For heart health, omega-3 pills are not the answer

NEW YORK Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:14pm EDT

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - The tides are turning for fish oil, at least when it comes to usefulness of supplements in staving off heart attacks and stroke.

After a lot of initial excitement over omega-3 fatty acids, which are found in oily fish such as salmon and sardines, Greek researchers today released the latest study to find the substances won't help you dodge heart disease - whether you get them from supplements or your diet.

Based on a review and analysis of previous clinical trials including more than 68,000 participants, they found omega-3 supplements had no impact on overall death rates, deaths from heart disease, or stroke or heart attacks.

Dr. Donna Arnett, the president of the American Heart Association, told Reuters Health the new analysis is the largest to date. She said it closes the issue of omega-3's role in heart disease, showing the "supplements are of no benefit" whether or not a person has had previous heart problems.

The AHA does recommend omega-3 supplementation against high levels of triglycerides (a type of fat in the blood) - a condition the fish-oil pills have been approved to treat by U.S. health regulators.

The new study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, pools the results of 18 clinical trials that assigned participants randomly to take either omega-3 supplements or not. It also includes two trials in which people got dietary counseling to increase their consumption of omega-3- rich foods.

The average daily dose of omega-3 taken was 1.51 grams per day and included eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).

A decade ago, the available medical evidence suggested that boosting omega-3 with food or supplements had a strong protective effect. Although the potential mechanism wasn't understood, scientists cited improvements in triglyceride and blood pressure levels and heart rhythm disturbances.

But since then, the picture has grown increasingly clouded. Earlier this year, a group of Korean researchers found that omega-3 supplements had no effect on heart disease or death based on 20,000 participants in previous trials.

Because the trials included in the Greek analysis went as far back as 1989, the researchers also considered whether growing use of statins and other medications could explain why later studies failed to support the early findings.

But according to the team, led by Dr. Mosef Elisaf at the University Hospital of Ioannina, that wasn't the case.

"I think the bottom line is supplements are not always the answer," said Alice Lichtenstein, director of the Cardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory at Tufts University in Boston.

Because people who eat a lot of fish have been found to have less heart disease, she told Reuters Health, researchers figured that perhaps putting the supposed "active ingredients" in a pill could provide similar benefits.

"Once again we found that is not the case," Lichtenstein said. "What we have learned over the years is you can't think about individual nutrients in isolation."

People who eat fish often may be replacing things like steak, hamburgers or quiche, making for a healthier diet overall.

Instead of taking supplements, Lichtenstein recommended helping your heart by eating fish at least twice a week, having a diet rich in whole grains and vegetables, getting lots of physical activity and not smoking.

SOURCE: Journal of the American Medical Association, online September 11, 2012.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
GoldenHU wrote:
Quite simply: Follow the money. Studies such as this are mostly flawed for the simple reason that the sponsors of the study (usually the pharmaceutical industry) have no interest in cheaper supplements that can do the job of more expensive cholesterol medicine without the harmful side effects that they can bring. Cholesterol medicines now come with a warning label on these harmful side effects much like cigarettes do. One must ask, what dosage did they use? Did it have enough vitamin E in the capsule to prevent oxidation in the body? How long was the study? Was the Omega 3 and 6 ratio correct in the subjects body? I have several patients with high cholesterol levels which I immediately put on a high quality, high potency dosage of omega-3 fish oil capsules (that I do not myself sell). Without exception almost all have lowered there LDL cholesterol levels significantly (along with blood pressure). Many to the point where they no longer have to use their medicine anymore. I do warn them however that when they begin with taking this supplement together with their medicine that they have to be careful that their cholesterol levels do not fall too low and to have it checked after a couple of months. One of my patients to which this happened stumped the cardiologist when this happened. When the doctor asked the patient how this could happen the patient told him about the fish oil to which the cardiologist replied, “Stop with the fish oil.” Unbelievable! I am not against medicine. I have to use it myself and it has its place. But statins can be one of the most harmful things that you can do to your body and heart. Statins do lower cholesterol but make the heart weaker in other ways. I always invite my patients to be skeptical over my claims and to take the time to find a reputable website(s) that will give the full story on statins and cholesterol. I invite you to do the same. But always remember:Follow the money…

Sep 13, 2012 7:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.