Chicago teachers extend strike until at least Wednesday

CHICAGO Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:44pm EDT

1 of 2. Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis (R) leaves a press conference on the fifth day of their strike in Chicago, September 14, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/John Gress

Related Topics

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Chicago Teachers Union delegates decided on Sunday to extend their weeklong strike until at least Wednesday to give them time to consult with rank-and-file members before voting to suspend the walkout.

In a surprise decision, union President Karen Lewis said that some 800 delegates meeting on Sunday to review a new contract agreement negotiated with Mayor Rahm Emanuel decided that they needed more time to consider whether to go back to work.

"A clear majority (of the delegates) wanted to stay out. That's why we are staying out," Lewis told a news conference after a three-hour meeting.

Before the meeting, Lewis had said she would ask the delegates to suspend the strike by 29,000 teachers, school nurses and other support staff.

The decision was a setback for the union leadership that had appeared to have strong support for its confrontation with Mayor Rahm Emanuel.

Both sides claimed some victories in the new agreement.

Emanuel compromised on the design of the first update of the evaluation system for Chicago teachers in 40 years, according to details of the agreement released by both sides. He agreed to phase in the new plan over several years and reduced the weighting of standardized test results in reviewing teachers.

Teachers won some job-security protections and prevented the introduction of merit pay in their contract.

The Chicago strike has shone a bright light on a fierce national debate over how to reform failing inner-city schools. The union believes that more money and resources should be given to neighborhood public schools to help them improve.

Emanuel and a legion of financiers and philanthropists believe that failing schools should be closed and reopened with new staff and principals to give the students the best chance of improving academically.

In Chicago, more than 80 neighborhood schools have been closed in the last decade as the enrollment has declined by about 20 percent.

At the same time, 96 so-called charter schools have been opened. Charters are controversial because they are publicly funded but non-union and not subject to some public school rules and regulations. Their record of improving student academic performance is mixed, studies show.

Lewis and the union argue that charters are undermining public education.

"We work very hard," said Rhonda McLeod, a special-education teacher at a neighborhood school on Chicago's South Side and one of the delegates who voted on Sunday. "To say a teacher comes in and phones it in is the biggest lie I ever heard."

The agreement calls for a 3 percent raise this year and 2 percent in each of the next two years. If the agreement is extended for an optional fourth year, teachers get a 3 percent increase. The increases will result in an average 17.6 increase over four years, the district said.

The deal could worsen the Chicago Public Schools financial crisis. Emanuel said the contract will cost $295 million over four years, or $74 million per year.

Debt rating agencies had previously warned that the new agreement with teachers could bust the school district budget and lead to a downgrade of its credit rating.

The district has drained all its financial reserves to cover an expected budget deficit over the next year and has levied the maximum property tax allowed by law.

Lewis said that teachers also fear that when the strike ends, Emanuel will soon announce the closing of scores of schools to save money to pay for the new contract with teachers and to make room for opening more charter schools.

Teachers won a concession from Emanuel that half of all teachers hired by the district must be union members laid off from school closings.

(Additional reporting by Peter Bohan; Writing by Greg McCune; editing by Eric Beech and Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (15)
taxcorps2 wrote:
This country would do well to wake up to the fact that class-room teachers’job is to teach, and that they are being extremely hampered in doing their job in many school. Class-room teachers cannot physically, financially, morally and emotionally overcome all of the social obstacles to learning that affect the students, individually and collectively, they are trying to teach. Teachers do not run our society. They can greatly help our society, given even remotely reasonable resources with which to work, given students who have food, clothing, shelter and moral support in addition to that of the teacher. Schools where students do better have more resources – more money to use to help students. This is a fact, get over it, quit denying it. Spend a month or two or three IN the CLASSROOM with a teacher in one of the schools any of you claim to be expert in how to fix.

Sep 15, 2012 11:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jamesd1999 wrote:
I disagree with taxcorps assumption that the better schools are ones where more money is spent. Actually the better schools are the ones where the school system, the teachers, and the parents all work together for the benefit of the children. I live in downstate IL and all of our local schools spend a lot less than Chicago schools per pupil and our students outperform Chicago students in every area. This just isn’t in my town, but in many of the surrounding towns as well and it is because first and foremost we have a lot of active parents who truly care and secondly we don’t keep teachers or school administrators around who do not demonstrate the same level of caring as the parents.

I am not saying we do not have room for improvement, but for the most part we work together for the sake of the kids.

Sep 15, 2012 11:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jamesd1999 wrote:
One thing to keep in mind about this tentative agreement is that all it means is that they have something that enough of the negotiating teams feel the members can live with and is worth enough to present to the union members. The potential problem though comes in with how this agreement is actually presented to the membership. If a few of the union leaders do not actually like the proposed contract they can easily sabotage the vote by making it sound negative and actually get away with it because the membership will not be given enough time to actually read and understand the contract and therefore will have to rely on the “cliff notes” presented to them by the union leaders.

I have watched several union contract votes in person as a neutral observer and they all go through the same routine.

Sep 15, 2012 11:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus