Former DEA heads urge Holder to speak out against pot ballots

LOS ANGELES Fri Sep 7, 2012 6:07pm EDT

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder during a meeting at the White House in Washington, July 26, 2012. REUTERS/Larry Downing

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder during a meeting at the White House in Washington, July 26, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

Related Topics

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Nine former heads of the Drug Enforcement Administration urged Attorney General Eric Holder on Friday to take a stand against possible legalization of recreational marijuana in three western states, saying silence would convey acceptance.

The nine former officials, illustrating a likely clash between the states and the federal government if marijuana use was allowed for fun, said in a letter dated Friday that legalization would pose a direct conflict with federal law.

"To continue to remain silent conveys to the American public and the global community a tacit acceptance of these dangerous initiatives," said a copy of the letter obtained by Reuters.

Voters in Colorado, Washington state and Oregon are set to decide in the November polls whether to legalize marijuana for recreational purposes and to regulate and tax its sale. They would be the first states to make such a move.

The letter from the former DEA heads is similar to one they sent Holder in 2010 urging him to oppose a recreational pot legalization ballot measure in California. That ultimately failed with 53.5 percent of voters rejecting it.

A spokeswoman for Holder said she was not aware of Friday's letter.

Holder came out strongly against the California measure in a letter to the former administrators before the vote, warning that top U.S. officials would enforce federal laws against pot in California despite any state-level legalization.

Kevin Sabet, a former senior adviser to President Barack Obama's administration on marijuana issues, said he would not be surprised if Holder gave the same response as he had to the California ballot.

"Essentially, a state vote in favor of legalization is a moot point since federal laws would be, in (Holder's) own words (from 2010), 'vigorously enforced,'" Sabet said. "I can't imagine a scenario where the Feds would sit back and do nothing."

Obama administration officials have until now said little about the new ballot measures, although the federal government has cracked down on medical cannabis dispensaries in several states by raiding them and threatening legal action.

MESSAGE TO VOTERS

The nine signatories to Friday's letter included John Bartels, who ran the DEA from 1973 to 1975, and Karen Tandy, who was in charge from 2003 to 2007, as well as all the heads of the federal law enforcement agency in the intervening years.

Tom Constantine, who was in charge of the DEA from 1994 to 1999 and is one of the signatories to Friday's letter, said the former administrators hoped it would send a message to voters and alter the public debate.

Constantine told Reuters the letter was sent "so that the voters would know in all fairness that no matter what they vote on in Colorado or wherever it is, that federal law still prevails."

Obama administration drug czar Gil Kerlikowske, in response to a 2011 petition to legalize and regulate marijuana, said then that federal officials were concerned about the drug as it was "associated with addiction, respiratory disease and cognitive impairment."

Legalization advocates contend that the decades-old drug war in the United States has failed and compare laws against pot to the unsuccessful prohibition of alcohol from 1920 to 1933.

They say society would be better served if marijuana could be taxed and regulated. While no state currently allows recreational use of the drug, 17 states and the District of Columbia permit its use as medicine.

(Reporting By Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and David Brunnstrom)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (18)
totherepublic wrote:
He will be out the door the day we decide to legalize it in WA State what he thiks will not matter. Now what Mitt and Paul are going to do about pot who knows, but there is no way they will allow that crook in their administrtation. And if Rob McKenna(R)wins the Governor seat it is hard to say what he will do about pot but same sex marriage will be out the window so hey…it would be worth it to lose the pot thing. Give and take.

Sep 07, 2012 7:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
gonzo0013 wrote:
Given how much flack Holder has gotten from the botched “Fast and Furious” tragedy, it seems downright insane for him to continue towing the line for this hypocritical and terribly expensive war on science. It is only a matter of time before everyone, including our federal government, acknowledge the medical utility and relative safety of cannabis. Maybe this Attorney General is more concerned about the world he leaves for his children than the profits of greedy pharmaceuticals and private prisons? He could win the election for Obama, by simply acknowledging the reality of this plant’s vast medical utility… Leading to unprecedented job growth and environmental stewardship!

Sep 07, 2012 7:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Unchained wrote:
Pretty easy to follow the money on this. The top ten pHARMaceutical companies make over $100 billion a year. You can pay guys like drug czars and dea agents $100k a year and literally hire a million of them and line all the right pockets and make sure your helathy competion is eliminated.

Sep 07, 2012 7:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus