Sponsored Links

TEXT-Fitch cuts Peugeot's senior unsecured rating to 'BB-'

Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:38am EDT

Sept 19 - Fitch Ratings has downgraded Peugeot SA's (PSA)
Long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) and senior unsecured rating to 'BB-' from
'BB'. The Outlook on the Long-term IDR is Negative.

The downgrade reflects Fitch's reassessment of the European auto sector overall
following a further review of PSA's, Renault SA's ('BB+'/Stable) and Fiat Spa's
('BB'/Negative) current and expected performance and a deeper comparison with
close international peers.

In particular, it is underpinned by Fitch's expectations that PSA will continue
to post negative free cash flow (FCF) through 2014 and the ongoing challenges it
faces to improve its business and financial profile. In particular, Fitch is
concerned about the group's positioning in the less profitable small- and
medium-sized car segments, where the agency does not expect the ongoing fierce
competition and substantial price pressure to abate in the near term, as well as
the weak or negative profitability in several international markets, which could
take time to overcome, as competition is also mounting in these markets.

Fitch projects further cash absorption at least in 2012 and 2013, and the
potential for further cash burn in 2014 remains high. This follows already
significant negative FCF in 2011 (EUR1.9bn) and insufficient positive FCF in
2009-2010 to cover the EUR3.9bn of negative FCF in 2008. The agency believes
that underlying cash from operations (CFO) will gradually improve, in line with
the group's expectations that it will return to breakeven by end-2014 at FCF
level. However CFO will remain weak for the rating category in 2012-2013 and may
not be enough to cover ongoing capex at the group level,

Fitch views positively PSA's significant efforts to bolster its revenue base,
streamline its cost structure and preserve or generate cash. These measures will
have a positive effect on the group's profitability and balance sheet. However,
the agency is concerned that improvement will be gradual and that it will take
time for cost-saving actions to fully accrue on earnings and feed through to the
cash flow statement, notably in the current adverse environment.

The Negative Outlook reflects high execution risks as PSA remains seriously
exposed to a further deterioration in the environment. A further decline in
revenue would compound the short-term costs associated with restructuring
measures and weigh heavily on profitability before the positive impact from
restructuring could benefit cash generation. The environment remains extremely
difficult for volume manufacturers in Europe, from continuously anaemic demand
driven by poor macro-economic conditions, fierce competition and aggressive
discounting. Fitch considers that a further contraction of new vehicle sales in
PSA's main European markets in 2013 is highly probable following Fitch's base
case of a 7% decline in 2012.

The Outlook could be revised to Stable if Fitch considers that macro-economic
risks recede sufficiently to enable the group to successfully implement its
measures to boost revenue and streamline costs, including the sustainability of
the group's new models success and improved profitability at its international
operations. It could also be driven by a decline in leverage at a quicker pace
than currently forecast by Fitch.

Fitch expects that declining underlying profitability and rising debt from
projected negative FCF will push FFO gross adjusted leverage and CFO on adjusted
gross debt to the bottom end of the 'BB' rating category for at least another
two years. Fitch calculates that FFO gross adjusted leverage will rise
continuously to more than 3.6x at end-2013 from 3.2x at end-2010, despite asset
sales and that CFO on adjusted gross debt will remain under 25% in the same
period.

Nonetheless, the agency has no specific concern that the company could face
immediate liquidity issues. The group enjoyed a healthy liquidity cushion of
EUR7.6bn in cash and equivalents at end-June 2012. It also reported EUR1.4bn in
financial assets, which Fitch excludes from its calculation of net debt, but
that could provide additional flexibility in case of heavy financial stress. In
addition, committed credit lines of EUR2.4bn at PSA, EUR660m at Faurecia and
EUR8.0bn at Banque PSA Finance were undrawn at end-June 2012.

In addition, the group has taken several measures to preserve its liquidity and
others to raise cash. In particular, the group is in the middle of a EUR1.5bn
asset disposal programme, including its rental car business Citer, which it has
already disposed of for EUR0.5bn and EUR0.3bn of real estate divestitures. PSA
also expects to finalise the sale of a large stake in its logistics division
Gefco, although the total amount and timing remains uncertain. The industrial
business's liquidity will also benefit from the payment of an exceptional
EUR360m dividend from BPF, although the impact will be neutral at group level.
Finally, the 7% stake purchase in PSA by GM in Q112 was accompanied by a EUR1bn
capital increase.

WHAT COULD TRIGGER A RATING ACTION?
Positive: Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to
positive rating action include
- The group's automotive operating margins becoming positive
- FCF turning positive, leading in particular to FFO adjusted gross leverage
below 2.5x

Negative: Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to
negative rating action include
- The environment continuing to deteriorate, leading to further revenue decline
at group level and continuous negative operating margins (actual or expected)
- If Fitch believes the group will not be able execute its plans of returning to
positive FCF by end-2014
- Deteriorating liquidity


Additional information is available at www.fitchratings.com. The ratings above
were unsolicited and have been provided by Fitch as a service to investors.

Applicable criteria, 'Corporate Rating Methodology' dated 8 August 2012 is
available at www.fitchratings.com

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Corporate Rating Methodology
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.