Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Montana judge strikes down state execution method

Related Topics

Fri Sep 7, 2012 7:48pm EDT

(Reuters) - A judge has struck down Montana's lethal injection procedure as a violation of the state constitution because it lacked necessary safeguards against cruel and unusual punishment, effectively suspending executions in the state, officials said on Friday.

State District Court Judge Jeffrey Sherlock ruled that a three-drug program adopted by the Montana Department of Corrections differed from the two-drug protocol spelled out in law, which he said "increases the likelihood of confusion and error in the process."

Sherlock, in a decision handed down on Thursday, also faulted a practice in Montana that allows a prison warden with no medical training or execution experience to determine an inmate was unconscious before a fatal drug was administered.

Furthermore, he found that the prison official setting up the execution process was not required to have experience with the intravenous procedure.

Sherlock said those concerns and the disparity between the protocol in state law and the one practiced by the Department of Corrections created "a substantial risk of serious harm."

But Sherlock did not question the overall constitutionality of the death penalty in Montana, which has only two death row inmates, saying the problems could be easily remedied by the state legislature and the corrections department.

Montana Assistant Attorney General C. Mark Fowler said in a statement that the state was studying the ruling "and determining what options were available to modify the protocol." He added that no executions were scheduled.

Sixteen states and the District of Columbia have no death penalty, and there has been a gradual trend away from capital punishment in the country, with the number of executions falling slightly in recent years.

The decision stemmed from a lawsuit brought in 2008 by the Montana American Civil Liberties Union and attorneys for death row inmate Ronald Allen Smith, a Canadian convicted of shooting and killing two people in Montana in 1982.

Smith's execution was stayed last year pending the outcome of the lawsuit. Smith also has petitioned Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer for clemency.

Ron Waterman, an attorney for Smith, said in a statement that he was pleased the court recognized that insufficiencies in the state's lethal injection protocol "create a situation where execution could inflict pain and suffering."

Convicted killer William J. Gollehon, the only other prisoner on death row in Montana, was later added as a plaintiff in the case.

(Editing By Cynthia Johnston and Bob Burgdorfer)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
KrisCraig wrote:
Murder is murder. The state sanctioning it does not make it any less wrong. Anyone who participates in an execution is an accessory to murder. Any “doctor” who assists with an execution in any way, shape, or form should be stripped of his/her medical license.

The rest of the industrialized world has figured this out. It’s absolutely shameful that our country still practices this despicible, barbaric practice. Our descendants will look back on us with shame.

Sep 07, 2012 8:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.