Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

White House, Republicans trade blame over looming spending cuts

Related Topics

An aerial view of the Pentagon building in Washington, June 15, 2005. REUTERS/Jason Reed

An aerial view of the Pentagon building in Washington, June 15, 2005.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

WASHINGTON | Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:27pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House presented a detailed breakdown Friday of $109 billion in across-the-board spending cuts scheduled for January, setting off a fresh blame game between the Obama administration and Republicans over responsibility for what both say is a preventable budgetary calamity.

The itemization of the so-called "sequestration" plan showed potential pain all around: $11 billion out of the Medicare healthcare program for the elderly, a $15.3 billion cut in defense procurement accounts and hefty cuts to a Department of Agriculture program that supports farm prices.

There was also a cut of $129 million from embassy security, which would be particularly ill-timed in light of deadly attacks on U.S. diplomatic posts in the Middle East, Africa and Afghanistan by Islamic militants in recent days.

The list, in 394 pages, included millions slashed from familiar programs such the National Institutes for Health, the national parks, the Smithsonian and all the regulatory agencies. It could generate new public concerns as the presidential and congressional races enter the home stretch.

For example, the American Cancer Society issued a statement saying the automatic cuts would result in 50,000 fewer low-income and underinsured women being screened for cancer next year.

State and local government officials will read the fine print carefully. For example, payments to issuers of Build America Bonds, a financing tool created as part of the 2009 economic stimulus, will be cut by $255 million, according to the document. The taxable municipal bonds are designed to help finance capital projects.

The reductions, aimed at lowering U.S. budget deficits, would result in a 9.4 percent cut in defense programs and an 8.2 percent reduction in an array of domestic government activities, the White House budget office said.

The sequestration is the result of the failure of Congress and the administration to agree to a long-term deficit reduction package.

DEFENSE INDUSTRY FIGHTING BACK

The broad percentages were no surprise. But until attached to specific programs, the results were difficult for all but skilled lobbyists and corporations to digest. The defense industry mobilized months ago to fight the sequestration, issuing its own studies about the impact.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
foiegras wrote:
You mean after threatening to shutdown the government (again), default on the national debt, getting the US credit rating downgraded (not because of the deficit, but because thirty barking junior Republicans highjacked the House)…after all our interesting stunts…that we have to actually make the budget cuts that we blackmailed everybody into…

Wait a minute! Wha’ happened? We can’t afford to make these cuts!

My fellow Americans…we’re wading in deep pudding with this righteous “conservative” crew.

Sep 14, 2012 11:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Walt_P wrote:
Finally…real cuts. I’ve been waiting years for this.

Folks, we have to take our fiscal medicine, or we are going to waste away with governmental diabetes and heart disease.

Sep 15, 2012 6:11am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Abulafiah wrote:
I don’t get it. I thought Republicans liked spending cuts. Don’t they keep howling about Obama spending too much? Yet now that he is cutting spending, they howl about that too.

I really get the feeling Republicans don’t know what the hell they want. Spend money- Republicans say it is wrong. Don’t spend money- Republicans say that is wrong too. When they are in power – they increase the debt more than Obama (Republicans 89%; Obama 43%), but that is okay!

Sep 15, 2012 10:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.