Japan buys disputed islands, China sends patrol ships

TOKYO Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:40am EDT

1 of 6. A Chinese patrol ship Haijian 46 sails near the disputed islands in the East China Sea, known as Senkaku in Japan or Diaoyu in China, in this handout file photo taken by the Japan Coast Guard in December 2008. Japan brushed off stern warnings by China and bought a group of islands on Tuesday that they both claim, in a growing dispute that threatens to deepen strains between Asia's two biggest economies. Chinese official media said Beijing had sent two patrol ships to waters surrounding the islands to reassert its claim and accused Japan of 'playing with fire' over the long-simmering row. The Japanese Coast Guard could not confirm the report. Japanese media identified the two patrol ships as the Haijian 46 and the Haijian 49, citing Chinese official media sources. Picture taken December 2008.

Credit: Reuters/11th Regional Coast Guard Headquarters-Japan Coast Guard/Handout/Files

Related Topics

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan brushed off stern warnings by China on Tuesday and bought a group of islands that both sides claim in a growing dispute that threatens to deepen strains between Asia's two biggest economies.

China rained warnings on Japan in the wake of the island purchase announcement and official media said Beijing had sent two patrol ships to reassert its claim.

The Chinese military's top newspaper accused Japan of "playing with fire", and the Ministry of Defense warned that more, unspecified steps could follow.

"The Chinese military expresses its staunch opposition and strong protest over this," Defense Ministry spokesman Geng Yansheng said in remarks posted on the ministry's website (www.mod.gov.cn).

"The Chinese government and military are unwavering in their determination and will to defend national territorial sovereignty. We are closely following developments, and reserve the power to adopt corresponding measures."

Tokyo insisted it had only peaceful intentions in making the 2.05 billion yen ($26.18 million) purchase of three uninhabited islands in the East China Sea, until now leased by the government from a Japanese family that has owned them since early 1970s.

Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba repeated Japan's line that the purchase served "peaceful and stable maintenance of the islands".

"We cannot damage the stable development of the Japan-China relationship because of that issue. Both nations need to act calmly and from a broad perspective," he told reporters.

The Japanese Coast Guard will administer the islands, called Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China, which are near rich fishing grounds and potentially huge maritime gas fields.

Geng accused Japan of "using all kinds of excuses to expand its armaments, and repeatedly creating regional tensions".

Beijing has avoided sending military forces into disputed seas at the heart of quarrels with neighbors, including Japan, instead using civilian government vessels to stake its claims.

China's Xinhua news agency reported that two China Marine Surveillance (CMS) vessels reached the waters around the islets on Tuesday morning. The government force is in charge of enforcing law and order in China's waters, but operates separately from the navy.

CHINESE ANGER

The tensions with Japan come while China's ruling Communist Party is preoccupied with a forthcoming once-in-a-decade leadership change, as well as slowing economic growth.

China's focus on domestic politics and the economy will not deter a potentially strong response to Japan, said Sun Cheng, a professor specializing in Japan at the China University of Political Science and Law in Beijing.

"Chinese people won't disregard territorial disputes just because of the economy and the Party Congress," said Sun. "And if China is too soft on this issue, I don't think the Chinese people will abide by that."

The news triggered small-scale protests in front of the tightly guarded Japanese embassy in Beijing. Microbloggers on China's popular Twitter-like service Sina Weibo also reported small anti-Japanese protests in the eastern city of Weihai and the southwestern city of Chongqing.

"We strongly urge Japan to fully grasp the dangerousness of the present situation and step back from the edge of a precipice over the Diaoyu islands issue," the foreign affairs committee of China's national parliament said in a statement read out on a state television news broadcast.

The long-running territorial dispute flared last month after Japan detained a group of Chinese activists who had landed on the islands. And the row appears to be having an economic impact, with a Chinese official saying Japanese car sales in the world's biggest auto market may have been hit.

Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda, in an address to senior military officers, made no direct reference to the islands dispute, but pointed to China's growing military clout as one of challenges Japan had to contend with.

The Japanese foreign ministry said it was sending its Asia department chief to Beijing on Tuesday for talks to "avoid misunderstanding and lack of explanation on the issue".

The government bought three of five islets that it has been leasing from the Kurihara family, which bought the islands in 1972 from another Japanese family that had controlled them since the 1890s. The government has owned one of the remaining islets and continues to lease one from the Kurihara family.

Noda floated the plan to buy the islets in July to head off what appeared to be a much more provocative bid by Tokyo governor Shintaro Ishihara, a harsh critic of China, to purchase them and make the islands available for development.

(Additional reporting by Kaori Kaneko and Tetsushi Kajimoto in Tokyo; and Michael Martina, Terril Jones and Chris Buckley in Beijing; Writing by Tomasz Janowski; Editing by Jonathan Thatcher and Nick Macfie)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
Bantelis wrote:
I do agree that the past wartime conduct of war of the Japanese has nothing to do with their legitimate rights over the Islands. By principle of Attrition these lands had been theirs for many decades already. and the act of the US of returning to the Japanese possession is an implicit recognition of the Japanese legitimacy.

This contending behaviour of Chinese is clearly a matter of “imperialist ego”.

Sep 11, 2012 7:47am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Spacetime wrote:
No matter. Chinese will take it back, put it under effective management, then after many decades, it’s a Chinese territory even according to your “principle of Attrition”.

If Us wants to fight China for Japs, that’s a matter of “imperialist ego”. Us is not the world’s only superpower anymore.

Sep 11, 2012 8:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Pterosaur wrote:
Yes, facing Imperialists like the US and Japan, only actions count. China has finally realized it. Not too late.

Sep 11, 2012 10:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures