"Frustrated" IAEA wants immediate access to Iran site

VIENNA Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:13am EDT

1 of 2. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano opens his case as he attends a news conference during a board of governors meeting at the United Nations headquarters in Vienna September 10, 2012. The U.N. nuclear watchdog chief pressed Iran on Monday to grant his inspectors immediate access to the Parchin military site, where they believe Tehran may have conducted explosives tests relevant to the development of nuclear weapons.

Credit: Reuters/Herwig Prammer

Related News

Related Topics

VIENNA (Reuters) - The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog pressed Iran on Monday to grant his inspectors immediate access to the Parchin military site, where they believe Tehran may have conducted explosives tests relevant to the development of nuclear weapons.

Yukiya Amano, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, also said it was "frustrating" that the IAEA and Iran had made no real progress in talks that began in January aimed at allaying concern about suspected atom bomb research.

Western powers may seize on his statement to a closed-door session of the IAEA's 35-nation governing board to strengthen their case for further international pressure on Iran, one of the world's largest oil producers.

Saying Tehran must address the substance of the U.N. agency's questions, Amano later told a news conference he was committed to intensifying the dialogue with the Islamic state but that no date had been set yet for a new meeting.

"We need to stop going around in circles discussing process ... Iran has the obligation to fully cooperate with us."

Asked about Iran's demand for access to documents which form the basis for the IAEA's suspicions about possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program, Amano said he was ready to provide them "when appropriate".

He made his comments one day after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel and the United States were in discussions on setting a "red line" for Iran's nuclear program, which Tehran says is peaceful.

Israel, believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East, sees the possibility of Iran developing an atomic bomb as a threat to its existence and has said it may use military means if diplomacy and sanctions fail.

European Union heavyweights Britain, France and Germany called last week for new sanctions and Canada has unexpectedly severed ties with Iran.

IRAN SAYS PARCHIN ALLEGATION "BASELESS"

Iran's envoy to the IAEA, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, said Tehran would "continue" to cooperate with the U.N. agency but that its national security must be taken into consideration.

He told reporters that discussions were under way this week about the possibility of having another meeting with the IAEA.

Iran says its nuclear program is aimed at producing electricity, not making nuclear bombs.

At the week-long IAEA board meeting, the United States and its Western allies want to isolate Iran further by adopting a resolution rebuking it for stonewalling the IAEA's investigation into its nuclear activities.

But it is unclear whether China and Russia - who are also part of a group of six world powers trying to find a diplomatic solution to the long-running nuclear dispute - would agree to such a move, diplomats say. Beijing and Moscow have criticized unilateral Western steps to punish Iran.

Russia last week starkly warned Israel and the United States against attacking Iran and said it saw no evidence that Tehran's nuclear program was aimed at developing weapons.

In contrast, the IAEA has voiced mounting concern that Iran has been conducting research and development relevant to the assembly of a nuclear warhead.

Amano said "activities" that had taken place at the Parchin facility - a reference to suspected clean-up work there - would have an "adverse impact" on the IAEA's investigation, if and when it was allowed to go there. Iran has so far refused access.

Western diplomats cite satellite images as evidence that Iran has for several months carried out apparent "sanitization" work at Parchin to remove any evidence of illicit activity.

Despite this, Amano said his inspectors had "powerful tools" at their disposal to discover any traces or other evidence.

Iran told the agency in a letter last month that the allegation of nuclear-linked work at Parchin, located southeast of the capital Tehran, was "baseless", Amano said.

"However, the activities observed further strengthen our assessment that it is necessary to have access to the location at Parchin without further delay in order to obtain the required clarifications," he said.

(Editing by Kevin Liffey and Patrick Graham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
majkmushrm wrote:
Hello, IAEA, the NNPT does not grant the UN access to member country’s military facilities, only their nuclear facilities. Considering that the US is planning to attack Iran, do you seriously expect them to grant you access to their military facilities knowing as they do that anything that you find at the facility will be in the US’s hands as soon as the UN team gets back to NY? They’re not stupid.

Also, why isn’t now an appropriate time to share the basis for IAEA’s suspicions? Could it be that the basis for the suspicions is American intelligence? Of course, it’s well known that the US doesn’t “cook” its intelligence…..

Sep 10, 2012 11:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
StigTW wrote:
The IAEA has no mandate to inspect military facilities… Which should make anyone wonder why is someone apparently as smart as Amano expressing Iran has an obligation to fully cooperate when clearly the IAEA is overstepping and politicising an overstep. I guess the IAEA is turning into a joke now that it keeps dismissing everyone with integrity from it’s walls.

Sep 11, 2012 5:15am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures