits are a scam, and they do nothing to lesson global warming. They are like trading thin air, people used to go to jail for such schemes. They are trying to control CO2. CO2 along with O2 is the life source of this planet, Every living thing either uses CO2 or produces it. The Planet Earth would be totally dead without it. Humans could not exist. Carbon credits are the biggest dumbest scam that ever existed. They need to be declared illegal now, before they cause another collapse in our economy. They will absoluty increase the price of everything a citizen does.
Stop these fools now. It is nothing but a flim flam scam for a few to become very rich for producing and contributing Nothing at all.

Sep 08, 2012 7:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
VeriDempleman wrote:
I don’t think we need a CO2 market.

Also, I don’t think we need to create such a market in California. They can’t seem to manage a budget themselves, but instead create crisis which needs legislation.

Likely what’s best is that California should consider a concept of regulating themselves, instead of blindly trying to pass legislation to benefit their own economy at the expense of the rest of the nation.

When they can balance a budget and have a surplus, then perhaps something should happen. But instead, they seem to have a very real issue, starting with their 8-hour work day. It’s the only labor market in the country that does this; with mandatory overtime assessed on a daily basis. Sometimes, you have to work longer than 8 hours. Likely this single law, if changed, could alleviate multiple issues surrounding infrastructure and traffic, along with CO2 that is pumped out of their own vehicles.

Most of the rest of the country allows 10 or sometimes 12 hour workdays, but because everyone wants to spend the balance of their 8-hour day at the beach, that remains their choice. Perhaps California should consider a stronger manufacturing base, instead of trying to legislate issues, including the recently collapsed SOPA and PIPA legislative efforts too.

If California wants a CO2 tax, they should implement it themselves, and start sending CO2 bills to the only people with money, and excessive spending- the people in Hollywood Hills.

Sep 09, 2012 4:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.