Israel discussing Iran "red line" with U.S.: Netanyahu

JERUSALEM Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:36am EDT

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem September 9, 2012. REUTERS/Menahem Kahana/Pool

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem September 9, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Menahem Kahana/Pool

Related Topics

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel and the United States are in discussion on setting a "red line" for Iran's nuclear program, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said.

"We're discussing it right now with the United States," Netanyahu said in an interview with Canada's CBC television aired late on Sunday.

In the interview, two days after Canada suspended diplomatic relations with Tehran over its nuclear project, Netanyahu again signaled that a clear boundary - which he has yet to define publicly - could obviate the need for military action.

Netanyahu's recent calls for world powers to set a "clear red line" that would show they were determined to stop Tehran's nuclear drive has suggested a growing impatience with the United States, Israel's main ally.

Washington, which has resisted the idea of laying down red lines for Iran in the past, has been pressing the Israeli leader to give diplomacy and sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic more time to work to rein in Iran's nuclear work peacefully.

Recent heightened Israeli rhetoric has stoked speculation that Israel might attack Iran before the U.S. elections in November, believing that President Barack Obama would give it military help and not risk alienating pro-Israeli voters.


But Netanyahu has faced opposition to any go-it-alone attack from Israeli security chiefs and its popular president, Shimon Peres. Opinion polls show a majority of Israelis do not want their military to strike Iran without U.S. support.

"I don't think that they (Iran) see a clear red line, and I think the sooner we establish one, the greater the chances that there won't be a need for other types of action," Netanyahu said, appearing to refer to military steps.

"If Iran saw that, there's a chance, I won't say it's guaranteed, but there's a chance they might pause before they cross that line."

Israel and the West believe Iran is working toward nuclear weapon development capability. Israel, widely thought to be the Middle East's only atomic power, says a nuclear-armed Iran would be a threat to its existence. The Islamic Republic says its nuclear work is for peaceful energy purposes only.

A senior Israeli government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said talks were being held with "the American administration," as to the red lines. He declined to elaborate.

Israeli newspaper Haaretz said on Monday Netanyahu had told German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle that if Iran enriched uranium above 20 percent, that would provide a red line as it would prove Tehran had chosen to exceed the level of refinement suitable for civilian energy and "break out" with an atom bomb.

Enrichment to 90 percent fissile purity is the typical threshold for weapons-grade nuclear fuel. Haaretz said Netanyahu stressed that from the moment Iran decided to make a nuclear bomb, it would need only six weeks to enrich to 90 percent.

Many independent analysts say, however, that Iran would need additional time - from several months to a year or more - to fashion weapons-grade material into a nuclear warhead and fit onto a missile capable of delivering the payload.

Netanyahu, who met Westerwelle on Sunday in Jerusalem, is scheduled to travel to the New York and address the U.N. General assembly about Iran later this month.

A meeting with Obama, who is deep in his re-election campaign and due to speak to the forum two days before Netanyahu arrives, has not been finalised, the Israeli official said.

(Editing by Jeffrey Heller and Mark Heinrich)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
Grant_X wrote:
Israel is like that spoiled brat in the classroom that the teacher babied so that they don’t go off the deep end and flip over their desk or break a window.

Worry not, I love all people, but the people in this country have picked a government that is bigoted, retaliatory and vengeful. They need to think about how acting like they do with their neighbors is not sustainable. Eventually Israel and their neighbors will learn how to get along. But, how many people have to die and suffer because of their ability to hold lifelong grudges?

I just don’t understand why the US and the rest of the western world allows themselves to be held hostage to this nation.

Sep 10, 2012 5:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
stambo2001 wrote:
Iran, being a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is more than allowed to enrich materials legally. It is Isreal, not being a signatory of the NPT, that is in violation of proliferation agreements, treaties, and laws. Time and again it is conveniently ignored that it was the French and the Americans which illegally proliferated nuclear technology to the Zionists. Time and again it is ignored that it is against the americans own laws to conduct business with nuclear armed nations that are not signatories of the NPT. The only ‘red line’ that can be drawn would have to forbid activities that the Iranians have a legal entitlement to enact. The Zionists have nuclear weapons and will use them to prevent the Iranians from the very same technology. At the very least the Iranians should be able to hide behind the shield of ‘nuclear ambiguity’ as the Zionists do.

Sep 10, 2012 8:29am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Prof.Taheri wrote:
The details of an Israeli attack on Iran are revealed in Jonathan Bloomfield’s book, “Palestine.”

Sep 10, 2012 1:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.